Poll: How many here have actually read the bible?

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

KK

Lifer
Jan 2, 2001
15,903
4
81
Not much at all, sounded like jibber-jabber to me. I'd rather read a fishing magazine.
 

hemiram

Senior member
Mar 16, 2005
629
0
0
I read the whole thing, I forced myself to. How anyone could believe there is anything special about it and that it's even more than slightly true is totally beyond me, let alone saying it's 100% the word of god.

I've basically been an atheist since the age of seven, haven't been to church since the age of 8. Last time I went, the minister was talking about Adam living to some insane age, and I couldn't take it. I asked my grandmother why the minister was telling those ridiculous stories, and she got all worked up, and yelled at me that they absolutely were true, and how could I not believe them, after all, they were in the bible. I didn't say anything, but I never felt the same about her again, I had thought she was someone who was really sensible, and after she said that, I thought of her as slightly crazy. She died a few months later.
 

colonel

Golden Member
Apr 22, 2001
1,783
20
81
I read all the Bible, but there are a couple books in the old testament, not really important..........my advice is start the Bible from the New Testament, reading the life of Jesus (the Bible is revelation of Jesus as savior), and how the profets in the old testament talk about him.
 

Penth

Senior member
Mar 9, 2004
933
0
0
Originally posted by: Tab
Originally posted by: datalink7
Originally posted by: Vic
I have read the entire Bible cover to cover twice, first time KJV, second time NIV. The Gospels are excellent, of course. Other parts are mixed. Judeo-Christianity tries but, except for Jesus, never seems to truly understand God.

I have read the Book of Mormon along with the D&C and POGP. I won't do so again, 'nuff said.

I have also read the Quran. On that note, I am currently reading "The Essential Rumi" with translations by Coleman Barks. No religious is perfect, but Islam IMO understands God better than any other major religion, and I say this even though I do not consider myself a Muslim.

What do you mean by "understands God"? Is this a comparison of how close they are in line with our understanding of what God is, or a certain consistency within the text themselves?

I'd like to know the same as well...

What do the terms I highlighted mean exactly?


Sorry to bring back an old thread, but I just came across it and found it interesting. There really should be a religion forum seperate from off-topic. Anyway, by D&C he means Doctrine and Covenants. POGP is Pearl of Great Price. Both are part of the standard works, along with the King James version of The Bible and The Book of Mormon, of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints - more often referred to as mormons here on the forums.
 

Velk

Senior member
Jul 29, 2004
734
0
0
Originally posted by: aidanjm
Originally posted by: Spamela
the passage from Ezekiel basically is a prophecy of the punishments
that the people of Israel will have to endure as a consequence
of their sin - they'll be so humbled that they'll have to bake their
bread using animal dung for fuel.

that doesn't seem like a very plausible explanation. Cooking with cow dung is a pretty widespread practice around the world. Cow dung burns at a very high temperature, what's the problem with cooking with it? Why is it humbling? Dried, aged cow dung is similar to old wood, it has no smell, it's light, stacks well, etc. Doesn't that passqage imply people will have to actually eat human sh1t? Seems kind of sick to me...


"And thou shalt eat it as barley cakes, and thou shalt bake it with"....

an oven ?

a fire ?

Seems pretty clear from context that whatever it is being baked with is not part of the recipe, it just has archaic syntax. Humiliation is very much a cultural thing, that you would not expect why something from thousands of years ago was humiliating or taboo is expected rather than unusual.

Honestly, if you want to complain about the bible, there are much better passages to choose.
 

wiredspider

Diamond Member
Jun 3, 2001
5,239
0
0
i have never read the thing or even touched one, but then again i'm not very religious by any means.
 

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,652
6,219
126
Originally posted by: CaptnKirk
Just like most other novels - everyone dies in the end.

Now maybe if they make it into a feel good movie & get the right actors . . .
or perhaps MTV makes a Hot Rap Video . . . .





</ sarcasm>

Actually they don't. As best as I can discern, they leave Earth, seemingly to another planet.
 

PatboyX

Diamond Member
Aug 10, 2001
7,024
0
0
id have to look and its too early for me to check. but im pretty sure ive read all of the "old testiment" (maybe not so much the genealogy) and a good chunk of the "new."
erroring on the side of accuracy, i opted for "about half."
 

cquark

Golden Member
Apr 4, 2004
1,741
0
0
Some statistics on American Biblical illiteracy:
Biblical knowledge (Biblical illiteracy is rampant):

* Perhaps 15 percent of Americans participate in Bible studies.
* The number of people who read the Bible, at least occasionally
is 59 percent.
* Less than 50 percent of Americans can name the first book of the
Bible (Genesis).
* Only 1/3 of Americans know who delivered the Sermon on the Mount
(more people identified Billy Graham rather than Jesus).
* Twenty-five percent of Americans don't know what is celebrated
on Easter (the Resurrection of Christ, the foundational event of
Christianity).
* Twelve percent of Christians think that Noah's wife is Joan of Arc.
* Eighty percent of born-again Christians (including George W.
Bush) think it is the Bible that says "God helps them that help
themselves." (Actually it was said by Benjamin Franklin.)

Why don't more people read the Bible?

