• We should now be fully online following an overnight outage. Apologies for any inconvenience, we do not expect there to be any further issues.

Personal "cost" of current proposal

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

SickBeast

Lifer
Jul 21, 2000
14,377
19
81
Originally posted by: Darwin333
Taxes must go up on just about everyone regardless.

Yes, but it might still work out to be a net gain for people who currently pay for insurance.
 

JD50

Lifer
Sep 4, 2005
11,918
2,883
136
Originally posted by: nobodyknows
Originally posted by: rchiu
Realistically, no single person have a clue what the real cost of the current proposal will be until after it is really implemented. If anyone tell you otherwise, the person is lying.

It comes down to trust and track record. Show me one goverment program that is run cost effectly and run well and I will put my trust in the government.

Health care is like defense. Cost isn't the big concern, getting things done right is.

Since you are speaking English and not German, Japanese, or Russian the goverment seem to have been running that "program" rather effectively??

:confused:

I thought one of the biggest problems with our current system is how much it's costing us?
 

Patranus

Diamond Member
Apr 15, 2007
9,280
0
0
Currently, only 83 cents on the dollar from medicare/medicaid is paid to hospitals. The rest is subsidized by those who have insurance. This pay schedule is slated to be instituted with HR3200.
Now, could it be the high cost of private insurance is because you are paying to make up that 17 cents? That could possibly be one factor.
 

rchiu

Diamond Member
Jun 8, 2002
3,846
0
0
Originally posted by: nobodyknows
Originally posted by: rchiu
Realistically, no single person have a clue what the real cost of the current proposal will be until after it is really implemented. If anyone tell you otherwise, the person is lying.

It comes down to trust and track record. Show me one goverment program that is run cost effectly and run well and I will put my trust in the government.

Health care is like defense. Cost isn't the big concern, getting things done right is.

Since you are speaking English and not German, Japanese, or Russian the goverment seem to have been running that "program" rather effectively??

Yeah, speak like a true citizen of the country with most debt in the world. Good luck to the US and tax payers when the government throws 10x of what every other countries spend on each and every programs. Hope you, your kids and grand kids have the money to pay it back or deal with any new attacks or natural disasters.
 

Fingolfin269

Lifer
Feb 28, 2003
17,948
34
91
Originally posted by: JD50
Originally posted by: nobodyknows
Originally posted by: rchiu
Realistically, no single person have a clue what the real cost of the current proposal will be until after it is really implemented. If anyone tell you otherwise, the person is lying.

It comes down to trust and track record. Show me one goverment program that is run cost effectly and run well and I will put my trust in the government.

Health care is like defense. Cost isn't the big concern, getting things done right is.

Since you are speaking English and not German, Japanese, or Russian the goverment seem to have been running that "program" rather effectively??

:confused:

I thought one of the biggest problems with our current system is how much it's costing us?

Lol I don't even know what to say. This is pretty sig worthy to be honest. :)
 

nobodyknows

Diamond Member
Sep 28, 2008
5,474
0
0
Originally posted by: JD50
Originally posted by: nobodyknows
Originally posted by: rchiu
Realistically, no single person have a clue what the real cost of the current proposal will be until after it is really implemented. If anyone tell you otherwise, the person is lying.

It comes down to trust and track record. Show me one goverment program that is run cost effectly and run well and I will put my trust in the government.

Health care is like defense. Cost isn't the big concern, getting things done right is.

Since you are speaking English and not German, Japanese, or Russian the goverment seem to have been running that "program" rather effectively??

:confused:

I thought one of the biggest problems with our current system is how much it's costing us?

Obviously cost only matters when we're talking about someone else's healthcare, not our own. I was speaking of our own health care and in that case cost isn't the big concern. Being fixed/cured is. ;)
 

nobodyknows

Diamond Member
Sep 28, 2008
5,474
0
0
Originally posted by: rchiu
Originally posted by: nobodyknows
Originally posted by: rchiu
Realistically, no single person have a clue what the real cost of the current proposal will be until after it is really implemented. If anyone tell you otherwise, the person is lying.

It comes down to trust and track record. Show me one goverment program that is run cost effectly and run well and I will put my trust in the government.

Health care is like defense. Cost isn't the big concern, getting things done right is.

Since you are speaking English and not German, Japanese, or Russian the goverment seem to have been running that "program" rather effectively??

Yeah, speak like a true citizen of the country with most debt in the world. Good luck to the US and tax payers when the government throws 10x of what every other countries spend on each and every programs. Hope you, your kids and grand kids have the money to pay it back or deal with any new attacks or natural disasters.

LOL, once we get the program in place we can cut costs on YOUR health care.

Seriously, when your sick do you really care what the costs are? To have a sane discussion on costs is next to impossible. Health care costs money. People have to be stupid to think it's not going to cost them anything. The idea is to get the best bang for your buck and we can't even start on that end of things until we get a plan in place that everyone agrees on.

