• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Pascal 1080 Benchmarks

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Status
Not open for further replies.
What happened to 67c under load? I hope that isn't the typical stock speed's temperature because that doesn't leave much room for thermals (if any). Well, to be fair, that's just half of the equation. I bet noise is low at stock speed. However, that's means a noisy card when overclocked. I wonder how loud the reference cooler will be once overclocked.

That bench was capped at 60fps.
Yeah it better be whisper quiet at that temperature or a lot of people foaming at the bit to get a fancy "founders edition" are going to be disappointed.
 
25-30% increase over 980ti..... Weak sauce. Overclocks better be great or this sucks. For a node shrink, this is garbage.

25% is what some of us (me inc) have been saying for months and months now. It's a realistic expectation for a node shrink, it is only a mid-range chip afterall, don't get too crazy. Yeah its going for ridiculous $699 but at it's heart, it's still a small and efficient, FP64 neutered gaming mid-range chip.

Well within expectations.

Now I expect it to do a 20% OC or so, it's stock boost 1.8 to 1.9ghz, should hit 2.3 to 2.4ghz comfy for the 20% headroom.

If it can pull this off, a lot of games are gonna hit that magical 4K 60 FPS mark. 🙂
 
This 980Ti at stock ? 1050Mhz ?

There is no such thing as a 980Ti running at 1050mhz or even 1078mhz. These paper spec mean nothing. Reference 980Ti boosts to 1.2ghz and higher. That's the real clocks.

Same for the 1080. 1733mhz is just paper spec, it means nothing. The performance profile you get from a 1080 comes from 1.86+ ghz.
 
MGFPQ8L.jpg


http://www.pcper.com/reviews/Graphi...ers-Edition-Review-GP104-Brings-Pascal-Gamers

http://www.guru3d.com/articles-pages/nvidia-geforce-gtx-1080-review,1.html

http://www.overclockersclub.com/reviews/nvidia_geforcegtx_1080_founders_edition/

http://hothardware.com/reviews/nvidia-geforce-gtx-1080-pascal-gpu-review
 
Last edited:
Wait for review outlets who follow Nvidia's reviewer guidelines and have stock 980Ti's on hand. Oh this is going to be good. THe 1080 is going to look amazing in reviews today from big outlets.
 
All the reviews are up.

Anandtechs

81667.png


81666.png


TPU

perfrel_2560_1440.png


perfrel_3840_2160.png


^ Got the biggest margins so far.

The reason is quite obvious too, TPU has more recent titles in their benches. The gap is much wider in more recent modern console port titles than older ones.

As I've said several times, Pascal is much more suited to modern gaming due to its changed configuration and better graphics <-> compute switching. This means it's gap will only grow with time as games become more compute heavy and even more GCN optimized (where Maxwell takes a dive).
 
Last edited:
I'll stick to MSRP.

So if NV set MSRP at $399 and the only cards were selling are $699... lol you really would apply the MSRP to your buying decisions? Make sure you bring extra $$ if that's the case.


Threadcrapping and trolling are not allowed
Markfw900
 
Last edited by a moderator:
"Well that isn&#8217;t all that shabby now is it? After more than two hours working on Precision the core was able to hit a constant Boost speed of 2126MHz, representing a pretty shocking 400MHz+ overclock when compared to the standard load results I achieved."

http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/foru.../72619-nvidia-geforce-gtx-1080-review-24.html

Are these guys that stupid they don't understand boost clocks?

OMG guys, 400mhz OC! Just no. -_-

GTX-1080-REVIEWS-18.png



Threadcrapping and trolling are not allowed
Markfw900
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I want to see max overclocks. It looks like the reference cooler is not good enough for overclocking. 55% on the stock blower is freaking loud. Plus, that single 8pin connector might be a limiting factor when it comes to max overclocking. I think anything beyond 2000mhz will require better cooling and power delivery. We need to see AIB cards with better cooling and power delivery.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top