• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Info PSA- Public impeachments start today- UPDATE 2/5/2020- Trump wins.

Page 30 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Bitek said:
WTF crazy shit is Nunes ranting about today? Lol

"Read this article! Conspiracy! Bias!"

**Uh, chairman, what do we say about Trump's crimes?***

"HUNTER BIDEN! FAKE NEWS!"
Click to expand...
Don't forget 'the media is just an extension of the Democratic party'. Someone should hint to him that truth is too.
 
I almost feel sorry for Nunes, he’s a one trick pony performing horribly for an audience of one with no real defense wrt Trump’s actions except to tell people to watch Fox News.
 
Vindman is a good witness for the defense by making unnecessary attributions to the facts. He should be making statements about what he saw and heard.
 
Nunes is trying to out the whistleblower right now...seems pretty clear that Lt. Col. Vindman spoke to someone in the IC who *might* be the whistleblower (but he wouldn’t necessarily know that 100%) and both Schiff and counsel are advising Vindman not to name names of officials he spoke with within the IC.
 
Homerboy said:
For those of us unable to watch, can you briefly recap?
Click to expand...

Kind of a lot to recap, he's basically just testifying to his firsthand knowledge of the same shit we already know about but as this is primarily a political proceeding and not a legal one the manner in which he's doing it is devastating. I really enjoyed when he corrected Nunes to address him by his title, haha.
 
They have firsthand witnesses in front of them, as they demanded, and the Republicans are wasting the witnesses' time with ridiculous questions 🙄
 
fskimospy said:
Kind of a lot to recap, he's basically just testifying to his firsthand knowledge of the same shit we already know about but as this is primarily a political proceeding and not a legal one the manner in which he's doing it is devastating. I really enjoyed when he corrected Nunes to address him by his title, haha.
Click to expand...
I liked when he said he speaks Russian, Ukrainian, and a little bit of English.
 
Xcobra said:
They have firsthand witnesses in front of them, as they demanded, and the Republicans are wasting the witnesses' time with ridiculous questions 🙄
Click to expand...

It is kind of amazing that they complained about the previous witnesses because they didn't have firsthand knowledge of this phone call and then when they get someone who has exactly what they claimed to want they instead try to find out information about the whistleblower... a guy who didn't have firsthand knowledge of the phone call.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top