I'm technically a manager because I'm 1/3 owner of a consulting firm. I'm typically responsible for the hiring, making sure everyone has what they need, etc.
I personally prefer a very flat hierarchy. I don't look at management as above anyone else; rather, just someone specialized in a different role. Finding the absolute best talent and keeping them happy is a talent all by itself, and that's what I try to do. Creative people can't be managed, in my opinion; rather, you simply have to yield their talents to the most appropriate task at the moment while still giving them full creative license.
The above probably isn't the case for those that manage fast food restaurants or any other type of an environment where many of the workers aren't necessarily capable (or willing) of working independently. I think, at least at its most ideal, management's primary purpose should be to remove the obstacles in the way of the talent.
I personally prefer a very flat hierarchy. I don't look at management as above anyone else; rather, just someone specialized in a different role. Finding the absolute best talent and keeping them happy is a talent all by itself, and that's what I try to do. Creative people can't be managed, in my opinion; rather, you simply have to yield their talents to the most appropriate task at the moment while still giving them full creative license.
The above probably isn't the case for those that manage fast food restaurants or any other type of an environment where many of the workers aren't necessarily capable (or willing) of working independently. I think, at least at its most ideal, management's primary purpose should be to remove the obstacles in the way of the talent.