• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Pentagon investigates Kerry's war medals

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Oh, and by the way, Democrats in power are somehow able to interpret what you cannot, conjur:

Senator Christopher J. Dodd, an influential Democrat from Connecticut, said his party's standard-bearer had "a very confused message in August, and the Republicans had a very clear and concise one."

Mr. Dodd was one of several Democrats who said they now thought Mr. Kerry had made a mistake at his convention in July by talking mainly about his history as a Vietnam War veteran and criticizing Mr. Bush's policies, without offering a vision of what a Kerry term would be like.

"We did not adequately lay out the contrast, compare and contrast what a Kerry administration would do and what the Bush administration has done," Mr. Dodd said of the Democrats' convention in Boston. "That was a mistake. Vietnam, in terms of John Kerry's service, that was a good point to make, but making it such a central point sort of invited the kind of response you've seen".
New York Times
 
I'm not surprised. This is just that final tap on the lid of the casket holding Kerry's run for the Whitehouse.
I've gotta agree with Dodd too. The Democrats are either inept campaigners or wanted to lose this race.
 
More from the Boston Globe:

[Hat tip: Ed Morrisey]

Kerry has made Vietnam far more central to his presidential campaign than in his previous seven political races. Yet interviews with aides, friends, and fellow veterans of Kerry show that his decisions to showcase his war past in the White House bid was far from automatic. As with Brinkley's book, one constant danger always loomed: Talking about his combat heroism inevitably invited talk about his antiwar activism after returning home, most notably his 1971 statement to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee that some US soldiers had committed rape, torture, mutilation, and other "atrocities" in Vietnam.

Even Kerry's biographer, Douglas Brinkley, acknowledges the emphasis on military service. From the same article:

Whether this counterassault will put Vietnam squarely back in the win column for the Kerry campaign will become clear in the next eight weeks. Democrats, including advisers to Kerry, remain wary and uncertain, just as the candidate once was about telling his Vietnam story. "Kerry decided to make Vietnam the centerpiece of his campaign for one clear reason: Imagine him without his military record -- he would just be another liberal from Taxachusetts," Brinkley said. "With Vietnam, he could challenge Republicans on their strongest position -- standing with the military and with the American flag. Now you're seeing the negative effects of that."
 
I still haven't heard any mainstream American press dealing with this investigation by the Pentagon. Anyone have a link? Specifically regarding this pentagon investigation?
 
I don't know about anyone else here, but I want the TRUTH. I don't care about politics or any of that other crap. I want to know the TRUTH. This is the way to get the truth. If Kerry wants to announce everywhere that he is a war hero, and there are some doubts, then let's find out who is right and who is wrong ONCE AND FOR ALL! Kerry started the whole military service part of his campaign, and if he really is the man he claims to be, then he and liberals have nothing to worry about. When voting for who will be the President of this country, I want all the FACTS. Well, lets get the facts.
 
Originally posted by: XZeroII
I don't know about anyone else here, but I want the TRUTH. I don't care about politics or any of that other crap. I want to know the TRUTH. This is the way to get the truth. If Kerry wants to announce everywhere that he is a war hero, and there are some doubts, then let's find out who is right and who is wrong ONCE AND FOR ALL! Kerry started the whole military service part of his campaign, and if he really is the man he claims to be, then he and liberals have nothing to worry about. When voting for who will be the President of this country, I want all the FACTS. Well, lets get the facts.

I hope you feel the same way about Bush's service and the missing files.

The problem with the Kerry stuff is the military decided to give him medals. Now they must have done SOME investigation at first. Now people are going over it NOW? So far there hasn't been any sufficient evidence to suggest this warrants re-investigation. If you are going to give credence to Bush's dishonorable discharge, give Kerry's records the same respect.
 
Originally posted by: XZeroII
I don't know about anyone else here, but I want the TRUTH. I don't care about politics or any of that other crap. I want to know the TRUTH. This is the way to get the truth. If Kerry wants to announce everywhere that he is a war hero, and there are some doubts, then let's find out who is right and who is wrong ONCE AND FOR ALL! Kerry started the whole military service part of his campaign, and if he really is the man he claims to be, then he and liberals have nothing to worry about. When voting for who will be the President of this country, I want all the FACTS. Well, lets get the facts.

Why? Because you want answers? Do you honestly think that Bush does not have a team of people trying to dig sh!t up on Kerry? Do you honestly think that if there was any credible evidence that Kerry has exagerated his war record the Bush team would not have pressed the issue. GMAFB.

