• We should now be fully online following an overnight outage. Apologies for any inconvenience, we do not expect there to be any further issues.

performance of intel extreme graphics card

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Soulkeeper

Diamond Member
Nov 23, 2001
6,736
156
106
I don't think they have T&L
the nvidia original nforce solutions were atleast 50% faster
they had nforce1 systems side by side to i845g systems once at an AMD event i went to
when those two were the fastest thing on both sides

they had like 4 different games running on these systems to compare
and the i845 system just couldn't seem to handle any 3d graphics from my perspective
it should be great for 2d and maybe you can play games that are older (unreal tournament, Quake3, half life) those should run atleast playable

but don't count on running BF1942, ut2003, ut2004, doom3, half life2, or any of those things

good luck
 

nick1985

Lifer
Dec 29, 2002
27,153
6
81
Originally posted by: BFG10K
Onboard graphics blow for 3D gaming regardless of who makes them.

nforce 2 IGP with dual channel ram is leagues ahead of the rest. but i agree, any real gamer would not get integrated
 

BFG10K

Lifer
Aug 14, 2000
22,709
3,003
126
Ahead of the rest of the onboard solutions, which doesn't really say much.
 
Jan 31, 2002
40,819
2
0
For those who are wondering, we managed to run UT2K4 on an i845-powered Celeron 2.0 laptop last night at a LAN.

640x480@16bpp, windowed, all details bottomed out = 30fps. :confused:

No screenie, sorry. But trust me - it was ugly.

- M4H
 

nick1985

Lifer
Dec 29, 2002
27,153
6
81
Originally posted by: MercenaryForHire
For those who are wondering, we managed to run UT2K4 on an i845-powered Celeron 2.0 laptop last night at a LAN.

640x480@16bpp, windowed, all details bottomed out = 30fps. :confused:

No screenie, sorry. But trust me - it was ugly.

- M4H

BARF!!!!!
 
Jan 31, 2002
40,819
2
0
Originally posted by: nick1985
Originally posted by: MercenaryForHire
For those who are wondering, we managed to run UT2K4 on an i845-powered Celeron 2.0 laptop last night at a LAN.

640x480@16bpp, windowed, all details bottomed out = 30fps. :confused:

No screenie, sorry. But trust me - it was ugly.

- M4H

BARF!!!!!

Actually, the guy who tried to play on it got motion-sick after about three minutes. :confused:

It made a great dedicated server though. UT2K4 WebAdmin utterly rocks. :D

- M4H
 

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,785
6,345
126
Originally posted by: Acanthus
I doubt you can even load UT2004 on IEG let alone actually get playable frames.

Tim Sweeney recently commented on Intel's Video dominance recently. He lamented the fact that he and the Unreal crew had to use DirectX 7 level Graphics in order to deal with Intel's dominant position in Video. ATI and Nvidia have been producing some very nice integrated Video, unfortunetly systems makers have not adopted them very eagerly.
 

SneakyStuff

Diamond Member
Jan 13, 2004
4,294
0
76
That is pretty sad, that game developers need to dumb down their games, just because Intel makes a bad product.