Post your Cpumark99 scores

[SlowSpyder]

I wish... Not stable there I believe due to uncontrollable vdroop because MSI didn't think that'd be a useful feature in their big overclocking board. :whiste:

And it never seemed to peg any of my cores either for whatever that's worth.

 

[CakeMonster]

i7 4770K @ 3.9GHz: 675

Any more HW results?

 

[Tristor]

i5-4670k@4.4GHz: 760

 

[Conroe]

Xeon E5450@4.2ghz DDR2 934@5-6-6-22 = 605

 

[gbeirn]

241 For a Haswell based Celeron 2955U. 1.4GHz Dual Core 2MB Cache

 

[Edgemeal]

No surprise I guess that all the Haswell's are at the top in Points Per Mhz.
Updated lists here

 

[fastman]

681, not bad I guess.

 

[mojothehut]

719
i7 4770k @ 4.2

 

[Burpo]

 

[Chiropteran]

159 on Dell Venue 8 Pro, Atom Z3740D 1.33ghz (1.8ghz turbo)

 

[blake0812]

Phenom II 945


212

Is that good?

 

[Scholzpdx]

I just noticed that I am the only one with a completely round, even number of Mhz per point. I thought that would be a little more common!

Is your CPU really running at an even 2800? I can't remember the last time I had a system where the CPU was running exactly at the rated/expected MHz due to the bus speed not being a perfect even 100.0, 200.0 MHz, or whatever.

As I said before, without members posting the actual MHz of the CPU (when under load), the sorted chart isn't accurate either.

Yep. Even 2.8GHZ to this day.

 

[SolMiester]

i5 3470 @4ghz = 595

 

[aayush1407]

i3-4130 3.4 Ghz
Score: 581

 

[Fred B]

i3-2130 - 3.49Ghz - 535 points

 

[VirtualLarry]

Foxconn AT-5570 NanoPC, C-70 CPU (1.0Ghz, 1.33Ghz turbo), 4GB DDR3, Windows 7 64-bit.

Scores: 79.9, 80.1

 

[Techhog]

Foxconn AT-5570 NanoPC, C-70 CPU (1.0Ghz, 1.33Ghz turbo), 4GB DDR3, Windows 7 64-bit.

Scores: 79.9, 80.1

Wow. o.o

 

[StrangerGuy]

Stock 1-core Turbo 4.4GHz 4790K = 752

 

[mojothehut]

Pushed my 4770k to 4.5 (up from 4.2)
759

 

[skipsneeky2]

581 for a 3770 3.7GHz.

 

[upgrade fanatic]

830 from my 4790k at 4.8

 

[Edgemeal]

i7-3770 @ Stock (Turbo: 3912 MHz), DDR3-1600-9-9-9-24-2T
Score: 614

@ skipsneeky2: Why 3.7GHz? You limit turbo to only 3.7GHz on all cores or something?

 

[Kenmitch]

Looking like 900 isn't going to happen for a while if ever. I guess a golden Haswell on ln2 maybe is the only possibility.

 

[StrangerGuy]

Looking like 900 isn't going to happen for a while if ever. I guess a golden Haswell on ln2 maybe is the only possibility.

That would be a 4790K @ (900 / 752 * 4.4GHz) = ~5.3GHz assuming perfect scaling...Probably 5.5GHz with real world scaling.

BTW a Pentium III @ 1GHz = 77.4
Haswell @ 4.4GHz = 752
Clock-for-clock advantage for Haswell over P3 = [(1 / 4.4) * 752] / 77.4 = 2.2x

 

[skipsneeky2]

@ skipsneeky2: Why 3.7GHz? You limit turbo to only 3.7GHz on all cores or something?

Yeah the max it does is 3.7GHz on all cores when loaded, it's a non k model.Most demanding thing it does is handle BF4 and it does that very well.