Originally posted by: pyonir
horse.
beaten.
death.
Originally posted by: dolph
Originally posted by: pyonir
horse.
beaten.
death.
really? please link to the post that has a poll with questions similar to the ones posed here, i couldn't find it after searching.
Originally posted by: pyonir
talk to etech...i'm sure he has three or four bookmarked.
Originally posted by: RossMAN
Originally posted by: pyonir
horse.
beaten.
death.
speaking
from
experience?
Originally posted by: pyonir
Originally posted by: RossMAN
Originally posted by: pyonir
horse.
beaten.
death.
speaking
from
experience?
actually, yes. i participated in a lot of those 30 or so threads about this last year. the "It won't be happening" mod has stated numerous times that no changes are being planned or considered.
Originally posted by: aphex
/me prods pyonir with a blunt rod.
Originally posted by: pyonir
Originally posted by: aphex
/me prods pyonir with a blunt rod.
:Q You keep your 'rod' away from me!
Originally posted by: BatmanNate
it would give more weight to the content of a post.
Originally posted by: Zenmervolt
Give me one good reason why this forum should buck the established tradition of displaying postcounts. As far as the theory that people post crap just to boost postcount, I doubt that can be backed up. Most of the crap that gets posted would be posted regardless of whether postcounts were visible or not.
ZV
Originally posted by: NumbaJuan
sure, whynot, i mean...i ran out of fingers & toes a long time ago![]()
Originally posted by: ViRGE
Originally posted by: SOSTrooper
Our status should be determined by how long we're been a member, not how much we talk.
Now, the problem with that is that we have people who have registered and never, or almost never talk. Should someone be a lifer simply because they've made 10 posts in the last 3 years?
Originally posted by: Scitex
Too bad they can't go by the number of visits, numbers of posts read, or time spent on the forums. Maybe that would help eliminate some of the useless drivel.....
Originally posted by: Zenmervolt
Give me one good reason why this forum should buck the established tradition of displaying postcounts. As far as the theory that people post crap just to boost postcount, I doubt that can be backed up. Most of the crap that gets posted would be posted regardless of whether postcounts were visible or not.
ZV
Originally posted by: dolph
Originally posted by: Zenmervolt
Give me one good reason why this forum should buck the established tradition of displaying postcounts. As far as the theory that people post crap just to boost postcount, I doubt that can be backed up. Most of the crap that gets posted would be posted regardless of whether postcounts were visible or not.
ZV
why does it matter if people see one's post count? if it doesn't matter, then the logical thing to do would be not displaying it because it serves no purpose. "established tradition" isn't a good enough answer to keep them visible. i thnk the burden of proof lies on you to give a good reason to display the amount of posts one has.
