Police bullet lands perfectly in suspect's gun chamber

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Jun 14, 2003
10,442
0
0
Originally posted by: ryan256
Originally posted by: bradruth

Right, but how would you collect a fired bullet without having it hit something?

Thats forensic's problem dude. I'm just saying I think it would fit.


forensic could easily prove this

all they have to do is find deposits from the bullet on inside of the barrel on the other mans gun (assuming the officers bullet went that way)
 

TGS

Golden Member
May 3, 2005
1,849
0
0
Originally posted by: CPA
Originally posted by: GreenGhost
Now with PICtures:

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/268168_shootingfollow27.html

I can't make out the damage they say is in the pic.

The round made it into the exposed chamber pushing the suspects round backwards. You can see the round compressed against the opening of the cylinder. Of course this is much more feasible than what most people were suggesting, that of being fired without impact down the barrel.
 

poopaskoopa

Diamond Member
Sep 12, 2000
4,836
1
81
Originally posted by: bradruth
Originally posted by: pontifex
the bullet doesn't expand until it actually hits something.
i don't know enough about calibers to know if a .40 would fit into the barrel of a .38 though. was the .38 loaded with a round chambered? i'm wondering if the impact from the .40 would make the .38 round go off?

Originally posted by: ryan256
Oh btw Bradruth. Remember a bullet doesn't mushroom til it hits something. Having not hit anything before entering the barrel of the other gun it could possably go in. Of course the angle & numerous other variables would have to be perfect. Hence the low probability.

Right, but how would you collect a fired bullet without having it hit something?
I've shot at a bundle of phonebooks with FMJ 9mm rounds, and after 4 books the bullet stopped penetrating. I remember that some of the bullets were in really good shape. I didn't take any measurements to see if they were bent out of shape in any way, but they looked pretty much intact.
 

Horus

Platinum Member
Dec 27, 2003
2,838
1
0
Originally posted by: pontifex
Originally posted by: bradruth
Originally posted by: FoBoT
as much as i support law enforcement, i think the chance someone planted that bullet is higher than the chance it was shot into there

but anything is possible i suppose

The only problem with that is that the bullet was fired...where are you going to find a fired bullet unexpanded enough to insert into another gun?

the bullet doesn't expand until it actually hits something.
i don't know enough about calibers to know if a .40 would fit into the barrel of a .38 though. was the .38 loaded with a round chambered? i'm wondering if the impact from the .40 would make the .38 round go off?


Read the link. It didn't go into the barrel, it went into one of the CHAMBERS of the revolver. It would be a tight squeeze for the round, but it would fit.
 

dxkj

Lifer
Feb 17, 2001
11,772
2
81
Does it matter? A suspect doesnt have to be pointing a gun at a policeman to be shot, if they are even holding a gun, they will probably get shot.... but I dont know the details of this instance, so it is hard to say who or what was justified.
 

antyler

Golden Member
Aug 7, 2005
1,745
0
0
Thats pretty far fetched but who knows. I wonder, wouldnt the bullet from his gun have nailed him if it was pushed backwards?
 

TGS

Golden Member
May 3, 2005
1,849
0
0
You can see where the round was impacted against the guard. Or the suspects rounds would fall out to begin with. :)
 

BooGiMaN

Diamond Member
Jul 5, 2001
7,955
0
0
i dont know but if they did this on purpose to plant evidence...who the hell would come up with this scenerio


its so outlandish hat i think ill believe it did happen...


so bob should we plant a gun and say he pointed it at us...

no lets fire a round into one of the chambers ..yeah thats it that is more believable!
 
Jan 31, 2002
40,819
2
0
Whee! Everyone on the cop-hating bandwagon! We're all going to sit around the campfire for a big circle-jerk later, so don't anyone think about falling off!

- M4H
 

Mo0o

Lifer
Jul 31, 2001
24,227
3
76
Well if the evidence was faked it'd be pretty obvious to tell I would think. ANd the cops would be pretty desperate to point two guns together and try to shoot one into the other on purpose just to plant soem evidence.
 