That's what the SBVT are for. Camp Bush knows there is no way to discredit Kerry so having a third party cast doubts was the next best solution. And uh, it worked and is continuing to work. Well done.

 
agreed, I think all of America has heard enough about Vietnam and Purple Hearts. Let's talk foreign policy for christ sakes, seems like no candidate wants to discuss this issue at length or in depth.
 
Originally posted by: umbrella39
Do you honestly think that Bush does not have a team of people trying to dig sh!t up on Kerry?
Do you honestly think that Kerry doesn't have a team of people trying to dig sh!t up on Bush?
Originally posted by: umbrella39
Do you honestly think that if there was any credible evidence that Kerry has exagerated his war record the Bush team would not have pressed the issue. GMAFB.
Do you really think the fact that Kerry continues to campaign on a questionable War record has nothing to do with the scrutiny being leveled at him? He's carrying his own flippin' magnifying glass for goodness sake! Even his own party is telling him to put the damn thing down. If that's an indication of how a Kerry Presidency would run... go ahead; give me a reason to believe it'd be different. He asserts the US needs to "get along' with UN entities. The guy can't even get along with his own campaign staff...
Originally posted by: umbrella39
Camp Bush knows there is no way to discredit Kerry so having a third party cast doubts was the next best solution.
Move on.
Movon.org that is. Oh, I know, some of you libs don't agree with movon and some of the fringe efforts and you can't control what they say and, and, and... But hey, no harm no foul right? And if they happened to put some media out there that actually stuck against Bush it'd be more than just "casting doubt" now wouldn't it? Now really, with Camp Kerry counting on historical media bias and the "Anybody but Bush" crowd literally doing Anybody to beat Bush, don't you think that the one who is standing up to scrutiny here is Bush and not Kerry? Of course you don't. But then, you probably believe the Democrat spun hype the media brings to the love fest. Don't look now, every major media outlet is climbing over each other in a hasty attempt to distance themselves from the snafu that is Camp Kerry.


A: Damn, we can't win this argument, let's campaign on something else
B: We can't. He won't stop mentioning Vietnam.
A: Replace his staff then. Mabye he'll listen to our heavy hitters.
B: Not likely, it looks like he really believes his own war stories.
A: Who gives a f*ck about his war record, we're taking on water and I for one am not going down with the ship!
B: You know, it's going to look bad if we distance ourselves from our nominee.
A: Better for us to look disorganized than disingenuous.
B: When the hell did we start using that word!?


 
Originally posted by: Sketcher
Originally posted by: umbrella39
Do you honestly think that Bush does not have a team of people trying to dig sh!t up on Kerry?
Do you honestly think that Kerry doesn't have a team of people trying to dig sh!t up on Bush?

Do you honestly think that Bush does not have a team of people trying to dig sh!t up on Kerry?
 
Originally posted by: Infohawk
Originally posted by: Sketcher
Originally posted by: umbrella39
Do you honestly think that Bush does not have a team of people trying to dig sh!t up on Kerry?
Do you honestly think that Kerry doesn't have a team of people trying to dig sh!t up on Bush?

Do you honestly think that Bush does not have a team of people trying to dig sh!t up on Kerry?
And your question is? Damn right Bush has a team dedicated to digging in Kerry's dirt. The playground is mutually accessible and both parties since the beginning of presidential campaigns have endeavored to make the best use of their archeological tools. My rhetorical question as stated points out that those who are crying about unfair tactics are using dark colored cookware and pretending they're not. The Pot calling the Kettle Black, so to speak.
 
Originally posted by: Infohawk
Originally posted by: XZeroII
I don't know about anyone else here, but I want the TRUTH. I don't care about politics or any of that other crap. I want to know the TRUTH. This is the way to get the truth. If Kerry wants to announce everywhere that he is a war hero, and there are some doubts, then let's find out who is right and who is wrong ONCE AND FOR ALL! Kerry started the whole military service part of his campaign, and if he really is the man he claims to be, then he and liberals have nothing to worry about. When voting for who will be the President of this country, I want all the FACTS. Well, lets get the facts.

I hope you feel the same way about Bush's service and the missing files.

The problem with the Kerry stuff is the military decided to give him medals. Now they must have done SOME investigation at first. Now people are going over it NOW? So far there hasn't been any sufficient evidence to suggest this warrants re-investigation. If you are going to give credence to Bush's dishonorable discharge, give Kerry's records the same respect.

Bush is not touting his military service (or lack thereof). He is not using it to persuade people people to vote for him, and Kerry is not using it against him. There is no reason to find out the truth because it will not make a difference. However, Kerry is persuading people to vote for him because he is a military hero. If this is not true, I think the people had better know before they vote.

