Post your 3D-Mark 2003 Scores!!!

[AtomicDude512]

Just wanted to get a thread started. Ill post my scores as soon as I can get the software!

-Atomic

 

[slag]

umm, its NOT OUT yet, so there is no reason for this thread.

Please lock.

 

[Richdog]

Don't see any harm in the thread being there... don't post if you don't want, where's the problem?

 

[slag]

hell might as well go post a thread about windows 4500 coming out..

The whole point of this thread is loony.

 

[AtomicDude512]

Slag, the next Windows version due to be released is Windows AMD64 for the Athlon 64.

I was looking, a DX8.1 certified card can only run 3 tests. I feel defeated already.

 

[merlocka]

Originally posted by: slag
hell might as well go post a thread about windows 4500 coming out..

The whole point of this thread is loony.

Dude, it will be available today (supposedly 5 minutes ago). Not that I'm a big 3dFark fan, but your panties are waaay in a bunch.

 

[Deeko]

Oh boy, new sh!t to replace the old sh!t

 

[Killrose]

Time to throw away all those DX5-DX7 video cards and get some DX8-DX9 ones.

 

[MarkFahey]

Just ran it and got 18,290 on my P3 550Mhz 64M RAM TNT Box! I am one happy camper...

ROFL - Just kidding

 

[MercenaryForHire]

Originally posted by: AtomicDude512
Slag, the next Windows version due to be released is Windows AMD64 for the Athlon 64.

I was looking, a DX8.1 certified card can only run 3 tests. I feel defeated already.

(In line at FileShack - wait time 2 hours)

WTF? Only 3 tests?

That's geigh.

- M4H

 

[vss1980]

Well, that is a direct copy of 3DMark2001 where a DX7 card could only run 3 out of the 4 tests, the 4th needing DX8. This time round its just that DX9 is needed for all 4, and DX8 for 3.

So, its only as annoying as its predecessor....

 

[Killrose]

This is the sort of download I set up before I go to bed and wake up sometime in the morning to retreive it, and I have cable.

 

[AtomicDude512]

True vss1980, I dont feel so bad now. Except that futuremark's servers seem to be flooded. Might wait till tommorow...

 

[MercenaryForHire]

Originally posted by: vss1980
Well, that is a direct copy of 3DMark2001 where a DX7 card could only run 3 out of the 4 tests, the 4th needing DX8. This time round its just that DX9 is needed for all 4, and DX8 for 3.

So, its only as annoying as its predecessor....

Yeah, but DX7 cards ran the remaining "unneccessary" tests that all the hardcore "OMG MY SKORE IS BETTAR THAN j00ZZ!!!1" wankers didn't bother to.

As long as I can run at least 75% of the tests in *total* I'm happy.

- M4H

 

[mamisano]

I am downloading right now...6% complete, too bad I am at work and my IBM Thinkpad T23 only has an S3 integrated chipset .

Looks like I will have to wait until I get home :frown:

 

[BatmanNate]

Is DX9 even out yet? My Radeon 9700 Pro is coming tommorrow, and is supposed to be fully DX9 compliant.

 

[WaTaGuMp]

Originally posted by: BatmanNate
Is DX9 even out yet? My Radeon 9700 Pro is coming tommorrow, and is supposed to be fully DX9 compliant.

Dx9 been out for a while.


I got it downloading right now. Here are some mirrors below.




Mirrors

 

[hollowman]

Tested mine.

Man, my system has been slaughtered.

I have Epox 8kha+ w/ XP1800@ 1.78ghz (~XP2100) with Radeon 9700 at (330/300)

Result: 4573

Some tests were like 1-2 FPS..

 

[BatmanNate]

Originally posted by: WaTaGuMp

Originally posted by: BatmanNate
Is DX9 even out yet? My Radeon 9700 Pro is coming tommorrow, and is supposed to be fully DX9 compliant.

Dx9 been out for a while.


I got it downloading right now. Here are some mirrors below.




Mirrors

Thanks!

 

[AtomicDude512]

Owww. If you guys were getting those scores I wonder how well my XP 1700 and GF4 Ti 4200 will fare... Besides, I still cant get on to the Futuremark servers. Anybody got a link so I can download the file directly?

 

[Spicedaddy]

4619


P4 @ 2240MHz, 9700 Pro @ default speeds.

 

[althes]

4811.
raedon 9700pro at stock speed
p42.4b@3Ghz

 

[merlocka]

<wondering>

How many people are going to buy 9500/9700 cards just because of a new benchmark?

</wondering>

 

[hollowman]

Originally posted by: merlocka
<wondering>

How many people are going to buy 9500/9700 cards just because of a new benchmark?

</wondering>

probably not much. if they have managed to live without those cards until now, i am sure they can live without the new benchmark.

 

[merlocka]

Originally posted by: hollowman

Originally posted by: merlocka
<wondering>

How many people are going to buy 9500/9700 cards just because of a new benchmark?

</wondering>

probably not much. if they have managed to live without those cards until now, i am sure they can live without the new benchmark.

Ya, one would hope... but for some reason methinks there will be many who do.

Here's what us "minimum recommended system" folks will score...

Asus A7V - Tbird 1GHz @ 104x12.5
512MB PC133c2, WinXP, DX9, nV40.72
Geforce3

Default

3dMark Score ... 895
GT1 - Wings of Fury ... 56.6 fps
GT2 - Battly of Proxycon ... 5.8 fps
GT3 - Troll's Lair ... 5.7 fps
GT4 - Mother Nature ... Not Supported

Video Card overclocked to 225/550

3dMark Score ... 1015
GT1 - Wings of Fury ... 65.0 fps
GT2 - Battly of Proxycon ... 6.6 fps
GT3 - Troll's Lair ... 6.3 fps
GT4 - Mother Nature ... Not Supported