Professor says Vampires a mathematical impossibility

Bateluer

Lifer
Jun 23, 2001
27,730
8
0
Article

Apparently he forgot that in most Vampire mythos that the vampire must feed the human vampire blood AFTER the human has been drained to the brink of death in order for the human to rise as a vampire themselves.

The only major Vampire setting I'm aware of that doesn't require the human to drink vampire blood first is the Blade series. And even in the Blade series, if the vampire drains the human entirely, the human will die and not rise. Also, there is only a chance, albeit a good one, that the human will turn if the vampire leaves the human alive.
 

SilthDraeth

Platinum Member
Oct 28, 2003
2,635
0
71
OP - Good find.

I agree that the "proof" is based off of only partial understanding of vampire lore. I don't happen to believe that there are in fact really Vampires, but if you are going to try to disprove anything, you should have more than a token understanding of the subject.

However to the OP, there are actually a lot of stories that support the idea of being bitten alone is enough to turn someone into a vampire. There are a lot as well, that require the Vampire to feed the human their own blood in order to turn them.

There is also plenty of lore to suggest that Vampires can feed off of any animal to survive, and not just humans. And by doing so they would not be turning the entire worlds population as quick as that math theory states.

 

Bateluer

Lifer
Jun 23, 2001
27,730
8
0
Originally posted by: SilthDraeth


There is also plenty of lore to suggest that Vampires can feed off of any animal to survive, and not just humans. And by doing so they would not be turning the entire worlds population as quick as that math theory states.

That only adds to the problem though. Would vampirism be transmitted to the animal, resulting in entire populations of vampirific animals?

Originally posted by: StevenYoo
<ogre> nEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEERRRRRRRRRDDDS </ogre>

Where!?
 

UncleWai

Diamond Member
Oct 23, 2001
5,701
68
91
The professor proved Captain Obvious exists rather than vampires cannot exist.
 

thomsbrain

Lifer
Dec 4, 2001
18,148
1
0
holy crap, this thread is the nerdiest thing i have seen in at least a month, maybe more. and i just went to a party where watching star trek was the main activity.
 

mercanucaribe

Banned
Oct 20, 2004
9,763
1
0
That's ridiculous. The person has to drink the vampire's blood to turn into a vampire. You can't turn into a vampire from being bitten by one. Worst proof EVER.
 

LordMaul

Lifer
Nov 16, 2000
15,168
1
0
I always thought it was either partially by chance or sort of up to the vampire. For instance, IIRC, in the old Dracula movies, sometimes the vampire would bite some hot wommanz and she would die, then he would bite someone else the same way and poof, another vampire. Unless I'm missing something. Which is possible.
 

CollectiveUnconscious

Senior member
Jan 27, 2006
587
0
0
Originally posted by: Bateluer

That only adds to the problem though. Would vampirism be transmitted to the animal, resulting in entire populations of vampirific animals?

Vampire bats. There's a hell of alot of them.
 

rikadik

Senior member
Dec 30, 2004
649
0
0
I can't actually believe that someone would set about trying to disprove something which is clearly rubbish. Seriously, if you believe that sort of stuff, you're an idiot. Period!
 

dmw16

Diamond Member
Nov 12, 2000
7,608
0
0
no wonder college is so expensive. there are professors doing very valuable research.
 

Bateluer

Lifer
Jun 23, 2001
27,730
8
0
Originally posted by: evident
what if a vampire bit a person w/ aids?

Depending on the mythos, Vampires cannot be afflicted with any human diseases, but they can become temporary careers for blood borne diseases.