Post your Cpumark99 scores

Page 8 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
Makaveli

Makaveli

Diamond Member
Feb 8, 2002
4,975
1,571
136
Edgemeal said:
Thanks, fixed post #172, the i5 460M - 2530MHz was at the top.... I was like WTH? So looked it up, its really 2800MHz/turbo.

People need to post the real CPU speed / Turbo speed!
Click to expand...

Sorry that was my bad the laptop is totally all stock. I usually have turbo disabled like on my desktop.

lol when I looked at the chart I was also like wtf haha
 
M

matt3D

Member
Jun 16, 2009
89
0
0
2012-04-01_1310.png


at 4.7047GHz (100.1MHz x 47)
 
Edgemeal

Edgemeal

Senior member
Dec 8, 2007
211
57
101
SonicIce said:
lol the only P4 in the chart blows ass. we already knew this tho
Click to expand...

Ya no surprise on the P4, but I'm suspecting the A8 3870k @ 3.5GHz score is bogus, I find it hard to believe a Llano @ 3.5GHz is scoring better then Phenom/Deneb @ 3.9GHz. Anyone else?

Edit: I found one review with scores for 3870K, at stock it scored 432, @ 3.5GHz (OC 2) they scored 502.
 
Last edited:
ninaholic37

ninaholic37

Golden Member
Apr 13, 2012
1,883
31
91
Interesting thread. Here's mine:

Acer Aspire One D270 (Atom N2600) - 112
Acer Aspire One ZG5 (Atom N270) - 108

I use my netbook for everything (news, forums, video, music), usually 5 hours a day. :biggrin:

I had an Aspire One D257 (Atom N570) and 522 (AMD C-50) as well. I imagine the C-50 would get the best mark (it seemed to handle most things quite well) but I'm not sure.
 
Last edited:
Miramonti

Miramonti

Lifer
Aug 26, 2000
28,653
100
106
Edgemeal said:
Updated to post #177...
cpumark99all.png


