• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Pros/Cons of an SUV? Sedan?

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: acemcmac
I've never had a "low range gearbox" and never had any problem getting anywhere in the snow in my ABSless Traction Control-less mustang... even when it was hills of unpacked powder a foot deep with my summer tires and I can prove it
B.S.
I don't live in a really snowy climate, I live in NC, and when it snows here, I'll bet you the title of any car/truck/SUV I own to a quart of piss that you can't follow me on some of the roads I travel around here in any freaking Mustang. Doesn't matter how good you can drive if the car simply won't go, and on the snow/ice mixture we typically get, your butt will be in the ditch if you try.
Now if you live somewhere where you get REAL snow, and where they can clear it in a timely manner, you may get around just fine. But our snow here is a different thing altogether.
Edit: And even if you manage to get around in a car like a 'Stang, you won't do it as safely and as easily as I do in my 4x4.
Just because it can be done doesn't mean that it should be done, or can't be done better.
I have no problem with Mustangs, but I can't fit in them, and they can't carry my family.
Nor can they tow anything.
I need an SUV. So I have three.
 
Originally posted by: Pacfanweb
Originally posted by: IHateMyJob2004
Coming from Buffalo, all you see i nteh ditches is SUVs. So:
2. Better for snow?
BULL SH!T!! To stay out of the snow, you nmeed oto know how to drive. And if that's truely your concern, front wheel drive is 10 times better than 4 WD!

For that matter, AWD is almost as bad as 4 WD.

TWO BIG ADVERTSING GIMICS THAT ARE TOTAL BS!
FWD is NEVER better than 4WD in the snow. Ever. Anyone who says it is simply isn't credible.

AWD, I'm not a big fan of, but true 4WD can't be beat in the snow....there's no way that having 2 extra tires pulling you isn't better.

I grew up in upstate NY and never once owned a 4wd vehicle. My first car was a SAAB 99 and I only managed to get that car stuck once and it was in mud...I buried it up to the axles until the body was resting on the ground. I never once got it stuck on snowy roads.

Funny that half the vehicles I remember seeing in the ditch during a snow storm were big heavy 4WD vehicles or big front heavy RWD American cars.

Nothing beats near 50/50 weight distribution, good snow tires and FWD in the snow. Unless you are driving off road where you need ground clearance this is all you need.
 
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
An SUV is never safer than a sedan...does your friend ever read auto magazines or does he just base his opinion on some stupid "my SUV is trail rated" or the inane "professional grade crap" commercials?
Dumb statement. There might be certain times a sedan is safer, and others that the SUV is safer.
Depends on which SUV or sedan you're talking about. Don't make blanket statements when you don't know what you're talking about.

 
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Nothing beats near 50/50 weight distribution, good snow tires and FWD in the snow. Unless you are driving off road where you need ground clearance this is all you need.
Except the same 50/50 distribution and 4wd. Sure, there are conditions when you can get around just fine with FWD, but there is a point that the 4x4 is superior, and even if you are getting about okay with FWD, a 4x4 is still more sure-footed and safer.
 
Originally posted by: Pacfanweb
Originally posted by: IHateMyJob2004
Coming from Buffalo, all you see i nteh ditches is SUVs. So:
2. Better for snow?
BULL SH!T!! To stay out of the snow, you nmeed oto know how to drive. And if that's truely your concern, front wheel drive is 10 times better than 4 WD!

For that matter, AWD is almost as bad as 4 WD.

TWO BIG ADVERTSING GIMICS THAT ARE TOTAL BS!
FWD is NEVER better than 4WD in the snow. Ever. Anyone who says it is simply isn't credible.

AWD, I'm not a big fan of, but true 4WD can't be beat in the snow....there's no way that having 2 extra tires pulling you isn't better.


True, but you loose less Hp at withAwd as compaired to 4WD. But then agian, you loose Hp ether way with 4WD or AWD vehicles.
 
I drive a Honda CR-V. For a 4-cyl, the gas milage is not great, but it's certainly not a gas-guzzler either. Yeah, it's not a 'real' SUV, but the primary advantage is that it has far more space to move stuff than any sedan/hatchback, and more than most wagons. Head/leg space is great too, and the upright seating position is a plus for most people as it allows you to see ahead better on the road. Safety-wise, with most SUVs you're certainly as safe in them as any sedan, impact wise. And no, roll over is not a risk if you drive like a normal human being. Snow? I wouldn't agree with them being necessarily better in snow, but the high ground clearance means possibly better in deep snow where a sedan would have to plow. So yeah, bottom line, if you need the space, get it. If you won't ever need that space, I'd say don't.
 
Our ford excursion gets 11.5MPG and it has a 44 Gallon tank, that is not including the optional auxilary tank which doubles the base amount.

Yes, it costs a good deal to feed
 
Originally posted by: Last Rezort
True, but you loose less Hp at withAwd as compaired to 4WD. But then agian, you loose Hp ether way with 4WD or AWD vehicles.
Yep, you do. But generally folks with 4x4's aren't too concerned about a few horsepower. The only loss is from turning the extra weight the transfer case adds.
They generally build in enough to make up for that.
 
Originally posted by: Pacfanweb
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
An SUV is never safer than a sedan...does your friend ever read auto magazines or does he just base his opinion on some stupid "my SUV is trail rated" or the inane "professional grade crap" commercials?
Dumb statement. There might be certain times a sedan is safer, and others that the SUV is safer.
Depends on which SUV or sedan you're talking about. Don't make blanket statements when you don't know what you're talking about.

Wrong. Statistics have proven that a sedan is safer than an SUV. In certain situations an SUV might have advantages over a sedan but those situations are rare. Generally and statistically speaking you are much safer in a sedan than an SUV.
 
Originally posted by: Pacfanweb
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Nothing beats near 50/50 weight distribution, good snow tires and FWD in the snow. Unless you are driving off road where you need ground clearance this is all you need.
Except the same 50/50 distribution and 4wd. Sure, there are conditions when you can get around just fine with FWD, but there is a point that the 4x4 is superior, and even if you are getting about okay with FWD, a 4x4 is still more sure-footed and safer.

Show me one 4x4 truck/fullsize SUV with near 50/50 weight distribution. Doesn't matter anyway, all that weight works against you when driving on slippery surfaces. I've never driven a better mannered vehicle on slippery roads than that SAAB I owned. That thing was a tank and it was a great car in the snow.
 
Originally posted by: Pacfanweb
Originally posted by: nipplefish
Originally posted by: AgaBoogaBoo
My friend is looking for a new car, although he thinks an SUV will be safer than a sedan. I'll be showing him this thread.

i hate suv's. i drive as part of my job and one thing i've noticed is that in general, the larger the vehicle, the worse the driver. i don't know if it's the "safety factor" of driving a tank that makes people into reckless idiots or what. one way to increase safety is not to drive like a moron. and hell, gas is $2.30 a gallon right now, i wouldn't want to pay 50 bucks to fill that thing only to get 10 miles per gallon. and do you really NEED a vehicle that large? are you planning on taking it off-road? get a hybrid sedan.
I see the exact opposite. SUV's are generally not the vehicles you see weaving in and out of traffic, and flying down the road.
You simply don't like them, so you take note of it every time you see one driving badly.

i drive 600 miles a week, and SUV's are definetely the type of vehicle i most fear on the road, not because of their size, but because of their drivers. they drive too fast for their bulk, too recklessly when the situation calls for care, and too timidly when the situation calls for balls. people think they can drive them the same way they drive cars. but on top of driving too fast for their vehicle, they drive too slowly for the flow of traffic and block up the fast lanes, because their drivers BY DEFINITION don't give a flying fvck about anyone else on the road (otherwise they wouldn't endanger us with their battering rams). on top of that, these things handle so unbelievably mushily and numbly that most people drive them all slumped in their seat, like it's a couch, steering with their wrist and weaving around in their lane. i almost can't blame them, though, because it's hard to drive straight in any vehicle where you can turn the steering wheel several inches at highway speeds and not get any particularly noticable change in direction. they belong nowhere but the slow lane, doing 55 MPH. warning signs saying "i am a selfish sheep who is not paying attention to driving" wouldn't hurt, to warn tourists from other countries to give them a wide berth.

