Originally posted by: cheapherk
Anyone know anything about this? NGOHQ.com Article and Accusation
Originally posted by: cheapherk
Anyone know anything about this? NGOHQ.com Article and Accusation
Originally posted by: GTaudiophile
Forum Issues?
Originally posted by: sm8000
Wow. Well spoken, arcenite. More of us need to get in there and tell them what's what!
Originally posted by: azazyel
Originally posted by: sm8000
Wow. Well spoken, arcenite. More of us need to get in there and tell them what's what!
don't bother, it would be like feeding a troll.
Also, couldn't their statements be taken as libel and defamation of character??
Originally posted by: JEDIYoda
Originally posted by: azazyel
Originally posted by: sm8000
Wow. Well spoken, arcenite. More of us need to get in there and tell them what's what!
don't bother, it would be like feeding a troll.
Also, couldn't their statements be taken as libel and defamation of character??
No! They cannot be taken as libel and defamation of character.
Things like what the gentlerman stated happen all the time in thids buisness!!
Alot of similarities.....but thats all they are is similarities!
Originally posted by: azazyel
Originally posted by: JEDIYoda
Originally posted by: azazyel
Originally posted by: sm8000
Wow. Well spoken, arcenite. More of us need to get in there and tell them what's what!
don't bother, it would be like feeding a troll.
Also, couldn't their statements be taken as libel and defamation of character??
No! They cannot be taken as libel and defamation of character.
Things like what the gentlerman stated happen all the time in thids buisness!!
Alot of similarities.....but thats all they are is similarities!
The title itself is IMHO libel. "Plagiarism by Anandtech" They stated that Anandtech plagerised them and put it forth as a 'fact' in print. This can be seen as an attack against Anandtect's crebility.
"Libel' is the common term for 'defamation'. Defamation is the deliberate writing (libel) or speaking (slander) of untrue information about a person or corporation. Where the spreading of defamatory speech or material causes material damage to those it relates to they may seek legal redress for the damage caused."
Originally posted by: smack Down
Originally posted by: azazyel
Originally posted by: JEDIYoda
Originally posted by: azazyel
Originally posted by: sm8000
Wow. Well spoken, arcenite. More of us need to get in there and tell them what's what!
don't bother, it would be like feeding a troll.
Also, couldn't their statements be taken as libel and defamation of character??
No! They cannot be taken as libel and defamation of character.
Things like what the gentlerman stated happen all the time in thids buisness!!
Alot of similarities.....but thats all they are is similarities!
The title itself is IMHO libel. "Plagiarism by Anandtech" They stated that Anandtech plagerised them and put it forth as a 'fact' in print. This can be seen as an attack against Anandtect's crebility.
"Libel' is the common term for 'defamation'. Defamation is the deliberate writing (libel) or speaking (slander) of untrue information about a person or corporation. Where the spreading of defamatory speech or material causes material damage to those it relates to they may seek legal redress for the damage caused."
It can not be libel if the people saying it have a good faith belief that it is true. The truth is always a defense against libel. Plus anandtech beind a corportation gets less protection then your average bum on the street.
Originally posted by: smack Down
Originally posted by: azazyel
Originally posted by: JEDIYoda
Originally posted by: azazyel
Originally posted by: sm8000
Wow. Well spoken, arcenite. More of us need to get in there and tell them what's what!
don't bother, it would be like feeding a troll.
Also, couldn't their statements be taken as libel and defamation of character??
No! They cannot be taken as libel and defamation of character.
Things like what the gentlerman stated happen all the time in thids buisness!!
Alot of similarities.....but thats all they are is similarities!
The title itself is IMHO libel. "Plagiarism by Anandtech" They stated that Anandtech plagerised them and put it forth as a 'fact' in print. This can be seen as an attack against Anandtect's crebility.
"Libel' is the common term for 'defamation'. Defamation is the deliberate writing (libel) or speaking (slander) of untrue information about a person or corporation. Where the spreading of defamatory speech or material causes material damage to those it relates to they may seek legal redress for the damage caused."
It can not be libel if the people saying it have a good faith belief that it is true. The truth is always a defense against libel. Plus anandtech beind a corportation gets less protection then your average bum on the street.
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Holy crap, now the idiot says he is sueing Anandtech and Anandtech members.
What a turd. :|
Originally posted by: PatboyX
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Holy crap, now the idiot says he is sueing Anandtech and Anandtech members.
What a turd. :|
he also posted a screen shot of an anandtech article quote and a PM from a user who once sided with AT but now sides with them as proof (assumedly, the user is from AT)
anyway, this really seems like much ado about nothing but it may be in AT's best interest to post an "official statement"
