Post Your CineBench R11.5 Score

[BallaTheFeared]

My old 965 on DDR2 got 4.72 at 4.1 so I don't think anything is wrong with his score.

 

[Durvelle27]

**List Updated**

 

[BallaTheFeared]

**List Updated**

My apologies

 

[CHADBOGA]

**List Updated**

My little Haswell Dualie didn't make it. :'(

 

[crashtech]

Yeah, I was working on an unofficial list update just before Durvelle posted today, but mine had like 50 entries.

 

[mohit9206]

OK here is mine. Do the number of cores affect the score or is this test solely based on the overall performance of the CPU.Am sure the scores must not be indicative of real life gaming performance because my cpu while gets less than half the score of the phenom 965 is pretty comparable in games that do not take advantage of 2 extra cores of the phenom.

 

[aigomorla]

the score is indicative of multi threaded performance in terms of rendering on windows platform.

So yes cores do matter a lot... which is why none of us can touch minerva's score on her beastly 16c/32t machine

 

[Erenhardt]

OK here is mine. Do the number of cores affect the score or is this test solely based on the overall performance of the CPU.Am sure the scores must not be indicative of real life gaming performance because my cpu while gets less than half the score of the phenom 965 is pretty comparable in games that do not take advantage of 2 extra cores of the phenom.

Your score per core is a bit better than stock (3.4GHz) phenom 965. Note that 4,0 GHz is 17% overclock

 

[BallaTheFeared]

Bootstrap finally works with new bios v1.4... Not bad for $30 shell shocker ram 2500MHz

Edit: Shout out to MSI

 

[Manoa]

my 4300 mhz E8400 dual-core wolfdale single threaded score: 1.29, multi: 2.55

AMD users be warned: the Cinebench benchmark program is built using Intel's compiler and Intel development tools - which (if my information is not entirely outdated) deliberately cripples the performance of the application on AMD processors - because Intel's development tools use a runtime CPU check to test which optimized routines to use based on the processor's vendor name, stored in the MSR's of the CPU, that value on Intel processors is "GenuineIntel" and the value on AMD processors is "AuthenticAMD", that being said you should be able to substitute the GenuineIntel with AuthenticAMD in the application and it's libraries using a tool named AuthenticAMD-patch using the -a parameter, problem is that the tool is a Linux application, hopefully someone here will be willing to patch the program and upload the modified version

 

[AdamK47]

 

[justin4pack]

new build = new result

 

[crashtech]

See if you can get 4.9GHz+ and beat my score! Nice to see another SB i7 in the mix.

 

[Durvelle27]

Got a new CPU


Tweaking settings but my 8350 @5.092GHz @1.50v

 

[TheThirdMan]

Office workstation with spec in sig: 14.45

 

[Durvelle27]

 

[crashtech]

What's an 8350 running at 2GHz for?

 

[Durvelle27]

What's an 8350 running at 2GHz for?

Was a experiment I was doing to try to see what it performs like when clocked like a Jaguar Chip

 

[crashtech]

Oh, OK. Thanks!

 

[(sic)Klown12]

Here's my 4930K that boost to 4.4Ghz. As you can see, I ran it twice and turbo boost seems to have quite a bit of variability for benchmarks.

 

[Durvelle27]

Oh, OK. Thanks!

No problem

 

[SPBHM]

A little bit exotic...

that's quite exotic indeed, considering it's only 1.2GHz I guess is not to bad, also if the IGP is based on Chrome 4xx/5xx it should be OK (much better than the older VIA IGPs at least), to bad VIA simply can't compete with products like this with Intel and AMD, they just can't sell them cheaply enough I guess.

Was a experiment I was doing to try to see what it performs like when clocked like a Jaguar Chip

I think that's the exact same score as an i3 3220 (3.3GHz dual core IB with HT)
Jaguar with 8 cores at 2GHz would probably be faster, if you look here
http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=2343102

2GHz Jaguar scores 0.50 ST compared to your 0.52, but Jaguar have no CMT penalty, so a 2GHz 8 core jaguar would score around 3.7 points probably

 

[popobearr]

Updated CineBench to R15

Mehh

 

[TerryMathews]

Sure, I'll play.



Uploaded with ImageShack.us

 

[monstercameron]

[un]fortunately no 32bit support...

 

[(sic)Klown12]

Since I love new benchmarks, here's mine.