* Sixty-four percent of Americans say they are too busy.
* Eighty percent say the bible is confusing, probably because they
are reading the King James Version with its Shakespearean-era
language.
 

piasabird

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
17,168
60
91
Not everyone died in the end in the Bible. However, you have to pay particular attention to what you are reading. Like any book some things are mentioned in a round about way. When Jesus was confronted about what John asked him to do Jesus says to one of his apostles what is it to thee if he should tarry till I return? Then there was another famous prophet who ascended to heaven on a chariot of fire. According to several texts in the bible the city where Enoch lived was perfected and the entire city was translated and taken into Heaven.

When reading the bible look for references to books or writings or prophets that no longer exist. In the new testament when Jesus was presented in the temple by Mary and Joseph a woman called Anna was referred to as a prophetess is mentioned but you do not ever see a book of Anna the Prophetess or her prophecies. Often the people in the Bible mention "It is written that . . ." but they never mention what they are quoting and they just expect the reader to know about it.

In the book of Mormon they refer to the book of Zenock. However, the book has never been found as far as I know. When studying some information on the dead sea scrolls I came across some reference to the book of Enoch which is still missing but beleived to have been seen.

Many people in the 1800's may have lived in more remote places or may have only owned one book. You guessed it, the family Bible. Many people learned to read, reading the bilbe.
 

Jakebrake

Member
May 11, 2005
196
0
0
There are a lot of citations or "broken links" in the Bible because Emperor Constantine was one of the early people to majorly revise and edit the books of the Bible. He out right tossed out books that did not suit his purpose.

Link
 

drinkmorejava

Diamond Member
Jun 24, 2004
3,567
7
81
That's almost depressing, I have 3 of them in my room and have never actually read the whole thing. I suppose I might get around to it this summer.
 

imported_Condor

Diamond Member
Sep 22, 2004
5,425
0
0
Parts of the bible and the entire 4 volumes of the Gulag Archipelago. I learned much more about liberals from the Gulag!
 

Infohawk

Lifer
Jan 12, 2002
17,844
1
0
Originally posted by: cquark
* Eighty percent of born-again Christians (including George W.
Bush) think it is the Bible that says "God helps them that help
themselves." (Actually it was said by Benjamin Franklin.)

How convenient. I don't know what's worse. The ones that just make up the bible or the ones that twist it to be in line with what they want it to believe (you know, the ones that say rich people are good christians despite the fact jesus says its more than impossible for rich people to go to heaven).
 

Whaspe

Senior member
Jan 1, 2005
430
0
0
Originally posted by: Infohawk
Originally posted by: cquark
* Eighty percent of born-again Christians (including George W.
Bush) think it is the Bible that says "God helps them that help
themselves." (Actually it was said by Benjamin Franklin.)

How convenient. I don't know what's worse. The ones that just make up the bible or the ones that twist it to be in line with what they want it to believe (you know, the ones that say rich people are good christians despite the fact jesus says its more than impossible for rich people to go to heaven).

Jesus never said that. He said to the young ruler, give all you have to the poor and come follow me. The man went away sad because he had amassed great fortune and was unwilling to give it up. It was not his money that was the problem but his love of it. Jesus was placed in the grave of a wealthy friend of his, Joseph of Arimathea (actually a member of the Sanhedrin). The point is that it is tough for the wealthy to follow Jesus because they put too much faith in their possessions.

I've read the Bible a number of times.
 

Infohawk

Lifer
Jan 12, 2002
17,844
1
0
Originally posted by: Whaspe
Jesus never said that. He said to the young ruler, give all you have to the poor and come follow me. The man went away sad because he had amassed great fortune and was unwilling to give it up. It was not his money that was the problem but his love of it. Jesus was placed in the grave of a wealthy friend of his, Joseph of Arimathea (actually a member of the Sanhedrin). The point is that it is tough for the wealthy to follow Jesus because they put too much faith in their possessions.

I've read the Bible a number of times.

Just because you've read the Bible a number of times, doesn't mean I'm going to buy your self-interested interpretation.

The actual text is very clear. Jesus speaks in allegories. He said:

it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God.

In essence something impossible is more likely than a rich guy getting into heaven. Spin it in whatever way makes you feel better.
 

Whaspe

Senior member
Jan 1, 2005
430
0
0
I was answering the question that I've read the Bible a number of times. I would say you are the one spinning things. The Eye of a Needle was a gate in the wall of Jerusalem where camels had to "crawl" in order to make it through. Thus not impossible but definitely difficult.

Edited to correct my screwup.
 

kogase

Diamond Member
Sep 8, 2004
5,213
0
0
Originally posted by: Whaspe
I was answering the question that I've read the Bible a number of times. I would say you are the one spinning things. The Eye of a Camel was a gate in the wall of Jerusalem where camels had to "crawl" in order to make it through. Thus not impossible but definitely difficult.

The quote says "eye of a needle"...
 

Infohawk

Lifer
Jan 12, 2002
17,844
1
0
There's no spinning on my end. You just have to look at the plain language and not let any of the outside analysis from various non-canon texts tell you what it's saying.
 

Whaspe

Senior member
Jan 1, 2005
430
0
0
Originally posted by: Infohawk
There's no spinning on my end. You just have to look at the plain language and not let any of the outside analysis from various non-canon texts tell you what it's saying.

So you're a literalist then.