President is really winding up the anti-immigrant crowd - order to end birthright citizenship

Page 13 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,934
55,284
136
I dunno man. Trump has fulfilled many promises given.

https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/trumpometer/

Not really, if anything he’s massively broken most of his biggest promises.

Hell, 3 of the 5 primary promises from your link are broken.

1) He not only failed to repeal the ACA, his actual promise was to get everyone better and cheaper health care while protecting people with pre-existing conditions. Instead he actively sabotaged people’s health insurance and is currently trying to remove protections for pre-existing conditions.

2) No wall, and Mexico laughed in his face about paying for it.

3) He did this, kind of, except he exempted a number of the actual exporters of terrorism. (Saudi Arabia)

4) Trump’s tax plain actually raises lots of people’s taxes in the long term. It only permanently cuts them for rich people.

5) He sure did!

Seems like a pretty horrendous record to me? I mean he’s actually doing the opposite of what he promises.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aegeon

Meghan54

Lifer
Oct 18, 2009
11,684
5,228
136
I dunno man. Trump has fulfilled many promises given.

https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/trumpometer/

So, essentially not much that wasn't accomplished without an EO. The few significant accomplishments, like the tax cut, should've been labeled a broken promise given the Repubs. are now claiming they're going to introduce an actual middle class tax cut next year, so that means the $1.5T wasn't for the middle class at all, right?

Oh, and the SC justices. That's about it for serious accomplishments......
 

blackangst1

Lifer
Feb 23, 2005
22,902
2,359
126
Not really, if anything he’s massively broken most of his biggest promises.

Hell, 3 of the 5 primary promises from your link are broken.

1) He not only failed to repeal the ACA, his actual promise was to get everyone better and cheaper health care while protecting people with pre-existing conditions. Instead he actively sabotaged people’s health insurance and is currently trying to remove protections for pre-existing conditions.

2) No wall, and Mexico laughed in his face about paying for it.

3) He did this, kind of, except he exempted a number of the actual exporters of terrorism. (Saudi Arabia)

4) Trump’s tax plain actually raises lots of people’s taxes in the long term. It only permanently cuts them for rich people.

5) He sure did!

Seems like a pretty horrendous record to me? I mean he’s actually doing the opposite of what he promises.

So to you, compromise and in the works = broken?

Alright then.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,934
55,284
136
So to you, compromise and in the works = broken?

Alright then.

1) Repealing Obamacare is ‘in the works’? It’s dead as a door nail and you know it. As I said though, Trump’s broken promise here is much worse than just not repealing the ACA. He actively drove up people’s health care prices and tried to remove pre-existing condition protections.

It’s not just a broken promise because he failed, he did the opposite.

2) Making Mexico pay for the wall? Dead as a door nail and you know it.

3) ‘Compromise’ on the tax cut bill is ridiculous. Not only is everyone not getting a tax cut, most Americans are getting a tax INCREASE.

By all means though tell me where I got something wrong here. Trump played conservatives for fools.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aegeon

blackangst1

Lifer
Feb 23, 2005
22,902
2,359
126
1) Repealing Obamacare is ‘in the works’? It’s dead as a door nail and you know it. As I said though, Trump’s broken promise here is much worse than just not repealing the ACA. He actively drove up people’s health care prices and tried to remove pre-existing condition protections.

It’s not just a broken promise because he failed, he did the opposite.

2) Making Mexico pay for the wall? Dead as a door nail and you know it.

3) ‘Compromise’ on the tax cut bill is ridiculous. Not only is everyone not getting a tax cut, most Americans are getting a tax INCREASE.

By all means though tell me where I got something wrong here. Trump played conservatives for fools.
Ok, so, through your own reasoning, your answer is yes.

Np. Just wanted to clarify.
 

Meghan54

Lifer
Oct 18, 2009
11,684
5,228
136
Ok, so, through your own reasoning, your answer is yes.

Np. Just wanted to clarify.

So, what clarity did you obtain.....your refusal to address anything fskimospy posted that you've "responded" to with that post of verbal diarrhea?
 