and yes, i've driven them. from wranglers and grand cherokees, right on up to escalades. i've driven them on the open freeway, i've driven them in deep snow. words cannot express how horribly these heaps of crap handle. you are literally no better off than you are in a freaking U-Haul or delivery truck, because at least the truck has appropriate suspension settings for a vehicle of that heft, instead of artificially softened up to save Mrs. Soccer Mom's 400 pound ass from being uncomfortable when she goes over speed bumps in the school parking lot. you are basically driving a big top heavy boat... you have to plan everything ahead. "ok, i'll have to brake soon, so i better start now, and i know i'll need to turn in a while, so i better start the turn now because it will take a long time for this thing to react..." that's all well and good... until someone pulls out in front of you. and then you kill them, because you turned the steering wheel, but unfortunately it's connected to rubber bands and so not much happened. even if it did result in an actual turning of the wheels, it wouldn't help much because the sidewalls would just roll over and you'd plow straight ahead, DSC pumping in a futile attempt to cheat the laws of physics... 3 tons just doesn't change direction at anything faster than a glacial pace.

oh, by the way. that escalade i drove was sent into an ABS and DSC hernia going DOWNHILL in the same snow that i successfully navigated my 1991 accord (no computer-controlled nuthin', summer tires, and no chains) UPHILL. in the end, i had to baby the escalade every bit if not more than my car. but i guess i was more of a MAN driving the escalade, so it was all good, right?

edit: the same accord has tackled unpaved logging and fires roads, hauled small boats to the lake up steep rutted dirt and mud roads and unpaved boat ramps, and hauled everything from big dogs, to band equipment, to moving 4 or 5 times. it gets 25 MPG after 183,000 miles, and it's that blur that just blew your fvcking doors off on the backroad.
 
Originally posted by: thomsbrain
edit: the same accord has tackled unpaved logging and fires roads, hauled small boats to the lake up steep rutted dirt and mud roads and unpaved boat ramps, and hauled everything from big dogs, to band equipment, to moving 4 or 5 times. it gets 25 MPG after 183,000 miles, and it's that blur that just blew your fvcking doors off on the backroad.
Hooray for Accords. I love my 88.

A wrangler is not an SUV. It's some sort of quasi-truck/roadster 4wd thing, a Jeep. And I don't know what was wrong with that Escelade you drove, but I drove a Suburban 4x4 about a year back that was the 2nd most sure-footed vehicle in the snow I've ever driven (first being my dad's 01 F150 ext cab 4x4 with sandbags in the bed). It also handled decent on dry pavement. Certainly not as agile as my (or your) Accord, but with a decent driver I'm sure most accidents could be avoided in it. I think you're just a hater due to the image the average american idiot driver has given the SUV. If anything, when on the freeway, I fear dam near everybody.
 
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: Pacfanweb
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Nothing beats near 50/50 weight distribution, good snow tires and FWD in the snow. Unless you are driving off road where you need ground clearance this is all you need.
Except the same 50/50 distribution and 4wd. Sure, there are conditions when you can get around just fine with FWD, but there is a point that the 4x4 is superior, and even if you are getting about okay with FWD, a 4x4 is still more sure-footed and safer.

Show me one 4x4 truck/fullsize SUV with near 50/50 weight distribution. Doesn't matter anyway, all that weight works against you when driving on slippery surfaces. I've never driven a better mannered vehicle on slippery roads than that SAAB I owned. That thing was a tank and it was a great car in the snow.
WTF are you talking about? The weight helps you get traction. It does everything BUT work against you. You contradicted yourself in your own statement. You say the weight works against you, then say the Saab was a tank and great in the snow...which implies it was heavy.
Why do you think people with pickups put weight in the rear? For traction.
A 4x4 is superior on slippery conditions to any other form of car, (AWD, FWD, RWD) every single time without fail.
It isn't even debatable.
And again, I'm not saying you can't get by okay with a FWD.....but the 4x4 is still better.
 
Originally posted by: thomsbrain
i hate suv's. i drive as part of my job and one thing i've noticed is that in general, the larger the vehicle, the worse the driver. i don't know if it's the "safety factor" of driving a tank that makes people into reckless idiots or what. one way to increase safety is not to drive like a moron. and hell, gas is $2.30 a gallon right now, i wouldn't want to pay 50 bucks to fill that thing only to get 10 miles per gallon. and do you really NEED a vehicle that large? are you planning on taking it off-road? get a hybrid sedan.
I see the exact opposite. SUV's are generally not the vehicles you see weaving in and out of traffic, and flying down the road.
You simply don't like them, so you take note of it every time you see one driving badly.[/quote]

i drive 600 miles a week, and SUV's are definetely the type of vehicle i most fear on the road, not because of their size, but because of their drivers. they drive too fast for their bulk, too recklessly when the situation calls for care, and too timidly when the situation calls for balls. people think they can drive them the same way they drive cars. but on top of driving too fast for their vehicle, they drive too slowly for the flow of traffic and block up the fast lanes, because their drivers BY DEFINITION don't give a flying fvck about anyone else on the road (otherwise they wouldn't endanger us with their battering rams). on top of that, these things handle so unbelievably mushily and numbly that most people drive them all slumped in their seat, like it's a couch, steering with their wrist and weaving around in their lane. i almost can't blame them, though, because it's hard to drive straight in any vehicle where you can turn the steering wheel several inches at highway speeds and not get any particularly noticable change in direction. they belong nowhere but the slow lane, doing 55 MPH. warning signs saying "i am a selfish sheep who is not paying attention to driving" wouldn't hurt, to warn tourists from other countries to give them a wide berth.

and yes, i've driven them. from wranglers and grand cherokees, right on up to escalades. i've driven them on the open freeway, i've driven them in deep snow. words cannot express how horribly these heaps of crap handle. you are literally no better off than you are in a freaking U-Haul or delivery truck, because at least the truck has appropriate suspension settings for a vehicle of that heft, instead of artificially softened up to save Mrs. Soccer Mom's 400 pound ass from being uncomfortable when she goes over speed bumps in the school parking lot. you are basically driving a big top heavy boat... you have to plan everything ahead. "ok, i'll have to brake soon, so i better start now, and i know i'll need to turn in a while, so i better start the turn now because it will take a long time for this thing to react..." that's all well and good... until someone pulls out in front of you. and then you kill them, because you turned the steering wheel, but unfortunately it's connected to rubber bands and so not much happened. even if it did result in an actual turning of the wheels, it wouldn't help much because the sidewalls would just roll over and you'd plow straight ahead, DSC pumping in a futile attempt to cheat the laws of physics... 3 tons just doesn't change direction at anything faster than a glacial pace.

oh, by the way. that escalade i drove was sent into an ABS and DSC hernia going DOWNHILL in the same snow that i successfully navigated my 1991 accord (no computer-controlled nuthin', summer tires, and no chains) UPHILL. in the end, i had to baby the escalade every bit if not more than my car. but i guess i was more of a MAN driving the escalade, so it was all good, right?

edit: the same accord has tackled unpaved logging and fires roads, hauled small boats to the lake up steep rutted dirt and mud roads and unpaved boat ramps, and hauled everything from big dogs, to band equipment, to moving 4 or 5 times. it gets 25 MPG after 183,000 miles, and it's that blur that just blew your fvcking doors off on the backroad.[/quote]
You are simply wrong. There aren't more bad SUV drivers, they are just more noticeable, and you don't like them so that's why you notice.
You make a lot of generalizations about soccer moms, who tend to be some of the safest drivers on the road, due to their cargo.
You simply don't like them.
And I'm glad you like your Accord. They are good cars. I don't have one, because they can't do what I need my car to do.
 
Originally posted by: Raduque
Originally posted by: thomsbrain
edit: the same accord has tackled unpaved logging and fires roads, hauled small boats to the lake up steep rutted dirt and mud roads and unpaved boat ramps, and hauled everything from big dogs, to band equipment, to moving 4 or 5 times. it gets 25 MPG after 183,000 miles, and it's that blur that just blew your fvcking doors off on the backroad.
Hooray for Accords. I love my 88.

A wrangler is not an SUV. It's some sort of quasi-truck/roadster 4wd thing, a Jeep. And I don't know what was wrong with that Escelade you drove, but I drove a Suburban 4x4 about a year back that was the 2nd most sure-footed vehicle in the snow I've ever driven (first being my dad's 01 F150 ext cab 4x4 with sandbags in the bed). It also handled decent on dry pavement. Certainly not as agile as my (or your) Accord, but with a decent driver I'm sure most accidents could be avoided in it. I think you're just a hater due to the image the average american idiot driver has given the SUV. If anything, when on the freeway, I fear dam near everybody.

You nailed it.
And you're right about the Suburban. I have a Suburban and two Tahoes, and they are awesome in the snow. I had 3 Broncos before that, and they were pretty good, too.
My Jeep CJ-7 goes great, but isn't as sure-footed since it's not as heavy....but is almost unbeatable on trails, though.
 
