POST YOUR 3D MARK 2001 SCORES PLZ !!!

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
T

Technonut

Diamond Member
Mar 19, 2000
4,041
0
0
Damn nice Technonut CPU you got there....
Click to expand...
Thanks.... :) I just bumped up the FSB one more notch....Scored 10,000 Even!! If I counted correctly, that puts my score as 16th in comparable AMD XP processor speed and Radeon 8500. ;)

I will loop the benchmark overnight for stability, then run UT in spectator mode with 16 bots and a 999 frag limit. I was running at 1900 MHz / 190 FSB before, but kicked down the RAM timings some and upped the FSB. No artifacts or tearing. My Sandra memory bench is now @ 2856/2638.

EDIT: The Radeon is not overclocked.
 
V

Vidclone

Banned
Jul 31, 2002
53
0
0
V

Vidclone

Banned
Jul 31, 2002
53
0
0
Oh and My 3Dmark2001 title is

X-Micro Geforce4Ti4200 @ 315/625 With Detonator 40.41

And for some reason my Epox 8k3a board at 133 FSB clocks my Athlon 1800+ at ( 1.537Mhz )
but im sure the extra 4Mhz does nothing !
 
L

legendma

Senior member
Jan 27, 2000
975
0
76
P4 1.8a@2.88Ghz (160 FSB)
GF4 Ti4600@310/725
Using Detonator 29.80

Score 13050 on 3DMark2001SE.. But have one big problem.. Does anyone know why I only score 55fps on the Nature Test?? I should scoring in the 80fps or so looking at other results.. Does anyone know what's going on here?? Thanks..
 
T

theflyingdutchman

Member
Jul 19, 2001
100
0
0
Hi,

config. (no tweaking)

XP 2000+
ASUS A7V333
2 x 256 apacer 2700
ASUS 8460 Ti 4600 128 mb

10.538 points on default settings

Alpha pal 8045T with a 1.3 W Papst-fan at 2600rpm. CPU running idle at 43 Celcius and 47C~ after playing UT2003 for an hour..... cool hu! :cool:

Regards TFD
 
T

theflyingdutchman

Member
Jul 19, 2001
100
0
0
Yo, speedy,

I've got these Asus drivers installed (latest version) do you think installing the new Nvidia drivers could make a difference.

Regards TFD
 
S

SpeedyGonzales

Member
Aug 15, 2002
184
0
76
The new 40.xx Nvidia reference drivers mainly boost the performance in the "Nature" test, at least this is the most visible effect. Overall my 3Dmark2001SE score went up by about 700 points with the new drivers, but I believe this is mainly coming from the optimizations they did to the shaders operations, there is nearly no effect on the "car", "dragothic" or "lobby" tests.

I am running them stable since a couple of days, so you should have no big issues using them.
Cheers
Speedy
 
T

theflyingdutchman

Member
Jul 19, 2001
100
0
0
Yo Speedy,

Got a free performance-gaine this afternoon, clearly the gain is in the nature test. I saw a framerates up to 106 allmost dubbeling the performance in this test. The lowest framerate was around 70 (the part where you go flying towards the house)

got 11.168 marks on the same default settings.

Thanks nvidia.... and thanks Speedy for the tip..

Regards TFD
 
S

SupermanCK

Platinum Member
Mar 31, 2000
2,264
0
0
Originally posted by: legendma
P4 1.8a@2.88Ghz (160 FSB)
GF4 Ti4600@310/725
Using Detonator 29.80

Score 13050 on 3DMark2001SE.. But have one big problem.. Does anyone know why I only score 55fps on the Nature Test?? I should scoring in the 80fps or so looking at other results.. Does anyone know what's going on here?? Thanks..
Click to expand...

get den40.41...you can also try setting yoru D3D quality setting to BEST PERFORMANCE...you should gain about 10fsp - 15fps...but den40.41 gives you almost 30fps to 50fps...
 
D

Dug

Diamond Member
Jun 6, 2000
3,469
6
81
13338

Raising my cpu up from 2.5 to 2.8 ghz increased my 3dmark almost 900 points

I wish i knew how those guys with similar systems to mine are breaking 15K
 
P

PhoenixOfWater

Golden Member
Jul 8, 2002
1,583
0
0
Link :)

Asus P3C-E
P3 Tualatin 1.2GB (not 1.266) 512K "Locked ES" with a Powerleap Ver. 2.0 Run at 1.35GB (9*150)
256MB of Samsung PC800 Rambus - 40n
ATI Radeon 8500 128MB At 306/306
40GB West D. HDD 7200
32X CD-Rom
Win XP Pro
 
Imported

Imported

Lifer
Sep 2, 2000
14,679
23
81
Originally posted by: Dug
13338

Raising my cpu up from 2.5 to 2.8 ghz increased my 3dmark almost 900 points

I wish i knew how those guys with similar systems to mine are breaking 15K
Click to expand...

Are you overclocking your video card?
 
