It's a lazy way of speaking and it hurts the diversity of your language.
How in the hell did you come to that conclusion? (I obviously strongly disagree.)
"Dad was fucking around under the hood of one of the tractors again."
I feel that this is sufficiently brief, and conveys my anger or disgust toward dad for trying to "fix" a tractor.
"Dad was working under the hood of one of the tractors again."
Doesn't convey the severity of the statement.
"Dad, in his usual manner of grievous stupidity, was seen doing something under the hood of one of the tractors, again."
Too long, and while it attempts to convey the severity, does not.
I can't think of any non-profane manner to properly express my feelings about "dad", in this context, without being exceptionally verbose.
See also
http://www.osnews.com/story/19266/WTFs_m. I challenge you to come up with something other than "wtf", that conveys the implied sentiment to a broad audience.
Also, since when is being lazy a bad thing? I'm a sysadmin. I strive to be lazy in everything I do -- if something can be scripted, completed, said, or otherwise done faster or more accurately than it's currently being done, there's no reason not to strive for greater laziness.
Sounding dumb is just a matter of opinion, though. Who the fuck cares what you think.
<edit>

</edit>