Kusnierek
Member
First off, let me clarify that this is not a thread debating which I should get, because I have already purchased both. 😛 I'm just looking for advice on where I should use them. Here are their advertised specs:
Plextor M3 256GB SATA III (6.0Gb/s)
Max Sequential Read: Up to 510 MB/s
Max Sequential Write: Up to 360 MB/s
4KB Random Read: Up to 70,000 IOPS
4KB Random Write: Up to 65,000 IOPS
Power Consumption (Idle): 0.1W
Power Consumption (Active): 5W
Crucial M4 256GB SATA III (6.0Gb/s)
Sustained Sequential Read: Up to 500 MB/s (SATA 6Gb/s)
Sustained Sequential Write: Up to 260 MB/s (SATA 6Gb/s)
4KB Random Read: Up to 45,000 IOPS
4KB Random Write: Up to 50,000 IOPS
Power Consumption (Idle): < 85 mW
Power Consumption (Active): 0.16W
One of these drives is going into my desktop PC as my Windows boot drive, which has SATA 6.0Gb/s support. The other is going into my Late 2009 MacBook, which only has SATA 3.0Gb/s support. My instinct is to put the Crucial drive in the MacBook, since it has lower advertised performance, and therefore (by my reasoning) would suffer a lower decrease in speed by using it at SATA 3.0Gb/s speeds than the Plextor would. Also, unless this is a terrible mistake in Newegg's specifications, the Crucial drive uses way, way less power than the Plextor and would therefore be better suited for a battery environment. On the other hand, I don't know if there are firmware or other hardware issues that might make one drive more suited for one device or the other.
If anyone has any advice on the issue, I'm all ears. Err, eyeballs?
Plextor M3 256GB SATA III (6.0Gb/s)
Max Sequential Read: Up to 510 MB/s
Max Sequential Write: Up to 360 MB/s
4KB Random Read: Up to 70,000 IOPS
4KB Random Write: Up to 65,000 IOPS
Power Consumption (Idle): 0.1W
Power Consumption (Active): 5W
Crucial M4 256GB SATA III (6.0Gb/s)
Sustained Sequential Read: Up to 500 MB/s (SATA 6Gb/s)
Sustained Sequential Write: Up to 260 MB/s (SATA 6Gb/s)
4KB Random Read: Up to 45,000 IOPS
4KB Random Write: Up to 50,000 IOPS
Power Consumption (Idle): < 85 mW
Power Consumption (Active): 0.16W
One of these drives is going into my desktop PC as my Windows boot drive, which has SATA 6.0Gb/s support. The other is going into my Late 2009 MacBook, which only has SATA 3.0Gb/s support. My instinct is to put the Crucial drive in the MacBook, since it has lower advertised performance, and therefore (by my reasoning) would suffer a lower decrease in speed by using it at SATA 3.0Gb/s speeds than the Plextor would. Also, unless this is a terrible mistake in Newegg's specifications, the Crucial drive uses way, way less power than the Plextor and would therefore be better suited for a battery environment. On the other hand, I don't know if there are firmware or other hardware issues that might make one drive more suited for one device or the other.
If anyone has any advice on the issue, I'm all ears. Err, eyeballs?
Last edited: