Originally posted by: WhipperSnapper
Was the librarian fired? She didn't want to comment? That almost suggests that she received a payment--a settlement with a "don't ever talk about this" provision--that the city and its taxpayers had to pay for all because of Palin's religious insanity and desire to overturn the First Amendment.
If you'd read the article, you'd find that the librarian wasn't fired. You'd also read that even her own mayoral opponent's campaign manager doesn't recall anything about Palin wanting to ban certain books.
But if instead, you'd like to ignore the facts you didn't read and instead make something entirely up (like the librarian was paid off), I guess that's your call. Adding the "fact" that the city and taxpayers had to pay for "Palin's religious insanity" is a creative fictional masterpiece! Maybe you can find someone in Wassilla and tell them this wonderful story, so we can all read about it tomorrow on the front page of the New York Times? The headline: "PALIN UNDER PRESSURE AFTER PAYOFF TO HIDE RELIGIOUS EXTREMISM REVEALED"