Code: 
[B][COLOR="Red"]Sorted by Point Per MHz[/COLOR]
   Name             Score  CPU           CPU MHz  Point Per MHz  MHz Per Point[/B]
01 [URL="-"]spinejam[/URL]           635  i7 920        4015     0.1582         6.3228         
02 [URL="-"]d4a2n0k[/URL]            628  i7 920        4000     0.1570         6.3694         
03 [URL="-"]grkM3[/URL]              831  2600K         5298     0.1569         6.3755         
04 [URL="-"]Makaveli[/URL]           595  i7 920        3800     0.1566         6.3866         
05 [URL="-"]zoic[/URL]               547  i7 920        3500     0.1563         6.3985         
06 [URL="-"]AdmiralAdama[/URL]       546  A8 3870k      3500     0.1560         6.4103         
07 [URL="-"]abbcccus[/URL]           592  i7 860        3800     0.1558         6.4189         
08 [URL="-"]Bill Brasky[/URL]        497  i5 750        3200     0.1553         6.4386         
09 [URL="-"]ljtatej[/URL]            682  2600K         4400     0.1550         6.4516         
10 [URL="-"]OVerLoRDI[/URL]          788  2500K         5100     0.1545         6.4721         
11 [URL="-"]abbcccus[/URL]           556  i5 750        3600     0.1544         6.4748         
12 [URL="-"]matt3D[/URL]             726  2700K         4705     0.1543         6.4807         
13 [URL="-"]Jman13[/URL]             663  2500K         4300     0.1542         6.4857         
14 [URL="-"]dark0anima[/URL]         555  i5 750        3600     0.1542         6.4865         
15 [URL="-"]n7[/URL]                 601  i7 860        3900     0.1541         6.4892         
16 [URL="-"]chimaxi83[/URL]          801  2600K         5200     0.1540         6.4919         
17 [URL="-"]Kenmitch[/URL]           801  2700K         5200     0.1540         6.4919         
18 [URL="-"]Joseph F[/URL]           753  2500K         4889     0.1540         6.4927         
19 [URL="-"]Plimogz[/URL]            693  2500K         4500     0.1540         6.4935         
20 [URL="-"]Blades[/URL]             769  2500K         5000     0.1538         6.5020         
21 [URL="-"]jmanny[/URL]             738  2500K         4800     0.1538         6.5041         
22 [URL="-"]Nemesis 1[/URL]          692  2500K         4500     0.1538         6.5029         
23 [URL="-"]bryanW1995[/URL]         691  2500K         4500     0.1536         6.5123         
24 [URL="-"]Prey2big[/URL]           676  2600K         4400     0.1536         6.5089         
25 [URL="-"]AdamK47[/URL]            660  3960x         4300     0.1535         6.5152         
26 [URL="-"]abbcccus[/URL]           736  2500K         4800     0.1533         6.5217         
27 [URL="-"]Puppies04[/URL]          613  2500K         4000     0.1533         6.5253         
28 [URL="-"]HutchinsonJC[/URL]       708  3960x         4625     0.1531         6.5325         
29 [URL="-"]Diogenes2[/URL]          673  3930K         4400     0.1530         6.5379         
30 [URL="-"]Makaveli[/URL]           428  i5 460M       2800 *   0.1529         6.5421         
31 [URL="-"]Kenmitch[/URL]           846  2550K         5547     0.1525         6.5567         
32 [URL="-"]Hulk[/URL]               640  2500K         4200     0.1524         6.5625         
33 [URL="-"]abbcccus[/URL]           667  i3 550        4400     0.1516         6.5967         
34 [URL="-"]hyrule4927[/URL]         681  i3 530        4500     0.1513         6.6079         
35 [URL="-"]God Mode[/URL]           497  i7 2720QM     3300     0.1506         6.6398         
36 [URL="-"]Raizinman[/URL]          440  i7 920        2930     0.1502         6.6591         
37 [URL="-"]hyrule4927[/URL]         494  i7 2820QM     3300     0.1497         6.6802         
38 [URL="-"]anikhtos[/URL]           327  i3 2330m      2200 *   0.1486         6.7278         
39 [URL="-"]IntelUser2000[/URL]      560  2600K         3800 *   0.1474         6.7857         
40 [URL="-"]loafbred[/URL]           520  Q9550         3600     0.1444         6.9231         
41 [URL="-"]Gannef[/URL]             384  Q9450         2660     0.1444         6.9271         
42 [URL="-"]n7[/URL]                 577  Q9650         4000     0.1443         6.9324         
43 [URL="-"]happy medium[/URL]       519  Q9550         3600     0.1442         6.9364         
44 [URL="-"]ShadowVVL[/URL]          408  Q9550         2830     0.1442         6.9363         
45 [URL="-"]jjsole[/URL]             605  E8600         4200     0.1440         6.9421         
46 [URL="-"]adam_the_giant[/URL]     416  i7 2630QM     2900 *   0.1434         6.9712         
47 [URL="-"]abbcccus[/URL]           387  E5400         2700     0.1433         6.9767         
48 [URL="-"]Scholzpdx[/URL]          400  Q8200         2800     0.1429         7.0000         
49 [URL="-"]Chiropteran[/URL]        327  A6-3400M      2300 *   0.1422         7.0336         
50 [URL="-"]n7[/URL]                 568  E5300         4000     0.1420         7.0423         
51 [URL="-"]hdfxst[/URL]             532  X2 240        3750     0.1419         7.0489         
52 [URL="-"]AsusGuy[/URL]            510  E6750         3600     0.1417         7.0588         
53 [URL="-"]Cogman[/URL]             340  Q6600         2400     0.1417         7.0588         
54 [URL="-"]Apocalypse23[/URL]       566  E8400         4000     0.1415         7.0671         
55 [URL="-"]Magic Carpet[/URL]       378  Regor         2700     0.1400         7.1429         
56 [URL="-"]Chiropteran[/URL]        461  X2 265        3300     0.1397         7.1584         
57 [URL="-"]Joepublic2[/URL]         390  E6300         2800     0.1393         7.1795         
58 [URL="-"]konakona[/URL]           527  X4 965        3800     0.1387         7.2106         
59 [URL="-"]Leyawiin[/URL]           498  X4 955        3600     0.1383         7.2289         
60 [URL="-"]MegaWorks[/URL]          607  X4 960T       4400     0.1380         7.2488         
61 [URL="-"]Jovec[/URL]              530  X4 955        3840     0.1380         7.2453         
62 [URL="-"]allenk09[/URL]           536  X4 965        3900     0.1374         7.2761         
63 [URL="-"]Edgemeal[/URL]           482  X2 550        3510     0.1373         7.2822         
64 [URL="-"]sb.0326[/URL]            562  X6 1090T      4100     0.1371         7.2954         
65 [URL="-"]BD231[/URL]              534  X3 720        3902     0.1369         7.3071         
66 [URL="-"]VirtualLarry[/URL]       480  X6 1045T      3510     0.1368         7.3125         
67 [URL="-"]TakeNoPrisoners[/URL]    529  X4 955        3900     0.1356         7.3724         
68 [URL="-"]JimmiG[/URL]             488  X4 955        3700     0.1319         7.5820         
69 [URL="-"]Gannef[/URL]             288  T4400         2200     0.1309         7.6389         
70 [URL="-"]DominionSeraph[/URL]     338  X2 5200+      2600 *   0.1300         7.6923         
71 [URL="-"]nemesismk2[/URL]         418  X3 455        3300     0.1267         7.8947         
72 [URL="-"]gibbs007[/URL]           388  X2 6000+      3100 *   0.1252         7.9897         
73 [URL="-"]nyker96[/URL]            324  X4 620        2600 *   0.1246         8.0247         
74 [URL="-"]gibbs007[/URL]           362  Q9400         3000     0.1207         8.2873         
75 [URL="-"]Edgemeal[/URL]           305  X2 4200+      2596     0.1175         8.5115         
76 [URL="-"]SonicIce[/URL]           292  A64 3200+     2500     0.1168         8.5616         
77 [URL="-"]astroidea[/URL]          182  Pentium-M     1600     0.1138         8.7912         
78 [URL="-"]Edgemeal[/URL]           249  A64 3200+     2200 *   0.1132         8.8353         
79 [URL="-"]Dravic[/URL]             507  FX-8150       4560     0.1112         8.9941         
80 [URL="-"]Chiropteran[/URL]        440  FX-8120       4000 *   0.1100         9.0909         
81 [URL="-"]Chiropteran[/URL]        128  E-450         1650 *   0.0776         12.8906        
82 [URL="-"]SonicIce[/URL]          25.2  Celeron 333A  0333 *   0.0757         13.2143        
83 [URL="-"]Chiropteran[/URL]        164  P4 551        3400 *   0.0482         20.7317
Click to expand...

