Originally posted by: Eli
If anybody should get reparations, its the Native Americans.
Originally posted by: Eli
If anybody should get reparations, its the Native Americans.
Casinos?
:roll:Originally posted by: breakit23
So their reparations are foreign invaders allowing them to do what they want with their own land?Casinos?
Nice.
Originally posted by: m2kewl
you should give me reparations b/c AZNs helped build the railroads!!!
I don't really understand.Originally posted by: Vic
:roll:Originally posted by: breakit23
So their reparations are foreign invaders allowing them to do what they want with their own land?Casinos?
Nice.
No, their reparations are being allowed to exploit a highly profitable market that people of other races are not allowed to.
Not in Oregon (or most every other state). Why do you think everyone goes to Spirit Mountain? They wouldn't drive all that way if some white person could open one up in Portland.Originally posted by: Eli
I don't really understand.Originally posted by: Vic
:roll:Originally posted by: breakit23
So their reparations are foreign invaders allowing them to do what they want with their own land?Casinos?
Nice.
No, their reparations are being allowed to exploit a highly profitable market that people of other races are not allowed to.
White peope can't have a casino? 😛
You're sh!ttin' me...!? I guess I never thought about it.Originally posted by: Vic
Not in Oregon (or most every other state). Why do you think everyone goes to Spirit Mountain? They wouldn't drive all that way if some white person could open one up in Portland.Originally posted by: Eli
I don't really understand.Originally posted by: Vic
:roll:Originally posted by: breakit23
So their reparations are foreign invaders allowing them to do what they want with their own land?Casinos?
Nice.
No, their reparations are being allowed to exploit a highly profitable market that people of other races are not allowed to.
White peope can't have a casino? 😛
And this reparations talk is getting old. You all have opportunity. That is enough.
Originally posted by: Vic
Not in Oregon (or most every other state). Why do you think everyone goes to Spirit Mountain? They wouldn't drive all that way if some white person could open one up in Portland.Originally posted by: Eli
I don't really understand.Originally posted by: Vic
:roll:Originally posted by: breakit23
So their reparations are foreign invaders allowing them to do what they want with their own land?Casinos?
Nice.
No, their reparations are being allowed to exploit a highly profitable market that people of other races are not allowed to.
White peope can't have a casino? 😛
And this reparations talk is getting old. You all have opportunity. That is enough.
But the white people can't own a controlling interest, and a large chunk of the profits (pre-shareholder dividend) have to go directly back to the tribe. There are many strict regulations about Indian gaming casinos, which vary widely from state to state, but these casinos are not fronts for white operations (which it seems to me that you are implying, as have many others).Originally posted by: Childs
A white person can open up a casino anywhere theres a reservation, they just need to partner with Native Americans. Thats how the Native Americans get startup capitol to build the casinos in the first place.
Originally posted by: Vic
But the white people can't own a controlling interest, and a large chunk of the profits (pre-shareholder dividend) have to go directly back to the tribe. There are many strict regulations about Indian gaming casinos, which vary widely from state to state, but these casinos are not fronts for white operations (which it seems to me that you are implying, as have many others).Originally posted by: Childs
A white person can open up a casino anywhere theres a reservation, they just need to partner with Native Americans. Thats how the Native Americans get startup capitol to build the casinos in the first place.
And many states allow off-reservation casino sites as well, to bring a tribe closer to a large metro area and more profits.
Heh.Originally posted by: Childs
You again eh? :shocked:
Anyways, not a controlling interest no, but partnership. For a profitable casino a small stake is still good chunk of the change.
Originally posted by: Vic
Heh.Originally posted by: Childs
You again eh? :shocked:
Anyways, not a controlling interest no, but partnership. For a profitable casino a small stake is still good chunk of the change.
I would call it a fair exchange for the startup capital that helps a tribe get a profitable casino off the ground.