bryanW1995
Lifer
All that I see on the OP's hardware is a 2900 pro and 4 hd's. you can't count the case since it obviously isn't impacted by the psu. say he spent 285 on the 2900 pro. we have no way of knowing he has 4 raptor X's or 1tb drives, or if he has a 40 gb pata, 80gb pata, 120 gb sata, and a 500gb sata, or perhaps some mix and match combo in between. that hardly qualifies as "$1500 worth of hardware".Originally posted by: apoppin
Originally posted by: bryanW1995
he's not spending $1500 on top of the line merchandise, he's buying a 2900 pro because it's 2/3 the price of the 2900xt and gives nearly identical performance, the same reason that you and i were looking at them. I spent a lot of money on my system and I got a qualtiy psu. Same for you, and for many of us here for that matter. I also agree that in general it's not a good idea to go cheap on the psu. Antec makes decent psu's, however, and I think that it would be smarter for the OP to at least try the psu that he has before spending $75-$100 for a potentially needless upgrade.
he has $1,500 of HW at risk ... balance that risk with "a potentially needless upgrade" 😛
Now if he planned to keep that 2900Pro at stock it might be fine ... but if he wants XT performance he will draw XT current ... and good luck to him with a underpowered PS.
AMD recommends 550W for a 2900xt ... tell THEM they are wrong.
😕
Now, if we find out that he's running a Q6600 at 3.5 24/7 DC, has 4gb of ddr 3 and an asus striker extreme, I'm going to recommend that he get a psu like yours or at least an hx-series. On the other hand, if he's running a $45 skt 939 mobo with an x2 4200 and 2 gb pc 3200 "a couple of hours per day", then it's hard to justify the added expense of even the vx 450. In fact, he might be doing himself a favor by frying that mobo (or should I say moFO) 😉