Poll: Xvid or Divx

bob4432

Lifer
Sep 6, 2003
11,726
45
91
want to put a couple movies on a single dvd or laptop hdd and want to try out autogk, i own the movies, this is just for portability and not for piracy. i want to use the full resolution of the dvd which i think is 720x480 and these will be played on a laptop, so just stereo sound.

which codec would you use?
 

Bateluer

Lifer
Jun 23, 2001
27,730
8
0
I usually use Divx5 because its faster, but XviD and DivX both produce very good looking AVIs.
 

Queasy

Moderator<br>Console Gaming
Aug 24, 2001
31,796
2
0
I use XVid because the FairUse proggy is easier to use (to me) than AutoGK.
 

bob4432

Lifer
Sep 6, 2003
11,726
45
91
how much time does it usually take to encode a movie to xvid/divx? - 2.8c@3.15/1GB Ram
 

nageov3t

Lifer
Feb 18, 2004
42,808
83
91
I don't really care... I just wish all the encoders could get together and decide on a standardized format for video. it's an f'ing pain.
 

0roo0roo

No Lifer
Sep 21, 2002
64,795
84
91
xvid, fair use. quality is for all intents and purposes the same. its recompressing compressed video anyways.
 

shiranai

Member
May 9, 2005
81
0
0
I'm purely an Xvid user, but I voted Divx simply because it's supposedly much faster. For your purposes, the differences between the two codecs is fairly insignificant, aside from the fact that Divx is a proprietary commercial codec and the encoder comes with adware that you have to disable with a small registry edit (or, at least it did the last time I downloaded it).
 

Trevelyan

Diamond Member
Dec 10, 2000
4,077
0
71
Originally posted by: Queasy
I use XVid because the FairUse proggy is easier to use (to me) than AutoGK.

Really? I use AutoGK and I recently bought FairUse but haven't taken the time to try to use it... AutoGK seems very simple, don't know how much easier it can get :p
 

Bateluer

Lifer
Jun 23, 2001
27,730
8
0
Originally posted by: bob4432
how much time does it usually take to encode a movie to xvid/divx? - 2.8c@3.15/1GB Ram

I'd say around 3.5 to 4.5 hours, depending on the settings you choose.
 

bob4432

Lifer
Sep 6, 2003
11,726
45
91
ok, since it appeas that autogk has spyware in it, what would you all use? fair use? any spyware?
 

magomago

Lifer
Sep 28, 2002
10,973
14
76
I think Xvid looks better. If you want more detail than this forum could ever possibly provide, go to doom9.org
 

bob4432

Lifer
Sep 6, 2003
11,726
45
91
Originally posted by: bamacre
Originally posted by: bob4432
ok, since it appeas that autogk has spyware in it, what would you all use? fair use? any spyware?

Nope. And I love it. Linky

thanks d/l and will try :) looks like the the lite version is exactly what i am looking at, but hey if it works like they say i might just buy the full version for a job well done :)

how does dr divx compare?
 

IceBreakerG

Member
Apr 22, 2005
121
0
0
I've used Dr. Divx before and for simplicity, it's awesome. Very very very simple to use. I've also used programs like FlaskMPEG (MUCH more complex than programs like Dr. DivX). I don't have any experience with Fair Use, but if you're going from DVD to XviD or DivX then it can't hurt to give it a try :)
 

bob4432

Lifer
Sep 6, 2003
11,726
45
91
damn, just finished up with fair use and it is damn clear, although the video is just 584x240. i will bump it up tonight to something closer to 720x480 as this ratio is very wide, but the quality is excellent for a 2 hour movie that is only ~700MB.
 

SelArom

Senior member
Sep 28, 2004
872
0
0
www.djselarom.com
divx might not be free but I use it since it's more likely to be supported in things like dvd players (like the dvp 642!) and I don't like the video quality of xvid. maybe i'm crazy but I think it makes video look like vhs!

-SelArom