• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

POLL: Will you see new Bond movie in theaters?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: MrBond
A lot of reviews are spoiling a semi-big event in the beginning of the movie, so if you don't want the movie ruined, avoid them.

MrBond - don't you already know how the ending turns out? I mean ... come on ...

Or are you John Bond, James' lesser-known but still pimptastic and stylin' younger brother? 😀

- M4H
 
Tonight! 😀😀😀

Term paper and exam period, but OH WELL. It's Bond. James Bond. 😀

Hopefully it doesn't turn out to be another disappointment like The World Is Not Enough.
 
Originally posted by: MercenaryForHire
Originally posted by: ThePresence
If you read the article you'll see that the DVD version that you'll buy in the stores will not self-destruct. It was only the free promotional version of some scenes which they handed out to reporters before the release of the movie that DID self-destruct.
So how long until we start seeing these coasters on eBay? 😀

Good old DVD-ripping. That'll preserve that content forevermore. 🙂

- M4H

hahha. That's what I was thinking. 😀
 
36 hours is about 34 more than needed to dump it down to a hard disk. These Hollywood types probably think Vitaphone is still wiz bang technology.
rolleye.gif
 
Originally posted by: Linflas
36 hours is about 34 more than needed to dump it down to a hard disk. These Hollywood types probably think Vitaphone is still wiz bang technology.
rolleye.gif

You watch it. Ripping the content will destroy your hard drive!
 
Originally posted by: joohang
Originally posted by: Linflas
36 hours is about 34 more than needed to dump it down to a hard disk. These Hollywood types probably think Vitaphone is still wiz bang technology.
rolleye.gif

You watch it. Ripping the content will destroy your hard drive!

Not until Palladium. 😀
Heard that was being activated with the next release of Windows (not Longhorn, the one after)

- M4H
 
Originally posted by: MercenaryForHire
Originally posted by: joohang
Originally posted by: Linflas
36 hours is about 34 more than needed to dump it down to a hard disk. These Hollywood types probably think Vitaphone is still wiz bang technology.
rolleye.gif

You watch it. Ripping the content will destroy your hard drive!

Not until Palladium. 😀
Heard that was being activated with the next release of Windows (not Longhorn, the one after)

- M4H

The day that is built into Windows will be the day my main OS becomes FreeBSD or Linux.
 
neato sampler disc🙂


68% rotten so far on rotten tomatoes. seems many people really like it, and some people really don't. mainly the cream of the croppers don't like it😛

anyways, i'll be watching bond🙂

i don't need to see enimem on a big screen😛
 
I'll definitely see it in theaters if I get a chance. Most of the reviews seem to be one of two extremes, either they think it's one of the best Bond movies in recent history or they think it's the worst ever. I'd be willing to bet that most of the ones that trash it are reviewers who are predisposed to dislike Bond movies anyway; probably the type that thinks every movie needs to be some serious dialog-driven drama like My Dinner With Andre or something.
rolleye.gif
The last movie sucked cheese and was easily one of the worst Bond films ever. Horrid performance by Denish Richards (not shocking) and a boring storyline. However, I liked the two Brosnan films before it.
 
Halle Berry? No thank you.

It seems like its reaching the epidomy of cheeziness and pop culture.

"Who sent you?"
"Yo mama!"
rolleye.gif
 
Originally posted by: Gr1mL0cK
Halle Berry? No thank you.

It seems like its reaching the epidomy of cheeziness and pop culture.

"Who sent you?"
"Yo mama!"
rolleye.gif

And the cheeziness of the anti-pop culturists. 😛 😉
 
This movie was much better than the last almost-garbage crap.

The North Koreans spoke bad North Korean, but this should not bother 99.9% of you. I probably liked the movie better if they were Russians.
 
i actually saw it today it was pretty good. better then the last one. and teh cars in it are SOOOOOOOOOOO much better in this one. its long tho Two and a hlf hours. but still worth seeing in the thearters
 
Originally posted by: TheEvil1
i actually saw it today it was pretty good. better then the last one. and teh cars in it are SOOOOOOOOOOO much better in this one. its long tho Two and a hlf hours. but still worth seeing in the thearters

I didn't feel like it was "long." In fact, I was quite into the movie and wished it were a little longer.

The car chases were done great. Really contrasts the *lack of* car scenes with Bond's potentially cool car (but just got cut in half after shooting a tiny missile) in the last movie.
 
she is so not better then denise richards, atleast richards was hot🙂 tacky acting works well in bond, its all tacky😛

the agent frost chick was hotter then halle. her part screams part added for pc purposes😛


anyways, it was a fun movie, most gadgets ever😛
 
Frost was hot as hell. I sort of predicted that that she'll double-cross Bond too.

I also liked Sophie Marceau in the last movie. 🙂 All these hot villain chicks. 🙂
 
Originally posted by: Aquaman
Originally posted by: joohang
Originally posted by: Zakath15
It was okay.

Halle Berry is a terrible actress.

Better than Denise Richards. 😛

Word 😀

Cheers,
Aquaman

They aren't in the movie for their acting. They are in the movie for their b00bies. And I'd take Denise Richards over Halle Berry.

 
Back
Top