In order to do that compromises will have to be made.... by everybody.
 

woodie1

Diamond Member
Mar 7, 2000
5,947
0
0
Originally posted by: shadow9d9
Originally posted by: DLeRium
Originally posted by: shadow9d9
It is amazing how legislation that will help americans has caused so many people on the internet to magically care about the "cost" yet no one cared for 8 years while the deficit doubled and all we got for it was 30,000+ injured, 5k dead, and 100,000 dead iraqis...

Dude what are you like 5?

Did you just say "dude" and then call someone 5?

What's the problem - I call my 2 yo grandson "Dude". But I'd put your age at around 9.
 

rchiu

Diamond Member
Jun 8, 2002
3,846
0
0
Originally posted by: nobodyknows

LOL, once we get the program in place we can cut costs on YOUR health care.

Seriously, when your sick do you really care what the costs are? To have a sane discussion on costs is next to impossible. Health care costs money. People have to be stupid to think it's not going to cost them anything. The idea is to get the best bang for your buck and we can't even start on that end of things until we get a plan in place that everyone agrees on.

In order to do that compromises will have to be made.... by everybody.

BS, let's see you back your claim up.

Do I really care what the costs are? Of course I do, you'd be stupid not to. Somebody is gonna pay for the cost, sooner or later. You'd be stupid to blindly let the healthcare cost to get out of control and eventually you and your country won't be able to afford a decent healthcare.

Oh and the reason why everyone don't agree on the plan is it's not gonna give you best bang for the buck. It's just more government beauracracy. And a few post up you were saying who cares about the cost.
 

Fingolfin269

Lifer
Feb 28, 2003
17,948
34
91
I guess this was a failed exercise. Oh well, I'm disappointed but not surprised. Perhaps it can be brought up again in another month...
 

Stuxnet

Diamond Member
Jun 16, 2005
8,392
1
0
Originally posted by: Fingolfin269
I guess this was a failed exercise. Oh well, I'm disappointed but not surprised. Perhaps it can be brought up again in another month...

The problem is that no one knows the costs yet. Remember, we're going to figure that out after we slam the bill through. But because we don't have any real information right now, we're going to argue against the necessity of said information:

Originally posted by: nobodyknows
Cost isn't the big concern, getting things done right is.

Cost AND quality matter... no, just cost... no wait... just quality... actually, you know what, we just need something - "change", if you will.
 

TheSkinsFan

Golden Member
May 15, 2009
1,141
0
0
Why haven't any numbers or standards been disclosed?
fixed.

And the answer is simple: They haven't bothered to work out those numbers and standards yet -- per the House proposal, each of those will be at the whim of "The Secretary" or "The Commissioner" sometime in the future AFTER the bill is passed.

fun, huh?
 

StageLeft

No Lifer
Sep 29, 2000
70,150
5
0
Originally posted by: sandorski
Originally posted by: CPA
Well, based on the current CARS funding fiasco (went from $1B to $3B due to poor fiscal management), whatever the feds tell you triple it.

damn, that's some quality BS right there.
Ok, another example. Iraq was going to cost $60B.

It's true, government programs very consistently and predictably blow the hell out of their budget.
It is amazing how legislation that will help americans has caused so many people on the internet to magically care about the "cost" yet no one cared for 8 years while the deficit doubled and all we got for it was 30,000+ injured, 5k dead, and 100,000 dead iraqis...
Great job, every time somebody criticizes a democrat plan, steer things back to Bush & Iraq, fvcking superb!
 

Stuxnet

Diamond Member
Jun 16, 2005
8,392
1
0
Originally posted by: TheSkinsFan
each of those will be at the whim of "The Secretary" or "The Commissioner" sometime in the future AFTER the bill is passed.

They call this "tweaking" the plan ;)
 

Darwin333

Lifer
Dec 11, 2006
19,946
2,329
126
Originally posted by: SickBeast
Originally posted by: Darwin333
Taxes must go up on just about everyone regardless.

Yes, but it might still work out to be a net gain for people who currently pay for insurance.

I highly doubt it. All they are doing right now is playing kick the can just like the last guys (and the ones before that) did. The problem is the can is getting real heavy and its soon going to be to heavy to kick. Then we will be forced to take our medicine and the pain will be much worse.

Can it be prevented? Sure it can but its not politically feasible as it means dramatically higher taxes as well as huge reductions in spending across the board, so I have absolutely no faith that it will be fixed until our creditors force us.

 

waggy

No Lifer
Dec 14, 2000
68,143
10
81
Originally posted by: Fingolfin269
And like I said I'm for reform. I agree with those who say a complete overhaul of the system would probably net out in overall savings while offering preventative care for all. However, my fear is a bill that is obviously a half ass attempt to do... Something, because anything iis better than nothing.
Until someone can lay out how much this is going to cost per tax bracket, whether you are employee insured or not, I will continue to be against it.

pretty much how i feel. this is a half assed rushed bill. I am all for UHC but the speed and secrecy they is keeping me from agreeing with it.

 

nobodyknows

Diamond Member
Sep 28, 2008
5,474
0
0
Originally posted by: rchiu
Originally posted by: nobodyknows

LOL, once we get the program in place we can cut costs on YOUR health care.

