Prove the Following:

[JPS35]

F(B5) = {[(New BSG)^2 + (SW 4+5+6) + cos(SG1)}] / √[(SW 1+2+3 )] + (ST:TOS+TNG)} - lim┬(n→&#8734〖ST:V〗{tan[(ST: DS9) - (SGU/SGA)]} / {BSG:TOS + log_2〖(ST:E&#12311}

iff

B5 ≥ New BSG ≥ SW 4+5+6 ≥ SG1 ≥ SW 1+2+3 ≥ ST:TOS+TNG

And

SW 1+2+3 > ST: DS9 > SG:U > BSG:TOS > ST:E > SG:A

And

lim┬(n→&#8734〖ST:V〗≠ 0

 

[TheVrolok]

Voyager was awesome. I said it.

 

[manimal]

potatoe

 

[Greenman]

No thanks. Or 7, I could go either way.

 

[etrigan420]

I don't know shit about maths, but the new Battlestar Galactica sucked ass.

 

[Ichinisan]

I don't need to prove it. It is -- because I said so.

 

[phucheneh]

Voyager was awesome. I said it.

You're worse than Hitler.

 

[Blanky]

Voyager was awesome. I said it.

Unwatchable

 

[Ruptga]

Voyager was awesome. I said it.

Unwatchable

Both of these are true, depending on the episode. It had its moments, but ultimately was uninspired. And the writers seriously needed to just drop the time travel shit. They wouldn't though, and they'd go on to ruin Enterprise because of it.

 

[GagHalfrunt]

Voyager was awesome. I said it.

But you didn't mean it. I hope.

 

[phucheneh]

Was there time travel in Voyager? I don't remember. I must have been distracted by all the sucking.

 

[Paratus]

I don't know shit about maths, but the new Battlestar Galactica sucked ass.

 

[Printer Bandit]

Let me throw that into my TI-86.

 

[Nograts]

The answer to all of life's problems can be solved with one of three solutions:

1) 7
2) Bill Murray
3) Alcohol

I choose Bill Murray for this situation.

 

[JPS35]

Let me throw that into my TI-86.

Please show your work.

 

[ninaholic37]

F(B5)

Why is B5 in brackets? And how do you even x(y)?

 

[Captante]

F(B5) = {[(New BSG)^2 + (SW 4+5+6) + cos(SG1)}] / √[(SW 1+2+3 )] + (ST:TOS+TNG)} - lim┬(n→&#8734〖ST:V〗{tan[(ST: DS9) - (SGU/SGA)]} / {BSG:TOS + log_2〖(ST:E&#12311}

iff

B5 ≥ New BSG ≥ SW 4+5+6 ≥ SG1 ≥ SW 1+2+3 ≥ ST:TOS+TNG

And

SW 1+2+3 > ST: DS9 > SG:U > BSG:TOS > ST:E > SG:A

And

lim┬(n→&#8734〖ST:V〗≠ 0

That might as well be hieroglyphics as far as I'm concerned.

 

[ImpulsE69]

There's a flaw in your equation. There is no way SG:U or ST:E is > SG:A

 

[Bubbleawsome]

this is a fun thread

 

[Printer Bandit]

this is a fun thread

 

[Carson Dyle]

You looking for a new tat?

 

[Slew Foot]

Sw 4,5,6>*.*

 

[master_shake_]

F(B5) = {[(New BSG)^2 + (SW 4+5+6) + cos(SG1)}] / √[(SW 1+2+3 )] + (ST:TOS+TNG)} - lim┬(n→&#8734〖ST:V〗{tan[(ST: DS9) - (SGU/SGA)]} / {BSG:TOS + log_2〖(ST:E&#12311}

iff

B5 ≥ New BSG ≥ SW 4+5+6 ≥ SG1 ≥ SW 1+2+3 ≥ ST:TOS+TNG

And

SW 1+2+3 > ST: DS9 > SG:U > BSG:TOS > ST:E > SG:A

And

lim┬(n→&#8734〖ST:V〗≠ 0

i get it!

i think....

42.

you're welcome.

 

[SKORPI0]

F(B5) = {[(New BSG)^2 + (SW 4+5+6) + cos(SG1)}] / √[(SW 1+2+3 )] + (ST:TOS+TNG)} - lim┬(n→&#8734〖ST:V〗{tan[(ST: DS9) - (SGU/SGA)]} / {BSG:TOS + log_2〖(ST:E&#12311}

iff

B5 ≥ New BSG ≥ SW 4+5+6 ≥ SG1 ≥ SW 1+2+3 ≥ ST:TOS+TNG

And

SW 1+2+3 > ST: DS9 > SG:U > BSG:TOS > ST:E > SG:A

And

lim┬(n→&#8734〖ST:V〗≠ 0

--------------------------------------------------

Substituting the IMDb ratings for each show.

B5 = 8.2

BSG:TOS= 8.8
NBSG = 8.8

SW 4+5+6 = 8.7+8.8+8.4 = 25.9
SW 1+2+3 = 6.6+6.8+7.7 = 21.1

ST:TOS = 8.4
ST:TNG = 8.7
ST:V = 7.7
STS9 = 7.9
ST:E = 7.5

SG1 = 8.5
SGU = 7.7
SGA = 8.1
------------------
F(8.2) = {[(8.8)^2 + (25.9) + cos(8.5)}] / √[(21.1 )] + (17.1)} - lim┬(n→&#8734〖7.7〗{tan[(7.9) - (7.7/8.1)]} / {8.8 + log_2〖(7.7&#12311}

iff

8.2 ≥ 8.8 ≥ 25.9 ≥ 8.5 ≥ 21.1 ≥ 17.1

And

21.1 > 7.9 >7.7 > 8.8 > 7.5 > 8.1

And

lim┬(n→&#8734〖7.7〗≠ 0
===================
Still confused....

 

[maniacalpha1-1]

B5 ≥ ds9 ≥ bsg ≥ sg1 ≥ sg:a ≥ sw 4,5,6 ≥tng > sw 1,2,3, >st:e >sgu > st tos > bsg tos