L

Leo V

Diamond Member
Dec 4, 1999
3,123
0
0
UPDATED: 640x480x16 scores below

P4/2.26B @2.6ghz (default 1.50Vcore; survived MemTest86!)
Asus P4B533
Corsair XMS3200C2 @ 408ddr cas2-3-2-7
Ti4200 64mb (stock speed, 250/513)

1024x768x32: (@144Hz which slows it down a bit):

3DMark Score 11733
Game 1 - Car Chase - Low Detail 177.0 fps
Game 1 - Car Chase - High Detail 65.7 fps
Game 2 - Dragothic - Low Detail 194.5 fps
Game 2 - Dragothic - High Detail 108.8 fps
Game 3 - Lobby - Low Detail 169.7 fps
Game 3 - Lobby - High Detail 80.0 fps
Game 4 - Nature 61.6 fps
Fill Rate (Single-Texturing) 868.6 MTexels/s
Fill Rate (Multi-Texturing) 1926.9 MTexels/s
High Polygon Count (1 Light) 50.5 MTriangles/s
High Polygon Count (8 Lights) 10.4 MTriangles/s
Environment Bump Mapping 121.2 fps
DOT3 Bump Mapping 121.8 fps
Vertex Shader 82.1 fps
Pixel Shader 102.7 fps
Advanced Pixel Shader 78.9 fps
Point Sprites 26.7 MSprites/s

[UPDATE:]

640x680x16: (some things weren't meant to be seen in 16-bit!!!)

3DMark Score 15205
Game 1 - Car Chase - Low Detail 200.4 fps
Game 1 - Car Chase - High Detail 63.4 fps
Game 2 - Dragothic - Low Detail 286.1 fps
Game 2 - Dragothic - High Detail 144.6 fps
Game 3 - Lobby - Low Detail 191.5 fps
Game 3 - Lobby - High Detail 82.6 fps
Game 4 - Nature 130.7 fps whooo! :D
Fill Rate (Single-Texturing) 983.6 MTexels/s
Fill Rate (Multi-Texturing) 1967.1 MTexels/s
High Polygon Count (1 Light) 54.2 MTriangles/s
High Polygon Count (8 Lights) 10.6 MTriangles/s
Environment Bump Mapping 169.9 fps
DOT3 Bump Mapping 326.7 fps
Vertex Shader 90.5 fps
Pixel Shader 202.0 fps
Advanced Pixel Shader 137.3 fps
Point Sprites 47.5 MSprites/s
 
D

Dug

Diamond Member
Jun 6, 2000
3,469
6
81
Originally posted by: Imported
Originally posted by: Dug
13338

Raising my cpu up from 2.5 to 2.8 ghz increased my 3dmark almost 900 points

I wish i knew how those guys with similar systems to mine are breaking 15K
Click to expand...

Are you overclocking your video card?
Click to expand...

Yep. It's a 4400 o/c to 307/658. Anything above that and I get artifacts.
I really need to get new ram though, so I can run at 375ddr instead of 280. That should help considerably



 
L

Leo V

Diamond Member
Dec 4, 1999
3,123
0
0
Just overclocked my Ti4200 to 4400 speeds: 275core, 550mem

1024x768x32 (144hz): 12305
640x480x16: 15353

"Game 4 - Nature 136.0 fps" :) it must have lots of overdraw to speed up @ 640x480 so much
 
L

LastRide

Senior member
Jul 13, 2002
946
0
76
Operating System Microsoft Windows XP
DirectX Version 8.1

Mobo Manufacturer ASUSTeK Computer INC.
Mobo Model P4B533
AGP Rates (Current/Available) 4x / 1x 2x 4x

CPU Intel Pentium 4 2400 MHz
FSB 150 MHz
Memory 512 MB

Graphics Chipset NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4200 310/530
Driver Name NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4200
Driver Version 6.13.10.4041
Video Memory 128 MB

Program Version 3DMark2001 SE
Resolution 1024x768 32bit
Texture Format Compressed
FSAA Disabled
Z-Buffer Depth 24bit
Frame Buffer Double
Rendering Pipeline D3D Pure Hardware T&L





3DMark Score 12684 3D marks

Game 1 Car Chase - Low Detail 199.2 FPS
Game 1 Car Chase - High Detail 61.3 FPS
Game 2 Dragothic - Low Detail 218.6 FPS
Game 2 Dragothic - High Detail 123.6 FPS
Game 3 Lobby - Low Detail 173.0 FPS
Game 3 Lobby - High Detail 79.2 FPS
Game 4 Nature 74.8 FPS

Fill Rate (Single-Texturing) 984.9 MTexels/s
Fill Rate (Multi-Texturing) 2321.8 MTexels/s

High Polygon Count (1 light) 58.0 MTriangels/s
High Polygon Count (8 lights) 13.0 MTriangels/s

Environment Bump Mapping 135.5 FPS
DOT3 Bump Mapping 159.3 FPS

Vertex Shader 102.1 FPS
Pixel Shader 128.5 FPS
Advanced Pixel Shader 91.0 FPS

Point Sprite 27.3 MSprites/s

 
L

LastRide

Senior member
Jul 13, 2002
946
0
76
Operating System Microsoft Windows XP
DirectX Version 8.1

