Here's an interesting question one might conceivably ask one of those "20 mile dirt road" people.
"We (the USPS) think it would save the government money if we only delivered mail to you twice a week. Are you inclined to save the government money? Or do you want full service?"
I suppose you could have choice of service levels to local communities. Then again, there would be those within such communities who think full service is needed. But at some point, I suppose a majority of residents could have their way. This doesn't always work well for other types of public decisions, and we should think about the consequences.
But it's probably the best approach to stand firm on what USPS has given us for a hundred years or more -- in fact, almost 240 years, if I'm not mistaken, but easily 200.
Getting rid of sorting machines during a period of low demand is like throwing away surplus capital equipment that may be more useful in the future or at least redeployed elsewhere. Redeployment elsewhere would be a viable option for a business professional. Where did DeJoy plan to redeploy these assets already belonging to the USPS?
If there were a clear path to answer for that, I can see DeJoy facing some penalty, maybe jail time. I could be wrong. But it's not as though he had a plan to do something with the surplus -- is it?
See, that would be like deciding the Air Force had too many planes, so they'd better just cut some of them up or carted off to the airplane graveyard.