CrackRabbit

Lifer
Mar 30, 2001
16,642
62
91
If you look closely at the picture you can see where part of the cartridge in the side chamber is bent outwards from the impact.
Million to 1 shot.
 

NikPreviousAcct

No Lifer
Aug 15, 2000
52,763
1
0
Originally posted by: quakefiend420
fire it perfectly straight up with no crosswinds :laugh:

And do what, run around trying to catch it bare-handed when it falls back to earth? :p Even with out crosswinds, the earth still spins and a bullet fired straight up would still have to come back and be caught. They're not lethal on "re-entry" unless unreasonably extreme conditions are met, but it would still really f'in hurt to catch. It wouldn't penetrate the skull, but it would certainly still punch through flesh. It's not like you can put on your baseball glove and catch it or something :p
 

NikPreviousAcct

No Lifer
Aug 15, 2000
52,763
1
0
Originally posted by: CPA
Originally posted by: GreenGhost
Now with PICtures:

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/268168_shootingfollow27.html

I can't make out the damage they say is in the pic.

The chamber directly right (if you were holding the gun) shows the chambered round disfigured and pushed out the back of the chamber. Click zoom.

I don't think people are catching that "chamber" is not "barrel" and thinking the officer's round went down the barrel of the pistol. It didn't. It landed itself into one of the other chambered rounds that are clearly visible from the front or back of any wheel gun.
 

rhino56

Platinum Member
Oct 6, 2004
2,325
1
0
so why such crappy pics that barely show anything? could have been a backfire also that did that.
 

NikPreviousAcct

No Lifer
Aug 15, 2000
52,763
1
0
Originally posted by: rhino56
so why such crappy pics that barely show anything? could have been a backfire also that did that.

What would you prefer? A cross-section of the chamber and 2 rounds? Jesus, people will bitch about anything.

Backfire, though? Like a squib? A squib would have done far more damage. You'd see much more damage to things like firing pin (if it's not completely blown off the hammer). In the picture shown, the only damage visible is the casing sticking out the back of one of the side chambers.
 

Bobthelost

Diamond Member
Dec 1, 2005
4,360
0
0
The bullets have to go somewhere don't they? Also if you're pointing a pistol at someone then it's going to be at the right angle for the bullet to enter. It doesn't have to go down the barrel, just lodge partially or fully in a chamber.

It's improbable yes, but not impossible at first glance.
 

BuckNaked

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
4,211
0
76
The bullet is made up of softer material than the cylinder of the revolver... If the bullet were to hit the front of the chamber from the front, the bullet could easily swage itself into the opening of the cylinder as described, even in a situation like this when the round fired is a larger caliber than the weapon that was hit. I am sure you are not going to pull out an intact .40 round, but a portion of it, and fragments of it were deflected into the suspect or continued past him or off into another direction.

I also know from first hand experience in structured force on force training, that when someone presents a handgun in a threating manner with the intent to shoot, the weapon is pretty much inline with that persons center of mass (which is generally the portion of a target you are trained to shoot at in an encounter), and obscures a fair amount of it depending on the distance. I have been hit many times in the knuckles and hand (hurts like hell) when going through numerous training scenarios, and its not hard for me to picture something like this happening at all.
 
Jun 4, 2005
19,723
1
0
Originally posted by: ryan256
Originally posted by: fbrdphreak
Originally posted by: ryan256
Possability: 100%
Probability: 0.00000000001%
Possability?


Um yeah... OP's question was what do you think. Thats what I think.

Oh btw Bradruth. Remember a bullet doesn't mushroom til it hits something. Having not hit anything before entering the barrel of the other gun it could possably go in. Of course the angle & numerous other variables would have to be perfect. Hence the low probability.

Poss...possability?
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,333
136
Originally posted by: bradruth
Originally posted by: Vic
Seattle continues to break new ground in municipal corruption.
And that's illustrated how in this case?
The probabilities involved here are so remote as to be ludicrous and utterly unbelievable. It only strengthens Seattle's ongoing reputation as the most corrupt city government in the US.