• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Poor Hawley's book has been cancelled.

Yup just another case of libs silencing conservatives.

**no morons, this is a case of free business not wanting to fuck up their reputation
 
I'd love to experience the Schadenfreude on this one, but I expect he will just find a a more ignoble publisher and they will add crap like: "Read the book, they tried to censor!".
 
"Poor Hawley's book has been cancelled."
..
"Poor Hawley has been cancelled."
..
"Hawley has been cancelled."
..
"Hawley cancelled."

*SOLD*
 
"We did not come to this decision lightly," Simon & Schuster added. "As a publisher it will always be our mission to amplify a variety of voices and viewpoints: at the same time we take seriously our larger public responsibility as citizens, and cannot support Senator Hawley after his role in what became a dangerous threat to our democracy and freedom."

Hawley in a statement responded to Simon & Schuster's decision by calling the move "Orwellian" and a "direct assault on the First Amendment" — even though as a graduate of Yale Law School he likely knows the First Amendment is about government restricting free speech and not forcing a private company to publish his work.

"Only approved speech can now be published," Hawley lamented. "This is the Left looking to cancel everyone they don't approve of. I will fight this cancel culture with everything I have. We'll see you in court."
Yale should take back Hawley's law degree, as he obviously failed to learn the law during his time there.
But at the same time, his statement does represent well the Trumper mentality that their 'freedom' requires that they be able to overthrow democracy and the rule of law, and to force others to their will, or else they're oppressed victims.
 
"Oh Johnny, Did you back the wrong horse"

4146daac-39fe-483d-b257-79bdb5a02b76_screenshot.jpg
 
Sadly, as expected, he finds another outlet for his screed:
But.. but.. he said he had been silenced and his free speech rights infringed upon..

But seriously, the fucking audacity of a United States Senator claiming that a private company could ever silence his speech.. when he has free access to all the publishing powers of the United States govt at his disposal.. some people's noses are unbloodied only because it is illegal to bloody them.
 
Last edited:
It’d be all purchases by/for him to gain bestseller status like almost all conservative writers do.

He will probably be on Fox promoting the book, to the cult audience, that will buy it because Hannity tells them to, and never read it, because if they actually read books, they wouldn't be in the Fox cult.
 
He will probably be on Fox promoting the book, to the cult audience, that will buy it because Hannity tells them to, and never read it, because if they actually read books, they wouldn't be in the Fox cult.
A person who won't read has no advantage over one who can't read. - Mark Twain
 
It’d be all purchases by/for him to gain bestseller status like almost all conservative writers do.

Yep. That's why I posted (I think in some other thread?) about how the book cancellation likely was going to save Hawley a shitload of money, wherein he could just dump it in e-Book and get probably more legit sales, while it boosting his rep with right wingers.
 
Given his past approach, I'm only half-surprised Hawley didn't demand a new law forcing book publishers to carry titles against their will.
 
Get rid of the Hose of Lords, increase representation in the House to at least double the number of representatives.
 
Back
Top