• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Poll: Should European Americans get reparations?

No because once they escaped they could easily fit in and not be categorized. But then again I voted no for the blacks getting reperations and I am black.

-Xionide
 
Originally posted by: breakit23
So their reparations are foreign invaders allowing them to do what they want with their own land?


Nice.
:roll:

No, their reparations are being allowed to exploit a highly profitable market that people of other races are not allowed to.
 
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: breakit23
So their reparations are foreign invaders allowing them to do what they want with their own land?


Nice.
:roll:

No, their reparations are being allowed to exploit a highly profitable market that people of other races are not allowed to.
I don't really understand.

White peope can't have a casino? 😛
 
Originally posted by: Eli
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: breakit23
So their reparations are foreign invaders allowing them to do what they want with their own land?


Nice.
:roll:

No, their reparations are being allowed to exploit a highly profitable market that people of other races are not allowed to.
I don't really understand.

White peope can't have a casino? 😛
Not in Oregon (or most every other state). Why do you think everyone goes to Spirit Mountain? They wouldn't drive all that way if some white person could open one up in Portland.

And this reparations talk is getting old. You all have opportunity. That is enough.
 
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: Eli
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: breakit23
So their reparations are foreign invaders allowing them to do what they want with their own land?


Nice.
:roll:

No, their reparations are being allowed to exploit a highly profitable market that people of other races are not allowed to.
I don't really understand.

White peope can't have a casino? 😛
Not in Oregon (or most every other state). Why do you think everyone goes to Spirit Mountain? They wouldn't drive all that way if some white person could open one up in Portland.

And this reparations talk is getting old. You all have opportunity. That is enough.
You're sh!ttin' me...!? I guess I never thought about it.

What laws prevent.. me.. from opening up a casino, for instance? 😕 I take it that's why things are.. different.. in Nevada, different laws?

And I agree, the whole reparations thing is stupid, but it is a nice thought at heart, I guess.
 
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: Eli
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: breakit23
So their reparations are foreign invaders allowing them to do what they want with their own land?


Nice.
:roll:

No, their reparations are being allowed to exploit a highly profitable market that people of other races are not allowed to.
I don't really understand.

White peope can't have a casino? 😛
Not in Oregon (or most every other state). Why do you think everyone goes to Spirit Mountain? They wouldn't drive all that way if some white person could open one up in Portland.

And this reparations talk is getting old. You all have opportunity. That is enough.

A white person can open up a casino anywhere theres a reservation, they just need to partner with Native Americans. Thats how the Native Americans get startup capitol to build the casinos in the first place.
 
Originally posted by: Childs
A white person can open up a casino anywhere theres a reservation, they just need to partner with Native Americans. Thats how the Native Americans get startup capitol to build the casinos in the first place.
But the white people can't own a controlling interest, and a large chunk of the profits (pre-shareholder dividend) have to go directly back to the tribe. There are many strict regulations about Indian gaming casinos, which vary widely from state to state, but these casinos are not fronts for white operations (which it seems to me that you are implying, as have many others).
And many states allow off-reservation casino sites as well, to bring a tribe closer to a large metro area and more profits.
 
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: Childs
A white person can open up a casino anywhere theres a reservation, they just need to partner with Native Americans. Thats how the Native Americans get startup capitol to build the casinos in the first place.
But the white people can't own a controlling interest, and a large chunk of the profits (pre-shareholder dividend) have to go directly back to the tribe. There are many strict regulations about Indian gaming casinos, which vary widely from state to state, but these casinos are not fronts for white operations (which it seems to me that you are implying, as have many others).
And many states allow off-reservation casino sites as well, to bring a tribe closer to a large metro area and more profits.

You again eh? :shocked:

Anyways, not a controlling interest no, but partnership. For a profitable casino a small stake is still good chunk of the change. And I did not imply any such thing, simply stated thats how a white person can get into the casino business. Although now I think tribes are banding together and pooling capitol for true financial autonomy and political power via lobbying. More power to em. It'll be interesting to see how they handle California's attempt to collect taxes. If they beat that, then they are a true political force to be wreckoned with. Does anyone know offhand if Native Americans on reservations are allowed to vote?
 
Originally posted by: Childs
You again eh? :shocked:

Anyways, not a controlling interest no, but partnership. For a profitable casino a small stake is still good chunk of the change.
Heh.

I would call it a fair exchange for the startup capital that helps a tribe get a profitable casino off the ground.
 
How about I don't pay a dime since my family is only 2 generations into America.
 
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: Childs
You again eh? :shocked:

Anyways, not a controlling interest no, but partnership. For a profitable casino a small stake is still good chunk of the change.
Heh.

I would call it a fair exchange for the startup capital that helps a tribe get a profitable casino off the ground.

Agreed. Thats how things are done...someone needs to provide capital.
 
Back
Top