Originally posted by: TuxDave
Hah wow there's actually a law enforcing proper behavior during the Star Spangled Banner? I learned what you were supposed to do during it but I never actually knew you were bound by law to do it. Seems kind of wrong.
The Flag Code carries no enforcement clause and is essentially saying "this is what you should do, but the government can't make you". It has all the enforcement power of a non-binding "sense of the Congress" statement. It is the studied opinion of the Supreme Court that actions related to the flag should be protected especially strongly as a "freedom of speech" issue, even/especially where those actions may be seen as disrespectful or distasteful by others.
Despite the efforts of some in other branches of government, you may legally do virtually anything with the flag that does not break some other law, including burning it.
Originally posted by: EMPshockwave82
You have the rights but you do not deserve to have them. How exactly is that contradictory?
EDIT:
Defined:
Have - To possess, own, hold
Deserve - worthy of being treated in a particular way
The founders believed that all people intrinsically deserved certain rights.
The reality of the law at that time did not meet that standard, and arguably it still does not, but then they did also believe in working to build "a more perfect union".
Originally posted by: LS21
They tell you to take off your hat. What the fuckdoes a hat have to do with being patriotic? What possible relationship exists between the uncovered head and A FEELING THAT OUGHT TO LIVE IN YOUR HEART?
Removing your hat is a sign of respect toward the flag and what it represents, not dissimilar to removing your hat when you enter a building. I don't know the specifics of how this became embedded in our culture, but it's there. It is a symbolic act, in the same vein as stopping your car to allow a funeral group to pass. Certainly the corpse does not care if you stop or not.
Suppose you have a red, white, and blue hat? Suppose you have a hat made out of a flag? Why would you take it off to honor the flag? Wouldn't you leave it on and point it toward the flag?
As also noted in the Flag Code, the flag should not be made into a garment of any kind. If you have a red, white, and blue hat, then you just have a red, white, and blue hat.
Originally posted by: daniel1113
First of all, it's a meaningless song. The vast majority of the people that sing it do so because it's the thing to do, not because it has any real meaning to it. You consider that an honor?
The Star Spangled Banner celebrates a signficant American military victory in the War of 1812, without which the United States might no longer exist. It is about enduring in a struggle against a vastly more powerful opponent, in defense of one's ideals. This is a distinctly idealized perspective on the War of 1812, but such is the nature of national anthems.
Most people that sing it, or hear it, treat it as just another song. That is certainly true. But if a fraction are reminded of what is good in America, then there is value in that.
Second, people that choose not to take part in singing or any other pointless rituals are not spitting on the graves of others, as you put it. They are being individuals in a sea of excessive nationalism.
They are exercising their freedoms, as they have every right to do. I very much dislike the trope that all sorts of acts are disrespectful toward veterans, both because it is often used inappropriately and because it suggests that everyone that has ever worked to protect American freedoms was carrying a gun.
But the rituals are not pointless. They are a reminder of the dream of what America is supposed to be. There is no king to declare America shall exist, no shared race or religion or thousand-year history to bind its people together. It survives only because its people believe it should. There is perhaps some symbolism in the fact that such rituals are voluntary.
personal liberty (which is, by the way, the only real principle upon which our country is founded)
Oh, surely you jest.
The founders were big on personal liberty, no doubt there. But they also saw the importance of the rule of law, equality before the law, and the principle that the court system and the government in general should be accessible to all. These were not universally held ideas at the time, even in Western Europe, and they still aren't. There were a lot of other important Big Ideas (separation of powers, checks and balances, equality of opportunity), but those are the most critical.