Yes, if Bush were making claims about himself that could be questionable, then by all means they should be investigated fully so the people know the truth.
 
Originally posted by: umbrella39
Originally posted by: XZeroII
I don't know about anyone else here, but I want the TRUTH. I don't care about politics or any of that other crap. I want to know the TRUTH. This is the way to get the truth. If Kerry wants to announce everywhere that he is a war hero, and there are some doubts, then let's find out who is right and who is wrong ONCE AND FOR ALL! Kerry started the whole military service part of his campaign, and if he really is the man he claims to be, then he and liberals have nothing to worry about. When voting for who will be the President of this country, I want all the FACTS. Well, lets get the facts.

Why? Because you want answers?
I think the people deserve the facts when they vote.

Do you honestly think that Bush does not have a team of people trying to dig sh!t up on Kerry? Do you honestly think that if there was any credible evidence that Kerry has exagerated his war record the Bush team would not have pressed the issue. GMAFB.
What do you think they are doing now? Besides, the Bush campign doesn't have access to all war records. They do not have the means to do a proper investigation. The pentagon does.

That's what the SBVT are for. Camp Bush knows there is no way to discredit Kerry so having a third party cast doubts was the next best solution. And uh, it worked and is continuing to work. Well done.
What evidence do you have that SBFV are lying other than the fact that Kerry says they are? Why should you believe that evidence over SBFV? You are taking one group's word over another without reason other than the fact that one group supports what you already believe. There is no rational reason to believe one side over the other based on the evidence currently presented. That is why the Navy is doing more research, hoping to put the issue to rest.

So what do you want? More petty bickering, or the truth?
 
Originally posted by: Sketcher
Originally posted by: raildogg
This is so sad, the Pentagon should have better things to do than this. Shameful.
And if Dubya had skeletons that the Dems were interested in dusting off and the Pentagon acted indifferently the way you guys are saying they should what then? I imagine that would be shameful too.

No wonder Kerry thinks he can have everything both ways...

Dubya has plenty of "skeletons", which we've all heard through the years.

What really seems whacked here is how 9/11 and other issues get delayed until Public pressure forces Investigations, but as soon as a Political Opponent gets accussed by a known group of accusers who can't keep their stories straight, BAM Investigation Time.

It stinks to high heaven and makes me think that the next Democratic President will endure another Clinton Witchhunt.
 
Kerry Should Remove Silver Star Pending Review


Original Request for Investigation



Dishonorable Commissioned Service:



According to publicly available records, Senator Kerry was released from Active Duty and transferred to the Naval Reserve (inactive) on 3 January 1970. On 1 July 1972 he was transferred to the Standby Reserve (inactive). While a commissioned officer in the inactive Naval Reserve, Senator Kerry traveled to Paris, France and met with official delegations from the Democratic Republic of Vietnam (North Vietnam) and the Provisional Revolutionary Government (the Viet Cong). The Vietnamese Communists eagerly met Senator Kerry and benefited directly from the obvious propaganda victory (See Exhibit 2, page 126 ? 129).



These acts are clear violations of the legal prohibitions on individual citizens negotiating with foreign powers (18 U.S.C. ' 953) and the constitutional prohibition against giving support to our nation?s enemies in wartime (Article III, Section 3). Additionally, as a commissioned officer of the Naval Reserve, Senator Kerry was subject to the UCMJ, and likely violated Article 104 (?Aiding the Enemy?) through his actions with the North Vietnamese/Viet Cong delegation.



Senator Kerry returned from his private negotiations with the Vietnamese Communists to Washington, DC and held a press conference. At that press event, Senator Kerry advocated a Vietnamese Communist ?peace proposal? calling for a U.S. withdrawal from Vietnam and payment of war damage reparations to the Communist government. Senator Kerry engaged in this advocacy on behalf of a foreign power with who we were at war while continuing to hold a commission as an officer in the U.S. Naval Reserve.



A detailed treatment of Senator Kerry?s dishonorable service during the period from 3 January 1970 through 16 February 1978, when he was incorrectly granted an ?Honorable Discharge,? can be found in Exhibit 2, Chapters 6 ? 10, pages 99 ? 185.