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: Pacfanweb
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
An SUV is never safer than a sedan...does your friend ever read auto magazines or does he just base his opinion on some stupid "my SUV is trail rated" or the inane "professional grade crap" commercials?
Dumb statement. There might be certain times a sedan is safer, and others that the SUV is safer.
Depends on which SUV or sedan you're talking about. Don't make blanket statements when you don't know what you're talking about.

Wrong. Statistics have proven that a sedan is safer than an SUV. In certain situations an SUV might have advantages over a sedan but those situations are rare. Generally and statistically speaking you are much safer in a sedan than an SUV.
Link to the stats?
Edit: And percentage-wise, I bet that more people die in car wrecks than SUV wrecks.
 
without reading the whole thread it comes down to this:

if you want something to drive and a sedan would fulfill all of the functions you need getting an SUV to be "safer" is silly. IF you are in a crash you'll probably be better off but I feel the other cons of an SUV when a sedan will do more than outweight it's value:

1. more expensive to insure
2. rolls over easier
3. horrible mpg (monetary as well as ethical issue for me)
4. heavier - harder to stop
5. gives perceived safety which causes people to not drive as safely as they should in poor weather and in general
6. generally more expensive
7. less maneuverable (not as fun to drive and harder to avoid an accident)
8. a b!tch to parallel park and generally squeeze into tight spots
9. don't fit down very narrow streets easily (an issue if one lives in a city)
10. i'll be annoyed at you when i can't see around your monster of a vehicle
 
Originally posted by: Tommunist
without reading the whole thread it comes down to this:

if you want something to drive and a sedan would fulfill all of the functions you need getting an SUV to be "safer" is silly. IF you are in a crash you'll probably be better off but I feel the other cons of an SUV when a sedan will do more than outweight it's value:

1. more expensive to insure
2. rolls over easier
3. horrible mpg (monetary as well as ethical issue for me)
4. heavier - harder to stop
5. gives perceived safety which causes people to not drive as safely as they should in poor weather and in general
6. generally more expensive
7. less maneuverable (not as fun to drive and harder to avoid an accident)
8. a b!tch to parallel park and generally squeeze into tight spots
9. don't fit down very narrow streets easily (an issue if one lives in a city)
10. i'll be annoyed at you when i can't see around your monster of a vehicle

11. suvs are just plain ugly



 
Originally posted by: 733SHiFTY
Originally posted by: Tommunist
without reading the whole thread it comes down to this:

if you want something to drive and a sedan would fulfill all of the functions you need getting an SUV to be "safer" is silly. IF you are in a crash you'll probably be better off but I feel the other cons of an SUV when a sedan will do more than outweight it's value:

1. more expensive to insure
2. rolls over easier
3. horrible mpg (monetary as well as ethical issue for me)
4. heavier - harder to stop
5. gives perceived safety which causes people to not drive as safely as they should in poor weather and in general
6. generally more expensive
7. less maneuverable (not as fun to drive and harder to avoid an accident)
8. a b!tch to parallel park and generally squeeze into tight spots
9. don't fit down very narrow streets easily (an issue if one lives in a city)
10. i'll be annoyed at you when i can't see around your monster of a vehicle

11. suvs are just plain ugly

True, but don't forget roadpenis++.

Unfortunately, also impliedselfimageofpenis--.
 
Originally posted by: IHateMyJob2004
95% of the time, you won't have otehr people in the car. SUV Why?
Please be smart enough not to start this crap. Nobody NEEDS to do 0-60 in < 10 seconds 99.9% of the time either but they still buy sports cars.

It's not ONLY about need. It's about buying enough to be practical. 75% of the time I'm in my SUV alone also. But I can't tell you how many times (more than I can count) that I was able to come back from Home Depot and didn't have to sweat storage space, while carrying passengers. And I can't tell you the amount of times I enjoyed my 4WD in Buffalo (in the 4.5 years I lived there). I also moved my brother-in-law out of his dorm room and 150 miles back home with 1-car load, and both of us in it. It comes in handy... as a car, and as a utility vehicle.

It would be fine to have a regular car since I don't NEED an SUV XX.XX% of the time, but it's there when we need it and that is a desirable factor. We buy a bigger house because one day we will have kids... same idea.
 
Back
Top