Mobo Manufacturer ASUSTeK Computer INC.
Mobo Model P4B533
AGP Rates (Current/Available) 4x / 1x 2x 4x

CPU Intel Pentium 4 2400 MHz
FSB 150 MHz
Memory 512 MB

Graphics Chipset NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4200 310/530
Driver Name NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4200
Driver Version 6.13.10.4041
Video Memory 128 MB

Program Version 3DMark2001 SE
Resolution 800x600 16bit
Texture Format Compressed
FSAA Disabled
Z-Buffer Depth 24bit
Frame Buffer Double
Rendering Pipeline D3D Pure Hardware T&L





3DMark Score 14678 3D marks

Game 1 Car Chase - Low Detail 210.1 FPS
Game 1 Car Chase - High Detail 63.2 FPS
Game 2 Dragothic - Low Detail 269.3 FPS
Game 2 Dragothic - High Detail 142.1 FPS
Game 3 Lobby - Low Detail 180.9 FPS
Game 3 Lobby - High Detail 80.0 FPS
Game 4 Nature 118.5 FPS

Fill Rate (Single-Texturing) 1188.9 MTexels/s
Fill Rate (Multi-Texturing) 2420.7 MTexels/s

High Polygon Count (1 light) 61.2 MTriangels/s
High Polygon Count (8 lights) 13.2 MTriangels/s

Environment Bump Mapping 164.1 FPS
DOT3 Bump Mapping 282.7 FPS

Vertex Shader 109.9 FPS
Pixel Shader 189.6 FPS
Advanced Pixel Shader 126.5 FPS

Point Sprite 37.3 MSprites/s

 
T

Technonut

Diamond Member
Mar 19, 2000
4,041
0
0
Updated score with a retail Radeon 9700: (Copied from my thread in the video forum)

I managed to obtain another Retail 9700 from one of my business suppliers, and it is doing well. It does not take well to the high FSB I am used to running with the 8500....But the card rocks! ;)

With the 9700 not overclocked, it is pulling a 3DMark2001 SE score of 13972 . UT looks and runs beautiful with the goodies turned on @ 1280x1024x32. I will be testing other current games when I have the time..

EDIT: Updated score.
 
L

Leo V

Diamond Member
Dec 4, 1999
3,123
0
0
Finally! My "Gainward Golden Sample" GeForce4 ti4200 w/ 128mb Samsung 4ns chips is here!
Maxed out @ 315/560mhz and I get zero artifacts in the Artifact Tester! Stable as a rock :D

Here are the scores (P4/2.26B @2.6ghz, 612fsb, 408ddr cas2; videocard at 315/560 core/mem):

1024x768x32 results:
3DMark Score 13071 (up from 11264 at default video speeds: 250/444 core/mem)
Game 1 - Car Chase - Low Detail 197.2 fps
Game 1 - Car Chase - High Detail 66.1 fps
Game 2 - Dragothic - Low Detail 226.7 fps
Game 2 - Dragothic - High Detail 127.1 fps
Game 3 - Lobby - Low Detail 183.5 fps
Game 3 - Lobby - High Detail 83.9 fps
Game 4 - Nature 72.9 fps
Fill Rate (Single-Texturing) 1034.2 MTexels/s
Fill Rate (Multi-Texturing) 2349.5 MTexels/s
High Polygon Count (1 Light) 60.0 MTriangles/s
High Polygon Count (8 Lights) 13.1 MTriangles/s
Environment Bump Mapping 135.9 fps
DOT3 Bump Mapping 146.0 fps
Vertex Shader 102.1 fps
Pixel Shader 125.8 fps
Advanced Pixel Shader 94.0 fps
Point Sprites 29.1 MSprites/s

640x480x16 results:
3DMark Score 15971
Game 1 - Car Chase - Low Detail 205.8 fps
Game 1 - Car Chase - High Detail 65.5 fps
Game 2 - Dragothic - Low Detail 300.2 fps
Game 2 - Dragothic - High Detail 154.0 fps
Game 3 - Lobby - Low Detail 193.3 fps
Game 3 - Lobby - High Detail 84.4 fps
Game 4 - Nature 145.0 fps Whoooo!!! Who's the Nature Boy now? :)
Fill Rate (Single-Texturing) 1138.6 MTexels/s
Fill Rate (Multi-Texturing) 2462.3 MTexels/s
High Polygon Count (1 Light) 64.8 MTriangles/s
High Polygon Count (8 Lights) 13.4 MTriangles/s
Environment Bump Mapping 182.0 fps
DOT3 Bump Mapping 357.1 fps
Vertex Shader 113.8 fps
Pixel Shader 204.0 fps
Advanced Pixel Shader 143.0 fps
Point Sprites 59.8 MSprites/s
 
L

Leo V

Diamond Member
Dec 4, 1999
3,123
0
0
OK I underclocked back to 2.55ghz (600fsb, 400ddr mem), and set videocard to 275/550 core/mem (just like Ti4400). Got 12497 3dmarks this way. This is still 11% faster than 2.6ghz with 250/444 core/mem on the videocard.

The lower speeds give me greater peace of mind, since I have a >3% safety margin from highest known stable MHz.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom