• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

People Get Fired As Racially Charged Facebook Remarks Mocking a Black Child Go Viral

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Blue_Max said:
So all the super-liberals can hug each other and throw their collective hatred and punishment at what they consider to be 'evil racists'.

AND pat each other on the head for being 'good people' for doing so. (Right up to calling the kid 'cute' even though you can't even see his face in the pic.)

This group may as well be called "We're so Wonderfuls"


Bad jokes aren't allowed anymore, folks. Get your NewSpeak dictionaries out.
Click to expand...

This specific picture cut out his face, the pic that was his profile pic did not. Many other articles showed the unaltered pic. I read about this in a couple of articles yesterday that showed this full picture and several other of him with his mother and grandmother. He qualifies as a cute kid.

I will give you kudos though in that this might be the first time I've seen you post in which you don't attack women.
 
Racism exists in this country and everybody knows this...just not sure why an anecdotal story such as this is worthy of a thread....except possibly to remind us that racism does indeed exist...on the outside chance we may have forgot? I'm trying to understand the OP's intent here.
 
Last edited:
Blue_Max said:
So all the super-liberals can hug each other and throw their collective hatred and punishment at what they consider to be 'evil racists'.

AND pat each other on the head for being 'good people' for doing so. (Right up to calling the kid 'cute' even though you can't even see his face in the pic.)

This group may as well be called "We're so Wonderfuls"


Bad jokes aren't allowed anymore, folks. Get your NewSpeak dictionaries out.
Click to expand...

You have freedom of speech. You don't have freedom from consequences.
 
thraashman said:
This specific picture cut out his face, the pic that was his profile pic did not. Many other articles showed the unaltered pic. I read about this in a couple of articles yesterday that showed this full picture and several other of him with his mother and grandmother. He qualifies as a cute kid.
Click to expand...

How many "articles" need to be dedicated to this crap before you feel good about yourselves? Jeez... talk about a rage-storm.

I will give you kudos though in that this might be the first time I've seen you post in which you don't attack women.
Click to expand...

Again, one can criticize the absurdity of 3rd-wave feminism without 'attacking women'. I've said this ad-nauseum but it never sinks in because your doctrine won't allow it.

In fact, it reminds me of EXACTLY what feminists in yet-another-campus-demonstration did on camera... The chants immediately went from "feminism under attack, what do we do?!" ...to... "WOMEN under attack, what do we do?!"

Deliberate misrepresentation to incite anger and call group violence upon your opponent.
 
jackstar7 said:
You have freedom of speech. You don't have freedom from consequences.
Click to expand...

Your side has been repeating this line a LOT lately. Interesting.

Also interesting is that it ONLY applies to those who oppose your GroupThink. YOUR side can say anything it darn well likes because it considers itself 'righteous'. Much like:
I feel that ‘man-hating’ is an honorable and viable political act, that the oppressed have a right to class-hatred against the class that is oppressing them. Robin Morgan, Ms. Magazine Editor

What a pity if the racism, sexism, or "oppression" isn't real?
 
Blue_Max said:
Your side has been repeating this line a LOT lately. Interesting.
Click to expand...

Your "side" repeats it all the time as "Common Sense".

Funny how it is controversial when idiots are punished. Holy shit... Moonie is right! You don't have any self-esteem and so you side with the idiots. That's terrible. Hugs, guys.
 
jackstar7 said:
Your "side" repeats it all the time as "Common Sense".

Funny how it is controversial when idiots are punished. Holy shit... Moonie is right! You don't have any self-esteem and so you side with the idiots. That's terrible. Hugs, guys.
Click to expand...
So much BS in such a short post...

1. The only group I see repeating this line is the super-liberal SJW-type crowds.

2. This is somewhat 'controversial' because people are getting fired over private comments. There's a lot of issues involved in that - the power SJW's have in dictating society, how much someone should be punished over a terrible joke, what limits should there be, who gets to determine those 'limits', etc. It would seem the super-lib-SJW crowd has it in their heads they ARE the governing power and THEY get to determine these things, no discussion allowed. That's a serious problem.

3. If I had no self esteem (as you put it) wouldn't I take the path of least resistance and just join the SJW crowd?

4. "Idiots" -- noun. A term used to describe people with opinions other than your own.
 
Blue_Max said:
So much BS in such a short post...

1. The only group I see repeating this line is the super-liberal SJW-type crowds.

2. This is somewhat 'controversial' because people are getting fired over private comments. There's a lot of issues involved in that - the power SJW's have in dictating society, how much someone should be punished over a terrible joke, what limits should there be, who gets to determine those 'limits', etc. It would seem the super-lib-SJW crowd has it in their heads they ARE the governing power and THEY get to determine these things, no discussion allowed. That's a serious problem.

3. If I had no self esteem (as you put it) wouldn't I take the path of least resistance and just join the SJW crowd?

4. "Idiots" -- noun. A term used to describe people with opinions other than your own.
Click to expand...

Got it. You're little sphere is tiny and cool with racists.
 
jackstar7 said:
Got it. You're little sphere is tiny and cool with racists.
Click to expand...

*sigh* No.
tumblr_llvmg60Zid1qz50wvo1_400.jpg


....gawwwwd.
 
Last edited:
I see some familiar name tags at the racist apologists convention:

Welcome Mr. But But
Hello Mr. What If
Please to meet you Mr. BadJokes R. Okay

Points and laughs...
 
ITT: dumbasses trying to make an excuse for the fired dumbasses by claiming Facebook/social media is "private". Pure gold.
 
Blue_Max said:
So much BS in such a short post...

1. The only group I see repeating this line is the super-liberal SJW-type crowds.

2. This is somewhat 'controversial' because people are getting fired over private comments. There's a lot of issues involved in that - the power SJW's have in dictating society, how much someone should be punished over a terrible joke, what limits should there be, who gets to determine those 'limits', etc. It would seem the super-lib-SJW crowd has it in their heads they ARE the governing power and THEY get to determine these things, no discussion allowed. That's a serious problem.

3. If I had no self esteem (as you put it) wouldn't I take the path of least resistance and just join the SJW crowd?

4. "Idiots" -- noun. A term used to describe people with opinions other than your own.
Click to expand...

Being a SJW is calling out someone for saying racist comments about a child? That term is really being stretched then. How about being a decent human?
 
The best thing to do is not have a social media account. I like my privacy why do people like to put themselves out in public like that never made sense to me.
 
Subyman said:
Being a SJW is calling out someone for saying racist comments about a child? That term is really being stretched then. How about being a decent human?
Click to expand...

I'm not saying it was a good joke, but don't you think the bloodthirsty mobs of torch n' pitchfork wavers is an over-reaction?

What we're seeing is totalitarianism. "Thou shalt not offend, no matter how slight, any of those in the progressive stack."
 
Meghan54 said:
I think the disagreement, if you call it that, was your "point" that the kid, being a co-worker's kid, made a difference. It doesn't and shouldn't.
Click to expand...

Sure it does. If he took a selfie while shopping at Walmart and some random kid was running around wild, calling the kid "feral" would probably go over a lot better.
 
...but racism is over, guys.

Also not surprised that some P&N members are coming to his defense. Stupid SJWs! Maybe he is just a rich kid that doesn't know any better. Duhhhh, calling a kid feral isn't racist! Especially when its used after a slew of racially charged comments about black people!

Blue_Max said:
Bad jokes aren't allowed anymore, folks. Get your NewSpeak dictionaries out.
Click to expand...

Attacking a 3 year old with racial comments is just "bad jokes".

giphy.gif
 
Last edited:
He knew exactly what kind of comments he was responding to. Making the argument that his "He was Feral" comment was harmless is fucking stupid. Given the context, his comment certainly was racially charged and he's just trying to pretend like he couldn't read the comments on his own post.

He's an idiot and so are the P&N posters trying to defend the guy.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top