Hi guys, here are the results. The post only has some basic sample results since the big tables don't format well, but full data is in the link.
Pretty typical for what you would expect from the discussions we see on the forums. Acer rated low for quality, Apple high quality, but a poor value. Intel rates very high for CPU quality. Lots of smartphone and desktop users, with most people over 3.0 GHz.
Thanks so much!
https://www.surveymonkey.com/sr.aspx?sm=2w3XEeBn6ETu7JvnxaKbPrntM8HHXJDPK_2fxJMVVJF_2fM_3d
1) Computing Devices Used, 142 Responses
Desktop, 90.1%, 128
Smartphone, 82.4%, 117
Laptop, 66.9%, 95
Tablet, 43.0%, 61
Old console, 24.6%, 35
Ultrabook, 16.2%, 23
MP3 Player, 15.5%, 22
Ereader, 10.6%, 15
New console, 7.0%, 10
Wearable, 3.5%, 5
5) Importance of Processor Brand
Very unimportant, 21.4%, 30
Somewhat unimportant, 13.6%, 19
Somewhat important, 27.9%, 39
Very important, 37.1%, 52
8) Does having an Intel processor make you more or less likely to buy it?
Less likely to buy it, 8.2%, 11
Does not make a difference, 43.3%, 58
More likely to buy it, 48.5%, 65
9) How fast is the processor of the device that you use most?
Don't know the speed, 7.0%, 10
less than 1.0 GHz, 0.7%, 1
between 1.0 and 1.49 GHz, 0.7%, 1
between 1.5 and 1.99 GHz, 2.1%, 3
between 2.0 and 2.49 GHz, 9.2%, 13
between 2.5 and 2.99 GHz, 14.1%, 20
Over 3.0 GHz, 66.2%, 94
10) Age, Male or Female
Under age 18, 75.0% (3), 25.0% (1)
18 to 24, 92.9% (26), 7.1% (2)
25 to 29, 87.5% (28), 12.5% (4)
30 to 39, 93.5% (58), 6.5% (4)
40 to 49, 93.3% (14), 6.7% (1)
50 to 59, 100.0% (8), 0.0% (0)
60 to 69, 83.3% (5), 16.7% (1)
70 or over, 66.7% (2), 33.3% (1)