9554P @400W PPT which xii5ku rented out to parsnip:
(runs at something like 3.4+ GHz on average, IIRC, can't check right now)
8 tasks x 8 threads each, each task bound to the lower 8 logical CPUs of an exclusive CCX,
31 results from the last 24 hours: 25,390 / 22,549 / 31,368 seconds elapsed time (avg/min/max) = 7:03 / 6:16 / 8:43 h:mm
I did not take the time yet to check what would happen if I used SMT. I believe I would have to tweak my PRST test script first for more precision to know for sure. Also, RAM is currently dialed down to 3600 DDR IIRC, down from 4800 DDR originally, without having tested the effect on GCW-LLR/PRST. I left it this way because PRST should be mostly accessing the CPU cache. (Too little spare time to go better informed into this challenge...)
Zen 3, such as EPYC 7003/ Milan, should still fare well in this challenge because it has enough cache if configured near to optimum. I have no idea if Windows + Lasso work decently on a 2x64c dual socket system in particular. Anyway, keep in mind that a 64-cores EPYC 7003 has quite some less Watts/core than a 64-cores EPYC 9004 at its disposal, and for this reason alone should be noticeably slower at same core count. (Besides Genoa's improved instruction set support and more tweaks to the core and newer manufacturing process node.)
It's only day 1.5 yet, but nonetheless:
Rank__
Credits____
Team
1_____
37,317,051___
TeAm AnandTech
2_____
12,683,762___Czech National Team
3_____
11,415,652___Antarctic Crunchers
4_____
9,172,441____SETI.Germany
12.7 +
11.4 +
9.2 =
33.3 M
Mark's still ahead of SETI Germany.
:
-O