POLL: Engine preference

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

GTaudiophile

Lifer
Oct 24, 2000
29,767
33
81
What about the best of both worlds: BMW's 333hp (262 ft-lbs @ 4900) 3.2L Inline-6 found in the M3?
 

trmiv

Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
14,670
18
81
Neither. I'd rather have a 355ci small block chevy with 12.5 to 1 compression, and a holley 4 barrell 850 cfm carb, that will run all day at 7000+ rpms, and make over 600 horsepower. Come to think of it, I already have one! And later this year, I'll be building a 377 that will wind even faster.
 

trmiv

Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
14,670
18
81


<<

<< that will run all day at 7000+ rpms >>



You must have one HUGE gas tank to do that ;)
>>



You know what I meant dammit. :D ;) And believe me, this thing sucks down some gas, and gas for it isn't cheap. $4.50 a gallon last time we bought it!
 

Ornery

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
20,022
17
81
Try a poll with a REAL American V8, like a 5.7L (350ci) or larger and see what happens. Didja pick a weenie 4.6L on purpose or what?
 

blueghost75

Golden Member
Dec 12, 2000
1,086
0
0
if it is made by BMW and has 6 or more cylinders, I will take it....:D

nissan makes a great 6 cyl for the maximas too though. Other than that, some of the bigger chevys are nice.

I wouldn't be caught dead in a 4cyl, they don't weigh enough, and around here, if you get in a front end colision, you won't have much to protect you.....
 

Pacfanweb

Lifer
Jan 2, 2000
13,158
59
91
<<I've never heard a Pontiac 455, but I do know that the Ram Air IV heads off of the 400 can be built to breathe fairly well.>>

RAIV heads flow well stock. They made 455's from 1970-76.



I like my own big block Chevy that has about 640hp. :D
 

Pacfanweb

Lifer
Jan 2, 2000
13,158
59
91
I don't like Ford engines much, but I can't crack on the potential of the 4.6 and 5.4 liter engines.

A friend of mine has a Mustang race car with 1210 hp (yes, 1,210hp) at the REAR WHEELS. That's with a turbocharged 5.4. I'm impressed.
 
Jun 18, 2000
11,220
783
126
I'd prefer the "neck snapping" acceleration of a .6L - 1L high revving 4-cyl. :)

Edit: Yea, yea, I know. Not a fair comparison. For car engines, I prefer the smoothness of >4 cylinder engines, but don't care for large displacement. A happy medium - 3.2 or 3.6L V6 perhaps.
 

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,408
8,596
126


<< i like my cars to actually be able to turn >>

because the turning radius on that mustang isn't the same as on a celica and smaller than an rsx.

oh wait, it is.




another vote for VQ35 or the M I6. (heheh bond and bmw). though with the poll as it is i went for the 4.6 modular V8.
 

Calcio

Senior member
Sep 28, 2001
253
0
0
I'll have to put in a vote for my 5.3L 300+ HP
there's no replacement for displacement
 

NikPreviousAcct

No Lifer
Aug 15, 2000
52,763
1
0


<< American roarer like 4.6L(281cid) 260hp V8 in Ford Mustang GT >>

The only way to go. :) If you've looked under the hood of a vintage mustang compared to a '89 Honda Accord, you'd see that the Mustang is MUCH easier to work on.

nik
 

PsychoAndy

Lifer
Dec 31, 2000
10,735
0
0


<<

<< American roarer like 4.6L(281cid) 260hp V8 in Ford Mustang GT >>

The only way to go. :) If you've looked under the hood of a vintage mustang compared to a '89 Honda Accord, you'd see that the Mustang is MUCH easier to work on.

nik
>>



hell, the alternator on my 88 is a bitch to get at. you have to remove the wheel and part of the driveshaft to get to it.
 

Demon-Xanth

Lifer
Feb 15, 2000
20,551
2
81
Probably been said a bunch of times. But the 4.6 Mustang motor isn't really a good choice for "roarer". 460, 454, 455, 440, 488. Now those are the numbers :)
 

LAUST

Diamond Member
Sep 13, 2000
8,957
1
81
V8,

Biggest thing is I want room under the hood, that shoehorning engines in sucks