Red Storm
Lifer
- Oct 2, 2005
- 14,233
- 234
- 106
A few points to clarify:
Jordan never won anything until Phil came into the picture. Same goes for Kobe. Moral of the story? You need a great coach just as much as you need great players to win it all.
People talk about Jordan as if he was perfect at the end of games. I think in the playoffs he's 9 out of 18 or around there in game winning or end of game shots, which is 50%. Bear in mind that 50% number is actually really good compared to the rest (I think Kobe is like ~30% in the playoffs), but there's this myth that Jordan never missed a late game shot and that's simply not true even though he is the best ever.
Another point to consider is that in Jordan's entire career, he hit 9 game winning shots in the playoffs. This lone scenario seems to be overvalued when people say it's the reason why he's the best when it only happened 9 times. His play throughout a game is what made him the best ever, not his 50% game winning make rate.
Jordan never won anything until Phil came into the picture. Same goes for Kobe. Moral of the story? You need a great coach just as much as you need great players to win it all.
People talk about Jordan as if he was perfect at the end of games. I think in the playoffs he's 9 out of 18 or around there in game winning or end of game shots, which is 50%. Bear in mind that 50% number is actually really good compared to the rest (I think Kobe is like ~30% in the playoffs), but there's this myth that Jordan never missed a late game shot and that's simply not true even though he is the best ever.
Another point to consider is that in Jordan's entire career, he hit 9 game winning shots in the playoffs. This lone scenario seems to be overvalued when people say it's the reason why he's the best when it only happened 9 times. His play throughout a game is what made him the best ever, not his 50% game winning make rate.
Last edited: