• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Poll: Is there enough publicly known evidence to indict Donald Trump

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Is there enough publicly known evidence for an indictment of Trump?

  • No. I would never vote to indict no matter what Trump did.

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    46
Well let's see the "oh I don't support him anymore" camp. Pundits are expecting Pence to campaign on, I support all the policies but without the whiny baby in charge. And was that recent poll of Republicans accurate, like 55% support the party and 35% support the orange monkey.
 
No I think not.
Please answer for all of us. We all knew who Trump was before 2016. AFAIC none of what he has done should be a surprise.

Did you really not know what kind of person he was? Did you know who he was but thought Hilary was so much worse?
 
Last edited:
Please answer for all of us. We all knew who Trump was before 2016. AFAIC none of what he has done should be a surprise.

Did you really not know what kind pf person he was? Did you know who he was but thought Hilary was so much worse?

I think it's kinda funny you want honesty out of Mr secrets
 
Please answer for all of us. We all knew who Trump was before 2016. AFAIC none of what he has done should be a surprise.

Did you really not know what kind of person he was? Did you know who he was but thought Hilary was so much worse?

I knew he was utterly unskilled and unsuited but he turned out worse than expected. He has quite a knack for empowering the worst sycophants and running out any advisor that had any sense of duty or responsibility to the nation.
 
I knew he was utterly unskilled and unsuited but he turned out worse than expected. He has quite a knack for empowering the worst sycophants and running out any advisor that had any sense of duty or responsibility to the nation.
Really, I’m actually surprised there wasn’t wars started because of the orange monkey.
 
Well let's see the "oh I don't support him anymore" camp. Pundits are expecting Pence to campaign on, I support all the policies but without the whiny baby in charge. And was that recent poll of Republicans accurate, like 55% support the party and 35% support the orange monkey.
Hope springs eternal.
 
Well let's see the "oh I don't support him anymore" camp. Pundits are expecting Pence to campaign on, I support all the policies but without the whiny baby in charge. And was that recent poll of Republicans accurate, like 55% support the party and 35% support the orange monkey.
They support the polices? Really? Trump once said in an open meeting to Nancy Pelosi he would sign comprehensive immigration reform. Once his people got to him the correction was issued.
 
Why not...didn’t you agree with his positions, you seemed to defend/excuse them here.


I have stated in other threads why I supported him in the past election.

I did support some of his positions on immigration etc. I have grown to have a dislike for his methods and his baggage real and perceived.
 
Please answer for all of us. We all knew who Trump was before 2016. AFAIC none of what he has done should be a surprise.

Did you really not know what kind of person he was? Did you know who he was but thought Hilary was so much worse?


I did have the opinion that Hillary was worse. I still do.
 
I did have the opinion that Hillary was worse. I still do.
Don't think attempting to overthrow the results of a free and fair election goes to the top of the list?

Not even Nixon would stoop to that level. Really think Hillary would attempt anything like it?
 
Don't think attempting to overthrow the results of a free and fair election goes to the top of the list?

Not even Nixon would stoop to that level. Really think Hillary would attempt anything like it?
It weird how everyone always ad's "free and fair". Why is that? When you ad the free and fair is sounds like your selling something.
 
It weird how everyone always ad's "free and fair". Why is that? When you ad the free and fair is sounds like your selling something.
Ok, I'll go with fair and legal. I would love to see his list of Hillary's negative traits. I then can list out Trump's and we can all compare.

I'm not going to ask him because that will divulge a secret.
 
It weird how everyone always ad's "free and fair". Why is that? When you ad the free and fair is sounds like your selling something.
Because he is, democracy. Having an election is not enough. Russia has elections.
It has to be both free and fair for it to matter.
There are countries that have free elections, but they are unfair. Anyone can run, but the outcome is predetermined.
There are countries that have fair elections, but they are not free. Only approved candidates can be voted for. One of the hand picked people will win.
Only when it is both do you have a real democracy.
 
Because he is, democracy. Having an election is not enough. Russia has elections.
It has to be both free and fair for it to matter.
There are countries that have free elections, but they are unfair. Anyone can run, but the outcome is predetermined.
There are countries that have fair elections, but they are not free. Only approved candidates can be voted for. One of the hand picked people will win.
Only when it is both do you have a real democracy.
That you actually had to explain that...

JFC!!
 
Back
Top