DivideBYZero
Lifer
- May 18, 2001
- 24,117
- 2
- 0
Originally posted by: Zenmervolt
Mustang GT 0-60 (Road & Track): 4.9 seconds
GTO 0-60 (Road & Track): 5.2 seconds
Camaro Z28 0-60 (Muscle Car Club): 5.5 seconds
Mustang GT 1/4 Mile (Road & Track): 13.5 seconds
GTO 1/4 Mile (Road & Track): 13.7 seconds
Camaro SS 1/4 Mile (Muscle Car Club): 14.0 seconds
ZV
Originally posted by: McGyver
Originally posted by: five40
I don't get the GTO. It looks totally like a Grand Am.
and i thought grand am is designed for non-white,non-asianpacific,non-hispanic people.
Originally posted by: AdamK47 3DS
Originally posted by: BD2003
Can we see your mullet?
Give me a few years to grow one. You just polish that fart can on your Civic in the meantime.
Originally posted by: BD2003
Originally posted by: AdamK47 3DS
Originally posted by: BD2003
Can we see your mullet?
Give me a few years to grow one. You just polish that fart can on your Civic in the meantime.
It *was* a fart can on a Dodge Neon. Get it straight.![]()
Originally posted by: joshsquall
They are very boring looking cars. My 06 Mustang GT is close in performance, but 10 times better looking.
Originally posted by: AdamK47 3DS
Originally posted by: joshsquall
They are very boring looking cars. My 06 Mustang GT is close in performance, but 10 times better looking.
It's subjective. I personally don't like a retro angular look. That angular look causes significant drag. The GTOs design has performance in mind. I also like the sleeper look of a GTO. The GTO is a true performance car appealing mainly to gearheads. The car was built for people like me in mind.
Ford sold over 134,000 Mustangs in 2005 alone. You see them all over the road everywhere. The GTO has a uniqueness that I'm proud to have.
Gearing and grip. IRS is not well suited to the drag strip. When the car squats, you get camber changes, which reduces grip during straight-line acceleration. The camber changes tend to help when cornering, but they hurt during a drag strip run. Also, location and day. It all just depends. As I said, the difference isn't big enough to guarantee either car a win. On a rolling start, the GTO would almost certainly win, but in a real drag race, it's a toss-up.Originally posted by: andylawcc
how come? one ONE HUNDRED MORE hp and it's still slower than the Mustang GT?Originally posted by: Zenmervolt
Mustang GT 0-60 (Road & Track): 4.9 seconds
GTO 0-60 (Road & Track): 5.2 seconds
Camaro Z28 0-60 (Muscle Car Club): 5.5 seconds
Mustang GT 1/4 Mile (Road & Track): 13.5 seconds
GTO 1/4 Mile (Road & Track): 13.7 seconds
Camaro SS 1/4 Mile (Muscle Car Club): 14.0 seconds
ZV
the Mustang weights only 300 lbs less.... that's just ten percent from GTO's 3700.
I agree with most of what you said, but the bolded parts are iffy. The sheer number of performance parts available for the Mustang would tend to go against your insinuation that the Mustang is not a car for gearheads. As far as being proud of the "uniqueness" of the GTO, it's fine to like the car because fewer of them have been sold, but unless you were part of the car's production or design, there's nothing for you to be personally proud of.Originally posted by: AdamK47 3DS
It's subjective. I personally don't like a retro angular look. That angular look causes significant drag. The GTOs design has performance in mind. I also like the sleeper look of a GTO. The GTO is a true performance car appealing mainly to gearheads. The car was built for people like me in mind.
Ford sold over 134,000 Mustangs in 2005 alone. You see them all over the road everywhere. The GTO has a uniqueness that I'm proud to have.
Originally posted by: MIKEMIKE
Originally posted by: five40
I don't get the GTO. It looks totally like a Grand Am.
and the Original looked JUST like the LeMans with a hood scope, few changes, and a big ass engine thrown in.
Originally posted by: Zenmervolt
I agree with most of what you said, but the bolded parts are iffy. The sheer number of performance parts available for the Mustang would tend to go against your insinuation that the Mustang is not a car for gearheads. As far as being proud of the "uniqueness" of the GTO, it's fine to like the car because fewer of them have been sold, but unless you were part of the car's production or design, there's nothing for you to be personally proud of.Originally posted by: AdamK47 3DS
It's subjective. I personally don't like a retro angular look. That angular look causes significant drag. The GTOs design has performance in mind. I also like the sleeper look of a GTO. The GTO is a true performance car appealing mainly to gearheads. The car was built for people like me in mind.
Ford sold over 134,000 Mustangs in 2005 alone. You see them all over the road everywhere. The GTO has a uniqueness that I'm proud to have.
ZV
Originally posted by: otispunkmeyer
Originally posted by: MIKEMIKE
Originally posted by: five40
I don't get the GTO. It looks totally like a Grand Am.
and the Original looked JUST like the LeMans with a hood scope, few changes, and a big ass engine thrown in.
its not like pontiac desgined it themselves is it?
its just a aussie holden monaro VXR with a pontiac badge
I'll concede that to an extent. Though buying a Mustang for "image" is not really any different at all from you being "proud" of the GTO.Originally posted by: AdamK47 3DS
I mention it's a car for a gearhead simply because there isn't a lower performance varient like the Mustang. People buy the Mustang for the image factor.
Originally posted by: MIKEMIKE
Originally posted by: AdamK47 3DS
I found this page interesting.
and they used all autos because?
*shrugs* Come out to Seattle and run on the next Pelican Parts drive and ask the Boxster driver himself.Originally posted by: Nebor
Whoever said their Mustang GT keeps up with a Porsche Boxster S in corners is dreaming. Must have been a Boxster driver that was afraid to drive. They also back 280hp, and are lighter than a Mustang GT, getting to 60mph in 5.2 seconds. That means they should be neck and neck on the straights.
On an overall road course though, the Boxster S will own.