  • Like
Reactions: rise

woolfe9998

Lifer
Apr 8, 2013
16,242
14,243
136
Hilarious spoof by the New Yorker:

WASHINGTON (The Borowitz Report)—Calling it “maybe the worst deal ever,” Donald J. Trump said on Wednesday that he is considering pulling the United States out of the United States Constitution.

“I’ve seen a lot of bad deals in my life, but this Constitution is a total mess,” he said. “We need to tear it up and start over.”

Trump was scathing in his remarks about the two-hundred-and-twenty-nine-year-old document, singling out for special scorn its insistence on three branches of government. “The branches thing is maybe the worst part of this deal,” he said. “The first thing we do when we pull out of the Constitution is get rid of two of those branches.”

He also called the First Amendment “something that really has to go.”

“No one in his right mind would put something like that in a Constitution,” he said. “Russia doesn’t have it. North Korea doesn’t have it. All the best countries don’t have it.”

He stopped short of accusing his predecessor, Barack Obama, of writing the United States Constitution, but said, “He’s working hard behind the scenes trying to save it, because he knows that the Constitution is very, very bad for me.”

Vowing to replace the Constitution with “a new, much, much better Constitution,” he acknowledged that there might be some elements of the original document worth salvaging. “We’re going to keep the Second Amendment,” he said, “and definitely the Fifth.”

The sad part is, he could have actually said all of these things and no one would think it out of character. How do you parody someone who is already a parody of himself?
 

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,772
6,336
126
Hilarious spoof by the New Yorker:



The sad part is, he could have actually said all of these things and no one would think it out of character. How do you parody someone who is already a parody of himself?

The Senate and the Courts have been robbing us blind!
 

theeedude

Lifer
Feb 5, 2006
35,787
6,197
126
If you are an American with foreign born parents, get out and vote, while you still can. You can be stripped of your citizenship at any time by this dictator wannabe and his crew of idiots.
 

woolfe9998

Lifer
Apr 8, 2013
16,242
14,243
136
  • Like
Reactions: Engineer and Aegeon

GodisanAtheist

Diamond Member
Nov 16, 2006
8,309
9,684
136
Starship Troopers was pointing out the dangers of fascism...

-Starship Troopers the movie did parody fascism, but the book most certainly does not and it is a criticism that is (not entirely unjustly) leveled against the book.

Not sure if you've read the book, but it's nothing like the movie and a really great piece of classic 50's Sci-Fi. Also one of the earliest and best examples of space marines in powered armor vs. alien bugs.

The core tenent that Heinlein is going for is that anything that is not earned is inherently worthless, so citizenship freely given is meaningless. In his society, citizenship is earned through a 4 year tour of duty in service to the state (as anything, from a soldier to a scientist to a farmer to being a lab rat) and after that service is completed, citizenship is granted and a higher level of civics is acheived merely by the sacrifice made to earn that citizenship.

It's not some airtight manifesto or anything, but there is a kind of intelligence and logic behind the thought that I can appreciate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pcgeek11

pcgeek11

Lifer
Jun 12, 2005
22,329
4,971
136
I haven't read this entire thread, but didn't Harry Reid also reject the notion of anchor babies back in 1993.

And no I don't think Trump can fix the 14th amendment with an Exec Order. I agree with what Harry Reid said in 1993, it still should be fixed.
 

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
33,494
16,975
136
I haven't read this entire thread, but didn't Harry Reid also reject the notion of anchor babies back in 1993.

And no I don't think Trump can fix the 14th amendment with an Exec Order. I agree with what Harry Reid said in 1993, it still should be fixed.

I'm curious why you didn't bother linking to what Reid said (someone who is no longer in Congress, btw). Apparently you have an awesome memory and can remember what a senator said some 25 years ago said and you aren't just repeating a talking point you recently heard.
 

pcgeek11

Lifer
Jun 12, 2005
22,329
4,971
136
I'm curious why you didn't bother linking to what Reid said (someone who is no longer in Congress, btw). Apparently you have an awesome memory and can remember what a senator said some 25 years ago said and you aren't just repeating a talking point you recently heard.

Yes, I did see a video of it recently.Is that a problem for you?
Does that make the point invalid that it was 25 years ago or that he is no longer in DC?