And even the left leaning MSNBC will spend 75% of their time covering Trump. I’m going to go insane.I know let me explain better. Once there is an established candidate attempting to run against the President everything will be amped up.
And even the left leaning MSNBC will spend 75% of their time covering Trump. I’m going to go insane.I know let me explain better. Once there is an established candidate attempting to run against the President everything will be amped up.
Can it get amped up any further? Trump will destroy anyone who runs against him, unless something happens to the economy, Mueller's report comes out, or a war breaks out.I know let me explain better. Once there is an established candidate attempting to run against the President everything will be amped up.
Can it get amped up any further? Trump will destroy anyone who runs against him, unless something happens to the economy, Mueller's report comes out, or a war breaks out.
Can it get amped up any further?
How many babies a year are classified as anchor babies?
What are the demographics of these children? What does the data say? How was it collected?
Midway thru this story - Trump says border troops could hit 15K, surprising Pentagon - I found this gem:
Trump insisted the media is underestimating the caravans. “You have caravans coming up that look a lot larger than it’s reported actually. I’m pretty good at estimating crowd size. And I’ll tell you they look a lot bigger than people would think,” he told ABC.
Lol...
And his base is scared to death as usual. For always acting like tough guys, they are the biggest snowflakes of all.Trump is apparently now scheduled to give "remarks on immigration" form the Roosevelt Room this afternoon.
He doesn't have anything to sell for the midterms but fear, fear, and more fear.
And his base is scared to death as usual. For always acting like tough guys, they are the biggest snowflakes of all.
I heard that too, what he's doing there is bolstering his ego as is always the case.They've already voted also so continuing this seems pointless except to potentially alienate anybody still on the fence. He asked people at his rally last night if they already voted and when they all raised their hands asked "what the hell he was doing there".
@Fanatical Meat
and where did I lose you
did you fall off my pocket or something
maybe there is a hole in it
even so I don't put meat in there
Mostly state owned news organization, not as bad as RT but I don’t like to pay attention to them.
And his base is scared to death as usual. For always acting like tough guys, they are the biggest snowflakes of all.
Trump is apparently now scheduled to give "remarks on immigration" form the Roosevelt Room this afternoon.
He doesn't have anything to sell for the midterms but fear, fear, and more fear.
Luis Bracamontes, Cop-Killer in Trump’s Twitter Video, Actually Came Back to U.S. Under Bush
Trump also failed to mention that Bracamontes used an AR-15, a weapon that Republicans, including the president, don’t want to outlaw.
President Trump tweeted out a video on Wednesday designed to gin up fears of illegal immigration prior to the midterm elections. The spot, which drew comparisons to the infamous Willie Horton ad for its bigoted undertones, featured Luis Bracamontes, an undocumented immigrant who has been convicted and sentenced to death for murdering two deputies in Sacramento, California:
“Democrats Let him stay!” the ad declares.
And: “It is outrageous what the Democrats are doing to our Country. Vote Republican now!”
Except, that’s not the story.
Bracamontes was first deported to his native Mexico in 1997, during the Clinton administration, after he was busted selling drugs. But, according to U.S. Immigration officials, Bracamontes managed return to the United States by 2001, when he was deported a second time for being in the country illegally. That was during the first year of the Bush administration.
Bracamontes was back in America again by 2002. He married a U.S. citizen and remained in the country even as the Bush administration deported people at a record rate, topped only by the Obama administration.
When Bracamontes shot and killed the two deputies in 2014, he had been deported once under a Democratic administration and once under a Republican administration. He had been back in the United States for at least six years during the Bush administration and five years under the Obama administration.
Trump’s video also fails to mention that Bracamontes murdered the deputies with an AR-15 assault rifle, which both he and the Republicans have long resisted banning.
The AR-15 has been the weapon of choice for high-profile mass shooters. It was used by the manic who murdered 11 people in a synagogue in Pittsburgh this past weekend. He was a native born American and, unlike Bracamontes, was not featured in any Trump video or tweet.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/luis-...ter-video-actually-came-back-to-us-under-bush
Does anyone have actual information?
Please, no youtube videos or editorial or commentary.
Looking for hard verifiable data.
I would imagine it would be by analyzing birth certificates and immigration cases where it is confirmed that both parents were in the US illegally at the time of birth.
If this is a real issue, then someone must have performed a study.
I sometimes wonder if I'm the only person here who can use Google properly. Try "how many achors babies are born in the US every year?"
You can skip the breitbart link and go here:
http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tan...n-in-u-s-to-unauthorized-immigrants-declines/
Explains how the data was collected and everything.
It should be noted that the majority of these are not what we would call "anchor babies." My understanding that the term refers to "birth tourism" where people come to visit/vaction then have a baby here, then later apply for citizenship for the parent because their child is a US citizen. Most of these are people who came here illegally, then had kids, but are obviously not applying for citizenship while living here illegally.
I sometimes wonder if I'm the only person here who can use Google properly. Try "how many achors babies are born in the US every year?"
You can skip the breitbart link and go here:
http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tan...n-in-u-s-to-unauthorized-immigrants-declines/
Explains how the data was collected and everything.
It should be noted that the majority of these are not what we would call "anchor babies." My understanding that the term refers to "birth tourism" where people come to visit/vaction then have a baby here, then later apply for citizenship for the parent because their child is a US citizen. Most of these are people who came here illegally, then had kids, but are obviously not applying for citizenship while living here illegally.
And to be clear 'later apply for citizenship' from my understanding is when that baby turns 21.
Mostly state owned news organization, not as bad as RT but I don’t like to pay attention to them.