• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Post your Cpumark99 scores

Page 13 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Yeah the max it does is 3.7GHz on all cores when loaded, it's a non k model.Most demanding thing it does is handle BF4 and it does that very well.🙂

Yes, but CPUMark99 is only single threaded, so your CPU should be running this bench on a core @ 3.9GHz.

I also have a 3770 (non-K), they can turbo two cores up to 3.9GHz, see my post/CPU-Z screenshot, 2 cores @ 3.9. 🙂
 
Last edited:
FX 8120 @ 4.0

446

ASO64DA.jpg
 
Last edited:
i7 4790K @ 4600 Mhz (Cache @ 4500 Mhz) : 793
LOL @ entry 42 in the chart, I didn't know it's possible to reach 5000 mhz with that processor
042 SlowSpyder 616 FX-9370 5280 0.11667 8.57143
2500K really shines at 5000+
 
Last edited:
X5680 @ 4.7 710

173.89 x 27

Not worried about the chart, just dld it and ran it for grins and giggles 🙂

Bit of a Necro I guess.
 
Last edited:
Are you serious Guskline?
Yes just reran and 757 is the score.

I know my 5960x is running at 4.4 Ghz (aida64 Extreme scores verify i.e. CPU Queen=98889!:awe:

As OP said, this is an old single threaded benchmark utility.

BTW Burpo, what's your Aida 64 Extreme CPU Queen score with your Xeon at 4.8Ghz?
 
Last edited:
I didn't think ST performance was that good on mine (about par w/3770k) and I just assumed the 5960X would beat it.
 
766 with a 4790K at 4.4ghz.

I have a G3258 that I got up to 4.8ghz before. It might get close to 800 given the example above at 4.6ghz.
 
Back
Top