VirtualLarry
No Lifer
- Aug 25, 2001
- 56,355
- 10,050
- 126
Just checked the scores before bed and thought it appropriate to say:
Nice Tony! We're actually ahead of HOCP, for however long that lasts, anyway.
Just checked the scores before bed and thought it appropriate to say:
Is it overheating and throttling? Is it unstable, so LLR is trying slower compute methods?On my G4400 @ 4.455, they were like 82hours estimated. I don't get it.
Looks like I'm not going to finish on time. BOINC ETAs have it running a half day too long
I will get four more done. Another 10 will be real close, most likely will miss the deadline
If you're on a Core2-era platform (Xeon, right?), then memory bandwidth might be an issue if you are running four tasks. You might be able to set your compute preferences to only run 50% of available CPUs (two cores), and those tasks might complete faster, if you had four running at once.
I still say try dropping your OC to 4 or 4.2GHz. You might be surprised at the result. I suspect your system is unstable, and LLR is trying older computing methods, or restarting a lot.I'm still trying to figure out how my 2.7Ghz Haswell G1820 (in Linux Mint 17.3 with an updated kernel), can crunch these WUs in 56hrs, and my G4400 Skylake @ 4.455 takes 80hrs.
I still say try dropping your OC to 4 or 4.2GHz. You might be surprised at the result. I suspect your system is unstable, and LLR is trying older computing methods, or restarting a lot.
You pay attention to this too, OK. Even if you don't have a Core2. All the quad-cores seem memory-limited on this.
Fortunately, I expect to get 15 more done, so I don't expect you to catch me. :sneaky:
P.S. Did you notice Cullens seem slightly faster than Woodalls? With proportionately less credit, I assume.
I still say try dropping your OC to 4 or 4.2GHz. You might be surprised at the result. I suspect your system is unstable, and LLR is trying older computing methods, or restarting a lot.