Post your 3D-Mark 2003 Scores!!!

[Vortex22]

How are some of you guys changing the resolution? All the settings seem to be locked...

 

[Tates]

uncheck the "Custom Settings"

 

[ski]

3DMark03 score= 5158 with ATI 9700Pro @351/337 Athlon XP 2800+ @ 2405mhz Asus A7N8X Set on Performance

 

[Vortex22]

Hmm I must be stupid or something... I don't see a custom setting checkbox.

The "select" and "change" buttons under the tests and settings columns are greyed out, so are the image quality and texture filtering buttons.

 

[Vortex22]

Bleh, apparently you have to pay to be able to change any settings whatsoever :|

 

[StumbleBum1]

Exactly 5,000:Q
My 3D-Mark 2003

 

[AtomicDude512]

Vortex22: You are not alone, I guess only the CD version lets you customize your test settings. That means we cant go down to below 640x480 to get good scores.

 

[AtomicDude512]

Update: After optimizations (Athlon 1700 @ 145FSB, as far as I could go) I managed to reach 992 points.

 

[lobadobadingdong]

AthlonXP Palimino 1700+ @12.5mult&141 fsb(the only thing oc'd on my system) runs at 2000+ speeds
1 GB pc2700 cl2.5
Radeon 9700Pro (AGP 8x) 3.1 Catalyst drivers 1024x768 res
MSI KT4vl(KT400 chipset)
80GB WD SE

4416 marks (forgot to turn Norton and my ups software off though, I'll run it again and edit this later when I do it with nothing running in the background)
4418 with norton off(woopy do), I appearently can't turn of the apc power chute software without uninstalling it altogether.
Compared with the same settings on 3dmark2001 got 12326.

 

[Glitchny]

4397

radeon 9700 stock, athlon xp 2100+

 

[lobadobadingdong]

Originally posted by: Deeko
Does anyone else find it annoying that it takes longer to load the tests than to run them?

what are you talking about? every test loaded in less than 2 sec, most where less than 1 sec. on my sys. Maybe you got a disk I/O problem.

 

[cmdrdredd]

if anyone looks it says "Max Ansiotrpopy 4" maybe that means it's enabling 4X Ansio automaticaly! This could be for the less than great scores we are seeing. My 9700Pro with P4 2.63Ghz DDR413 Cas2 is only scoring a 4761. In 3dmark 2k1SE I get 15,755 and UT2003 gives me a solid 60FPS at 8x ansio and 2X AA 1024x768. So this benchmak to me is pretty useless. If the latest game runs fine and fast with the settings up there I don't think a benchmark matters. Becides...no game out in the near future will be using DX9 even a bit.

 

[wetcat007]

I got 1577 on AMD Athlon XP 1700+ @150FSB=2000+ and GeForce 4 ti4200 @ ti4400 speeds and is 128MB 512 DDR2100.

This is the most biast benchmakr by them yet!!!

 

[Tetsuo]

Originally posted by: frombauer
Welcome do SlideshowMark03!!

LOL, so true

i got 1127

3.1 Catalyst drivers
radeon 900pro 128mb
athlon xp 2000+
512mb 2700 ddr

 

[CoolLight]

5176

Athlon XP 2100+@2.3G
A7N8X Deluxe @192FSB Sync
Radeon 9700 Pro OCed to 365/330 with Crystal Orb on performance

First run, not as bad as I thought.

 

[Metalloid]

4234 with Radeon 9700 Pro. That second game, Battle of whatever, ate my system alive. It's nice to get 5 fps every once in a while.

 

[moosey]

Celeron Tualatin 1ghz at 1.45
Gainward GF4 Ti4200 (260/510)
512MB SDRAM
Asus TUSL2-C
Score:1300

 

[Vortex22]

1140

 

[silver24]

Originally posted by: Technonut
Radeon 9700 Pro: (Not OC'ed) 4899.

EDIT: P4 2.53@ 3125 MHz / ABIT IT7

00000000000000 0000 0000 00000000000000 00000 00000
00000000000000 0000 0000 00000000000000 00000 00000
0000 0000 0000 0000 000000 00000 00000
0000 0000 0000 0000 000000 000000000000000
00000000000 0000 0000 00000000000000 000000000000000
0000 0000 0000 0000 00000000000000 000000000000000
0000 0000 0000 0000 000000 00000 00000
0000 0000 0000 0000 000000 00000 00000
0000 0000 0000 0000 00000000000000 00000 00000
0000 0000 000000000000 00000000000000 00000 00000

 

[vexingv]

really weird ....i got a score of 578 w. AXP 1838 mghz and R9500Pro ...wuts up w/ that?

btw does this have to do w/ ur desktop settings too..i.e. AA and AF settings (which i have at 4x and 16x respecitively)

 

Originally posted by: vexingv
really weird ....i got a score of 578 w. AXP 1838 mghz and R9500Pro ...wuts up w/ that?

btw does this have to do w/ ur desktop settings too..i.e. AA and AF settings (which i have at 4x and 16x respecitively)

Of course it does.

 

[SLCentral]

I got 4277 right after installing my new 9700 Pro. My specs are:

Alienware Aurora DDR
Asus K7N266-C
Athlon XP 2200+
512MB DDR 2100
ATI Radeon 9700 Pro
SoundBlaster Live 5.1
40GB Seagate 7200rpm HD

Is that score any good? Hopefully after I format it'll go up.

 

[vexingv]

Originally posted by: dwell

Originally posted by: vexingv
really weird ....i got a score of 578 w. AXP 1838 mghz and R9500Pro ...wuts up w/ that?

btw does this have to do w/ ur desktop settings too..i.e. AA and AF settings (which i have at 4x and 16x respecitively)

Of course it does.

well i just changed the AA and AF settings to application pref. and the main settings all the way to the left...now i have a score of 465...this makes absolutely no sense at all

 

Originally posted by: vexingv

Originally posted by: dwell

Originally posted by: vexingv
really weird ....i got a score of 578 w. AXP 1838 mghz and R9500Pro ...wuts up w/ that?

btw does this have to do w/ ur desktop settings too..i.e. AA and AF settings (which i have at 4x and 16x respecitively)

Of course it does.

well i just changed the AA and AF settings to application pref. and the main settings all the way to the left...now i have a score of 465...this makes absolutely no sense at all

You sure it's really 465? I had large fonts installed and it looked like mine was 585 when it was really 1585 because the "1" got cut off.

 

[vexingv]

i'll check the fonts again....but i had 10-20fps for proxycon and 15-25 fps for troll

UPDATE: tried changin the fonts thru windows but still couldnt get it small enough...it looks like there might be some clipping in the numbers