I was wondering if I could get some of your opinions on a question that I have which I
am unsure of, I have two Toshibha notebooks which I would like to put to use appropriately based on performance :
1) 490XCDT : PII 266Mhz, 160MB RAM.
2) 4090XDVD : Celeron 400Mhz, 64MB RAM.
(L1 cache :32kb, L2 cache:128KB on cpu)
Although there is a obvious difference in the
Proccessor speed based on the numbers mentioned above,
knowing that Celeron is ranked lower than the Pentium
class how would you compare the two based on overall
performance ?
PII with relatively low proccessor speed (266) with
higher memory (160 RAM)
VERSUS
Celeron with relatively high proccessor speed(400mhz)
with lower memory (64mb ram).
am unsure of, I have two Toshibha notebooks which I would like to put to use appropriately based on performance :
1) 490XCDT : PII 266Mhz, 160MB RAM.
2) 4090XDVD : Celeron 400Mhz, 64MB RAM.
(L1 cache :32kb, L2 cache:128KB on cpu)
Although there is a obvious difference in the
Proccessor speed based on the numbers mentioned above,
knowing that Celeron is ranked lower than the Pentium
class how would you compare the two based on overall
performance ?
PII with relatively low proccessor speed (266) with
higher memory (160 RAM)
VERSUS
Celeron with relatively high proccessor speed(400mhz)
with lower memory (64mb ram).