Yes, posting results in a result posting thread is so epeen of me isn't it? Funny how it runs no better at high than it does ultra. Yet again your advice sucks, what a surprise.
I've got a 4890 lightly overclocked and am having really low frames, even playing in a small window and with settings at low. I know the card is showing it's age, but would have thought much better results with it.Anyone else with a HD4800 card that gets terrible performance? Saw quite many claim to have problem with the performance, seems like the drivers for the HD4000 series are broken for this game
Anyone else with a HD4800 card that gets terrible performance? Saw quite many claim to have problem with the performance, seems like the drivers for the HD4000 series are broken for this game
1440x900 on low 35-65fps average about 45 or so with a 720 core oc on a 9800gtx 512mb .
Find myself playing with the aa guns in base the most silky smooth fps and like taking down the jet's :thumbsup:
Would love hunting for campers but at 1440x900 on low its so pixed i never see someone in a bush especially at a distance.
Max resolution for a oced 9800gtx is 1440x900 on low...anything on medium vram max's out and the game hardlock's appears any resolution low is as good as it gets...
Edit=BC2 in all its glory can't handle such a minor oc....not the 760 core i used before...but BF3 can handle any oc? I game in BC2 any oc i do fails within 10 mins and the game whites out...in BF3 i'm gaming for hours at 720 core...what gives?IF any game is gonna stress the gpu...it would be BF3.
I have had that issue before as well. It seems like some games are more tolerant of OC'd clocks than others.
It is the stupid beta drivers and my 9800gtx...even at stock issues with BC2 and no matter what tweaks settings i do and how many fresh clean installs...its a issue that doesn't go away till i roll back to 266.58 which isn't compatible with BF3 .
Last night i had to make up my mind 266.58 and BC2 or 285.38 and BF3 and i just uninstalled BC2 cause i'm not even gonna bother reinstalling 266.58 for the sake of a single video game while all others work fine .
apparently all you need is a gt220 ddr2 to run on ultra settings with 4x MSAA...http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZzDHqjlqppk
it has to be BS. a gt220 is barely any faster than my 8600gt. it is not even half as fast as the 8800gt which is the minimum card needed to play. even at 1024 there would be no way he could max every setting and use 4x MSAA. there is some nut on the Steam forums right now claiming he can max BF 3 on his gt220.
My first beta experience ever and not to shabby.
Good two weeks and Caspian Border was what sold me...i went into Metro for the hell of it last night for change...got stuck on a server with EVERYONE in a bush....
Found myself in a bush too cause there was no one out in the open took about 3 mins till i felt like a idiot and i just left....Metro and Battlebush 3 won't work now Caspian and Battlefield 3 will![]()
My first beta experience ever and not to shabby.
Good two weeks and Caspian Border was what sold me...i went into Metro for the hell of it last night for change...got stuck on a server with EVERYONE in a bush....
Found myself in a bush too cause there was no one out in the open took about 3 mins till i felt like a idiot and i just left....Metro and Battlebush 3 won't work now Caspian and Battlefield 3 will![]()
And all of this without hardware related proprietary crap. Who would have thought! Go eat a donut Nvidia!