You rock. :thumbsup:
 
K

Kenmitch

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 1999
8,505
2,250
136
ShintaiDK said:
i5 3570K stock speed. 579. :p

And alot fo stuff in the background.
Click to expand...

A more controlled test would be best and more informative to those who wonder how IB compares to the other generation of chips. Stock speed varies by cores loaded so it's a kinda unkown speed at times.
 
Edgemeal

Edgemeal

Senior member
Dec 8, 2007
211
57
101
Kenmitch said:
A more controlled test would be best and more informative to those who wonder how IB compares to the other generation of chips. Stock speed varies by cores loaded so it's a kinda unkown speed at times.
Click to expand...

Its also a single threaded benchmark, would be best to set the CPU Affinity of the bench to just one core and post your CPUs actually speed for that core (if possible).

When people post stock speed I just use the stock turbo speed Intel shows, so for example with ShintaiDK's post above I was expecting Ivy to do a hair better,
i5 3570K @ 3.8GHz (turbo), Score = 579 = 0.1524 Point Per MHz.
 
K

Kenmitch

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 1999
8,505
2,250
136
Edgemeal said:
Its also a single threaded benchmark, would be best to set the CPU Affinity of the bench to just one core and post your CPUs actually speed for that core (if possible).

When people post stock speed I just use the stock turbo speed Intel shows, so for example with ShintaiDK's post above I was expecting Ivy to do a hair better,
i5 3570K @ 3.8GHz (turbo), Score = 579 = 0.1524 Point Per MHz.
Click to expand...

It's damn near impossible to hit the single core turbo speed and maintain it is the reason why I brought it up.