 
Originally posted by: Ozoned
Kerry Should Remove Silver Star Pending Review


Original Request for Investigation



Dishonorable Commissioned Service:

According to publicly available records, Senator Kerry was released from Active Duty and transferred to the Naval Reserve (inactive) on 3 January 1970. On 1 July 1972 he was transferred to the Standby Reserve (inactive). While a commissioned officer in the inactive Naval Reserve, Senator Kerry traveled to Paris, France and met with official delegations from the Democratic Republic of Vietnam (North Vietnam) and the Provisional Revolutionary Government (the Viet Cong). The Vietnamese Communists eagerly met Senator Kerry and benefited directly from the obvious propaganda victory (See Exhibit 2, page 126 ? 129).

These acts are clear violations of the legal prohibitions on individual citizens negotiating with foreign powers (18 U.S.C. ' 953) and the constitutional prohibition against giving support to our nation?s enemies in wartime (Article III, Section 3). Additionally, as a commissioned officer of the Naval Reserve, Senator Kerry was subject to the UCMJ, and likely violated Article 104 (?Aiding the Enemy?) through his actions with the North Vietnamese/Viet Cong delegation.

Senator Kerry returned from his private negotiations with the Vietnamese Communists to Washington, DC and held a press conference. At that press event, Senator Kerry advocated a Vietnamese Communist ?peace proposal? calling for a U.S. withdrawal from Vietnam and payment of war damage reparations to the Communist government. Senator Kerry engaged in this advocacy on behalf of a foreign power with who we were at war while continuing to hold a commission as an officer in the U.S. Naval Reserve.

A detailed treatment of Senator Kerry?s dishonorable service during the period from 3 January 1970 through 16 February 1978, when he was incorrectly granted an ?Honorable Discharge,? can be found in Exhibit 2, Chapters 6 ? 10, pages 99 ? 185.
Wow, other than just plain being embarrassed about Kerry, I don't see how anyone can just pretend that his actions while commissioned and afterward aren't critical discussion for a run for presidency; being that he's campaigned on it. Anti-bush crowd wants to move past Kerry's service, understandably... Unfortunately for them, Kerry's proud of his 'covert' acts and loves to talk about himself.


 
Originally posted by: thegimp03
He is of course attempting to mislead everyone and make it appear he is a "decorated war veteran". Laff.

:cookie: for the troll. What wars have you fought it junior? I mean other than the ones that when you die, you can respawn at the Command Post?
 
Originally posted by: digitalsm
Originally posted by: dahunan
Originally posted by: her209
The Pentagon also needs to investigate Bush's military record.


But they won't AND this was directed by the BUSH Administration -- this is not some NON-Partisan Commission who chose to do this...

This is disgusting.. I wish the citizens of America were bright enough to see this.. but they aren't

The problem is, the former Navy Seceratary claims he never saw, or signed the silver star citation. I agree this is a waste of time but both sides are being overly political in this whole veitnam mess.

The problem is that everyone is assuming it is Secretary John Lehman's signature on the award and not Senator John Lester Hubbard Chafee's who was Secretary of the Navy at the time in question.

 
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Originally posted by: dahunan
the investigation isn't the upsetting part.. it is the timing.. 🙁

Yep😛 I guess the days of it being the "seriousness of the charge" are gone and we're in the era of "timing" 😛

Absolutely hilarious...

CsG


LOL.

Reminds me of when Bush Sr. was running for President and the S&L fiasco, which was know about before the election somehow never say the light of day until after teh election. Weren't some Bushes involved in that? Talk about timing!!

Now tell me that timing isn't the issue, it's the seriousness of the charge. LOL!!

😛
Absolutely hilarious...
😛

Hey, we agree 😀
 
I haven't read all of the replies but I thought I'd share my view...

1. People want all of the Vietnam talk to stop... Kerry is the one that began his candidacy on his Vietnam Experience. That makes Vietnam a valid discussion when talking about Kerry.

2. John Kerry didn't fill out his DD-214. This was done by the Command at his station when he seperated. If the command at his station says he got the "V" then until it's prove otherwise, he gets it and there are no illegal activities. The DD-214 isn't created by looking at the members uniform, it is created by the personnel record. For those that don't know what a DD-214 is, it is the document you get from the military when you leave active duty. Some of the information included are time in service and awards. It is considered "Gospel" since the command fills this out from your record.

3. This wont be a legal issue if it turns out that the DD-214 was filled out incorrectly by his command. He'll just lose the V pin and go from there.

4. I am all for the military checking both candidates.

5. Conjur needs to calm down when it comes to being a post cop. I bet half of his posts are from bitching about reposts and thread location.

[EDIT] Before people start tapping their sarcasm meter to see if it's accurate... It is 100% sarcasm on #5.[/EDIT]
 
Back
Top