Poll: Would you accept gay marriages?

Gyrene

Banned
Jun 6, 2002
2,841
0
0
No. It spits in the face of the tradition of marriage. Let them enjoy a partnership together, let them share in the benefits, I don't care as long as I don't see it. But to call it marriage is completely wrong. The end purpose of marriage is to have a family, to spread your genes, and to continue your family legacy. Gay "marriages" would not do so, and as so cannot be considered a traditional marriage. However, I have no strong conviction either way.
 

LakAttack

Senior member
Oct 29, 2002
533
0
0
Originally posted by: dtyn
No. It spits in the face of the tradition of marriage. Let them enjoy a partnership together, let them share in the benefits, I don't care as long as I don't see it. But to call it marriage is completely wrong. The end purpose of marriage is to have a family, to spread your genes, and to continue your family legacy. Gay "marriages" would not do so, and as so cannot be considered a traditional marriage. However, I have no strong conviction either way.

I am curious. What if a hetersexual man or woman is sterile? He/She would not be able "to have a family, to spread your genes, and to continue your family legacy." Should they not be allowed to marry?