And that has what to do with receiving government benefits?
It is about EDUCATION. Not things like welfare.
And that has what to do with receiving government benefits?
It is about EDUCATION. Not things like welfare.
"On Dzhokhar Tsarnaevs college aid, University of Massachusetts Dartmouth spokesman Robert Connolly said, It is our position and I believe the accepted position in higher education that student records including academic records and financial records (including financial aid) cannot under federal law be released without a students consent."
The more you know.
- Oct 30, 2000
- 42,589
- 5
- 0
What will the release if records accomplish except to inflame?
What useful information is there in terms of student loans, grants, classes and grades.
It is not like UM to have specialized classes in the first couple of years.
What useful information is there in terms of student loans, grants, classes and grades.
It is not like UM to have specialized classes in the first couple of years.
I don't know what it would do. Unless it turned out that UMASS has a marathon bombing course that the taxpayers paid for I don't know what that would tell people or what policy changes we would want to make based on it.
monovillage
Diamond Member
- Jul 3, 2008
- 8,444
- 1
- 0
Nah, just the usual Hate America poli sci courses taught by the typical socialist/communist professors.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angela_Davis
No one advocated having the IRS release Romney's records so this is not remotely similar just like the Tsarnaev's are not asking anyone to vote for them so I don't see how your argument makes any sense at all.
Aside from that would I like to see the brothers' records as well as Romney's taxes prior to the election now I don't really care about the latter.
ferpa
However, in most states if you are a subject of a criminal investigation, a prosecutor only needs a grand jury subpoena to get access to your medical records and other private records.
So, the media/public cannot get it. Law enforcement/prosecution probably already has it.
Last edited:
I linked to FERPA first, but nehalem's reading comprehension skills are about as good as his dating skills.
And this is why you can't argue with liberals. You guys have to resort to making idiotic comments like this.
I don't understand why so many people want to see where their tax money goes.
I mean its not like anyone here was unsophisticated enough to believe Obama when he said "Government should be transparent. Transparency promotes accountability and provides information for citizens about what their Government is doing."
And if he makes programs that spread the Obama phones around to people that support him, and a few end up in terrorist hands, why should that concern anyone? I mean a Chicago Politician has a right to reward those that vote for him, doesn't he?
Government transparency? LOL, you didn't actually believe him when he said that, did you?
Uno
I mean its not like anyone here was unsophisticated enough to believe Obama when he said "Government should be transparent. Transparency promotes accountability and provides information for citizens about what their Government is doing."
And if he makes programs that spread the Obama phones around to people that support him, and a few end up in terrorist hands, why should that concern anyone? I mean a Chicago Politician has a right to reward those that vote for him, doesn't he?
Government transparency? LOL, you didn't actually believe him when he said that, did you?
Uno
SheHateMe
Diamond Member
- Jul 21, 2012
- 7,251
- 20
- 81
You're trying to make this into a political party affiliation issue when what is really going on here is that you're being a fucking dumbass as usual.
How is his statement idiotic?
JEDIYoda
Lifer
- Jul 13, 2005
- 33,986
- 3,321
- 126
You can say that as loud and as long as you want......it still does not mean you are right.....and you can tag the word terrorist for effect....it only proves one thing -- which is that you are bat shit crazy!!
You took Obama's previous statements to mean that his plan was to release private information about citizens in violation of federal law?
Not the brightest bulbs in this thread.
Mass Governors Stonewalling Fails
Information concerning some government support given to Boston Bombers now available.
Of course, it was going to come out sooner or later.
While I'd rather read it in the news sooner, I'm okay with reading it in Wikileaks, or similar, outlet, later.
Uno
Information concerning some government support given to Boston Bombers now available.
Of course, it was going to come out sooner or later.
While I'd rather read it in the news sooner, I'm okay with reading it in Wikileaks, or similar, outlet, later.
Uno
When I buy a shirt at Walmart, does that give me access to all the financial information of the Walton's since I am paying their salary with my purchase?
I don't see an issue here. Obviously I think the public has a right to know how much total money is being spent on government support like welfare, but I don't see any reason that the public information should go all the way down the individual level.
I think you can probably imagine how much ordinary people would be stigmatized if their name was published in a local newspaper just because they lost their job and received some public assistance. In the end, it would just make it harder for them find new jobs.
If a prosecutor decides they need the information to help secure a conviction (which I seriously doubt they will), they will probably be able to get it.
I think you can probably imagine how much ordinary people would be stigmatized if their name was published in a local newspaper just because they lost their job and received some public assistance. In the end, it would just make it harder for them find new jobs.
If a prosecutor decides they need the information to help secure a conviction (which I seriously doubt they will), they will probably be able to get it.
Last edited:
It isn't about privacy. It is about politicians attempting to keep the information that the Boston Bombers used government welfare to finance their jihad away from the public.
It isn't about privacy. It is about politicians attempting to keep the information that the Boston Bombers used government welfare to finance their jihad away from the public.
Don't expect idiots like obama to call them Jihadists he refuses to do that because he is so PC.
The American taxpayer was forced to pay for jihad and a terrorist attack. Are the idiots who support welfare going to be held accountable for this? NO
her209
No Lifer
- Oct 11, 2000
- 56,336
- 11
- 0
Any school will release information with a court order to police investigator. It is not like an investigation will find much in school records other than attendance records and the classes signe up for, completed, and dropped. All you need then is a simple computation about the charges.
Using this logic, Sandy Hook was tax payer paid as well since the mother was a Teacher and bought her guns with that tax payer money.... Maybe we should start charging all tax payers with accessory charges?
TRENDING THREADS
-
Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)- Started by DisEnchantment
- Replies: 25K
-
Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes + WCL Discussion Threads
- Started by Tigerick
- Replies: 23K
-
Discussion Intel current and future Lakes & Rapids thread- Started by TheF34RChannel
- Replies: 23K
-
-
Facebook
Twitter