Seriously, when your sick do you really care what the costs are? To have a sane discussion on costs is next to impossible. Health care costs money. People have to be stupid to think it's not going to cost them anything. The idea is to get the best bang for your buck and we can't even start on that end of things until we get a plan in place that everyone agrees on.

In order to do that compromises will have to be made.... by everybody.

BS, let's see you back your claim up.

Do I really care what the costs are? Of course I do, you'd be stupid not to. Somebody is gonna pay for the cost, sooner or later. You'd be stupid to blindly let the healthcare cost to get out of control and eventually you and your country won't be able to afford a decent healthcare.

Oh and the reason why everyone don't agree on the plan is it's not gonna give you best bang for the buck. It's just more government beauracracy. And a few post up you were saying who cares about the cost.

When they have 6 doctors in your room trying to figure out why your heart keeps skipping beats are you going to stop them and ask them how much it's going to cost?

Of course you're not. Whatever tests the doctors want done, your going to want done and you'll worry about the cost later.
 

nobodyknows

Diamond Member
Sep 28, 2008
5,474
0
0
Originally posted by: jbourne77
Originally posted by: nobodyknows
Health care is like defense. Cost isn't the big concern, getting things done right is.

What. The. !@#$.

Cat got your tongue? Or maybe it's too big of an analogy to fit in such a small head?
 

Fingolfin269

Lifer
Feb 28, 2003
17,948
34
91
Originally posted by: nobodyknows
Originally posted by: jbourne77
Originally posted by: nobodyknows
Health care is like defense. Cost isn't the big concern, getting things done right is.

What. The. !@#$.

Cat got your tongue? Or maybe it's too big of an analogy to fit in such a small head?

It's just a bad analogy. Just because we're doing one thing that costs a lot doesn't mean we should go spend a bunch of money somewhere else. Balance the budget. Live within our means. Reform responsibly and OPENLY.
 

nobodyknows

Diamond Member
Sep 28, 2008
5,474
0
0
Originally posted by: Fingolfin269
Originally posted by: nobodyknows
Originally posted by: jbourne77
Originally posted by: nobodyknows
Health care is like defense. Cost isn't the big concern, getting things done right is.

What. The. !@#$.

Cat got your tongue? Or maybe it's too big of an analogy to fit in such a small head?

It's just a bad analogy. Just because we're doing one thing that costs a lot doesn't mean we should go spend a bunch of money somewhere else. Balance the budget. Live within our means. Reform responsibly and OPENLY.

Well since the goverment is so fucked up it can't even run a wheelbarrow why are we letting them be in charge of our defense?? My God, look at all those socialist Generals ruining this fine country with the pet pork barrel projects!!!
 

heyheybooboo

Diamond Member
Jun 29, 2007
6,278
0
0
If you combine "public option," "self-funded" and "single-payer" I imagine your personal "cost" of private insurance will go down.

Food for thought: With another double-digit increase in the cost of health care this year (as typical) and the decline in economic output anticipated over 2009 ....

Over 19% of GDP will be health care related.

 

Athena

Golden Member
Apr 9, 2001
1,484
0
0
Originally posted by: Fingolfin269
This does nothing but dance around my specific question. Try again.
It was a response to nobodyknows about the difficulty individuals face when they try to find out the cost of anything associated with healthcare.

To address your point though, I certainly haven't seen anything I'd consider an answer. As with everything associated with health reform, there are a lot of dependencies when calculating costs and savings. The Economix has published a few columns though about the cost of reform and why it's so inexact:

The cost of Health Reform

Challenge to Health Bill: Selling Reform I gather that you would agree with Leonhardt's closing:

In recent weeks, polls have shown that a solid majority of Americans support the stated goals of health reform. Most want the uninsured to be covered and want the option of a government-run insurance plan. Yet the polls also show that people are worried about the package emerging from Congress.

Maybe they have a point.


More on Paying for Health Reform
 

Fingolfin269

Lifer
Feb 28, 2003
17,948
34
91
Originally posted by: nobodyknows
Originally posted by: Fingolfin269
Originally posted by: nobodyknows
Originally posted by: jbourne77
Originally posted by: nobodyknows
Health care is like defense. Cost isn't the big concern, getting things done right is.

What. The. !@#$.

Cat got your tongue? Or maybe it's too big of an analogy to fit in such a small head?

It's just a bad analogy. Just because we're doing one thing that costs a lot doesn't mean we should go spend a bunch of money somewhere else. Balance the budget. Live within our means. Reform responsibly and OPENLY.

Well since the goverment is so fucked up it can't even run a wheelbarrow why are we letting them be in charge of our defense?? My God, look at all those socialist Generals ruining this fine country with the pet pork barrel projects!!!

I agree with you. We need to attack our wasteful spending at ALL levels in ALL programs from defense to school lunches. However, the topic of the day is health care. It does no good for anyone pointing fingers at other programs, other people , etc. We need to point fingers at all of the people on the Hill and demand they provide us with the details we all deserve.