MotionMan
Lifer
- Jan 11, 2006
- 17,124
- 12
- 81
makes no sense why the police attack OWS but not the ignorant tea partiers.
Serious question: Which tea partiers?
MotionMan
Did I miss the answer to this question?
MotionMan
makes no sense why the police attack OWS but not the ignorant tea partiers.
Serious question: Which tea partiers?
MotionMan
Ok, so can we all now agree that the protestors deserved it?
No. I'm still of the opinion that they were way too soft on them.
Pepper spray is warranted whenever someone refuses to comply with an order from law enforcement. Even if you feel the order is unlawful, you comply with the order and fight it later.
The last thing cops want is to escalate the contact to a physical struggle that can lead to one or both parties being injured. Using pepper spray causes non-lethal pain and temporary disables the subject so they can be taken into custody or disbursed as safely as possible.
If you are going to protest, and refuse to comply with orders from law enforcement, expect to taste some pepper spray. The alternative compliance hold the officer will have to use to physically move the subject will probably hurt a lot more.
Also, none of these protesters were forced to leave or arrested for what they were saying. NOBODY HAD THEIR FREE SPEECH RIGHTS TAKEN AWAY. THEY WERE REMOVED FOR TRESPASSING, NOT BECAUSE OF THEIR MESSAGE. Nobody can camp out in a public park. Your free speech rights don't include the right to exercise them wherever you want at the expense of others.
Though, as much as I support lot of the points of the OWS protesters, I don't think what they're doing will have any effect whatsoever on the government and they should probably just give it up. When's the last time the government actually listened to it's citizens?
You totally missed the point. The point is there was NO physical contact or even the threat of contact. They were sitting passively on the ground. There was absolutely no need for pepper spray, hence you are a moron.
I missed the point? Please reread my comments. There was no physical contact BECAUSE the cops used pepper spray rather than physically dragging the trespassers out and risking injury to one or both parties. Leaving the protesters/trespassers where they were was not on option.
Who's the moron?
I missed the point? Please reread my comments. There was no physical contact BECAUSE the cops used pepper spray rather than physically dragging the trespassers out and risking injury to one or both parties. Leaving the protesters/trespassers where they were was not on option.
Who's the moron?
Pepper spray is warranted whenever someone refuses to comply with an order from law enforcement. Even if you feel the order is unlawful, you comply with the order and fight it later.
This is funny as shit. They deserved a good hosing down with pepper spray. The rule all these OWS Pussies are ignoring is that their rights cannot infringe on anyones else's rights. That is mainly what the thick headed bastards do not understand. How stupid can they be? They are proving they can be nearly retarded. Seeing the videos just makes me wish I could hose a few of them with pepper spray.
Yep. Again, when you are given an order by the police, you do it. Otherwise, you accept the consequences. Feel lucky you only got pepper sprayed.
Yep. Again, when you are given an order by the police, you do it. Otherwise, you accept the consequences. Feel lucky you only got pepper sprayed.
Any order?
Good to see we still have the best and the brightest in America.
This UC davis incident is even worse because the students sitting on the ground were taking the most extreme passive posture they possibly could.
Yes, the brightest moved and were not pepper sprayed. The morons are the ones who got sprayed.
Did I mention I hate hippie protestors? I'm not a big fan of cops either, but hippie protestors trump cops in my book.
Well a specific example would be, "move or you will be pepper sprayed." I would recommend doing what you are told. Otherwise, I don't want to hear your whining about being sprayed.
I have to disagree with you here.
The most passive posture would have been to sit, without arms locked, not requiring police to wrestle with each and every one of them in order to handcuff them and drag/lift/haul them to the wagon. The students have to go through that process once, while the officers have to repeat it 20(?) times, increasing the chance of injury each time they are forced to do it. The students were given ample warning that they were leaving the police no option but to subdue them before being cuffed, to each and every one of them, face to face, so they all understood what was about to happen.
I do understand why they were doing this for the "outrage" and attention it drew to their cause, which appears to have had at least some results, but anyone saying that subduing the students w/ pepper spray was somehow wrong is not looking at the situation from both sides, and putting themselves in the place of the officers who must wrestle with 20 students.
This process decreased risk of permanent injury to all parties involved, and also accomplished exactly what the protesters were looking for.
Both sides are happy, the world is still here, and hopefully something good will come out of all of this.
What about "dance a little jig or you will be pepper sprayed."
Or "bark like a dog or you will be pepper sprayed."
You really have no self respect do you?
What about "dance a little jig or you will be pepper sprayed."
Or "bark like a dog or you will be pepper sprayed."
You really have no self respect do you?
Cops aren't allowed to use pepper spray on those who aren't showing aggression/being a threat.
You disagree with me, but YOU'RE WRONG. Unless the students display a threatening demeanor, cops AREN'T allowed to use pepper spray. Anthony Bologna got in trouble for LESS.