To get a better idea we'll need results from overclocked IB's for the most part. The actual overclocks don't really matter it's just the data from the fixed multiplier that is needed. I figure just a couple of results is all that is needed to get an idea of the advancement in technology :)
 
ShintaiDK

ShintaiDK

Lifer
Apr 22, 2012
20,378
146
106
Let me run it again. And I will look at CPU-Z to see what it Turbos at.

It swings between 3.6, 3.7 and 3.8. I would say the average was around 3.65. 3.8 was rareish.

But as said, you need a fixed speed to get precise data.
 
Last edited:
Edgemeal

Edgemeal

Senior member
Dec 8, 2007
211
57
101
Kenmitch said:
It's damn near impossible to hit the single core turbo speed and maintain it is the reason why I brought it up.
Click to expand...

Right, so all those stock CPU "Point Per Mhz" results are most likely way off for CPUs that have turbo since we don't really know what the actual clock speed was when the bench was running.

To get a better idea we'll need results from overclocked IB's for the most part. The actual overclocks don't really matter it's just the data from the fixed multiplier that is needed. I figure just a couple of results is all that is needed to get an idea of the advancement in technology :)
Click to expand...

Thats what I was curious about.
 
D

dawza

Senior member
Dec 31, 2005
921
0
76
C2D L9400 @1.87

All cores
Run 1 = 283
Run 2 = 281

Affinity = Core 0 only
Run 1 = 287
Run 2 = 289

i5 M560 @2.67

All cores
Run 1 = 472
Run 2 = 470
Run 3 = 470
Run 4 = 468

Affinity = Core 0 only
Run 1 = 482
Run 2 = 483

Affinity = Core 1 only
Run 1 = 477
Run 2 = 477

Affinity = Core 3 only
Run 1 = 476

Affinity = Core 2 only
Run 1 = 482

Affinity = Cores 0 and 2
Run 1 = 470

Affinity = Cores 0 and 1
Run 1 = 481

Affinity = Cores 1 and 3
Run 1 = 477
Run 2 = 476

Affinity = Cores 2 and 3
Run 1 = 483

Affinity = Cores 1 and 2
Run 1 = 483

Affinity = Cores 0, 1, and 3
Run 1 = 480
Run 2 = 481

Affinity = Cores 0, 1, and 2
Run 1 = 471

All at stock config, plugged in. C2D is running W7 x64 Pro, and i5 M is running W7 Ent x32.

For both systems, there seems to be a ~2.2% advantage when running in single logical core config compared to all cores or >1 logical core. This is assuming that my recollection of cores 0 and 2 being logical and 1 and 3 HT for enabled systems is accurate.

The results with the mobile i5, however, suggest that one logical core + 1 HT core is equivalent to single-core-- furthermore, it seems that mixing and matching does not matter, as long as the criteria of one logical + 1 HT core is maintained.

Oddly, putting two HT cores (1 and 3) together results in a middle-of-the road effect. I thought maybe the first score of 477 could be variance, but the second run I did after writing this up indicates it may be real. Even stranger is 1 logical + 2 HT, which may be another tier of difference, or could just be noise-- I don't have enough n to lend statistical significance to such a tiny delta within the four different conditions. Maybe someone with higher clocks with an HT-capable CPU can provide definitive findings. I'm also too lazy to actually repeat this test while tracking CPU clock.

My guess is that turbo kicks in as follows:

1 logical OR 1 logical + 1 HT >= 1 logical + 2 HT >= 2 HT > 2 logical OR 2 logical + 1 OR 2 HT

It's probably safe to say that 1 logical or 1 logical/1HT > 2 HT OR 2 logical. What I don't know is whether 1 logical or 1 logical/1 HT > 1 logical/2HT. Likewise, I can't say for sure that the latter is > 2HT. Need many, many more data points (or just more data points if someone can provide higher clocks to get *presumably* larger deltas between conditions) to run ANOVA w/post-hoc testing for this many comparisons.

Edit: Realized I forgot about single HT core only. Ran another round with Core 1 only, and also threw in some other tests. Repeated two more rounds with all cores as a control.

Clearly, I need more analytical work at work.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom