Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Originally posted by: Genx87
Gores son was busted in 2000 driving an SUV in North Carolina at 100 mph. It was an interesting situation that looked suspiciously covered by the police. He was also busted in 2002 in Virginia under the influence, 2003 for drug posession in a vehicle that got him into a rehab center, and finally in 2007 for drug posession after doing 100 mph.
I dont really care about Gore's kids problems. I brought it up to point out how the media barely touched the subject. If it was Palins kid doing 100 in an SUV. The kid and Sarah would be lambasted. Either way kids should be left alone in a race.
Considering how hard it was for you to find any information excect the one last year that really got the kid into trouble. It kind of proves my point.
Wait! Al Gore's son was busted during the year he ran for President and the media didn't make a front page story out of it??
And the left wonders why we complain about the media double standard.
On the left we have:
A former KKK member
A guy who let his boyfriend run a prostitution ring out of his house
a guy who drove a car into the water and left a girl there to drown
And that is just three examples. Imagine if these guys were Republicans, they would have been run out of office long ago.
Al Gore's son got busted for speeding. No drugs, no alcohol, speeding. (the funny thing is that I have gotten a ticket for going the same speed.) You want a front page story and a big deal out of a speeding ticket? Here's a tip: don't ever run a newspaper. And the right wonders why we laugh at their myth of persecution by the media. (not to mention their poor research ability)
As for his reckless driving arrest in 2000, it most certainly WAS reported by the news.
ABC,
LA Times, CBS News, The New York Times, etc... etc... etc. The funny thing is that the only reason these articles are difficult to find in the SLIGHTEST is because the media was so covered with OTHER embarrassing reports of Al Gore's son that are more recent, so Google assumes you want those. So no Genx, it in no way proves your point. What it shows is that Google reports information from 2007 more readily than a similar event in 2000. This should be expected.
The real problem with the right's myth of media persecution is that it requires you to prove a negative. No matter how often they are proven wrong, they continue to shriek about how the media is unfair to them. They hold up a new case like this one and say "SEE!? WE WERE RIGHT, IT'S SO UNFAIR". Then when they are proven wrong yet again, they just go back to searching for something else they can claim is biased. They never take the pile of all the times they have been shown wrong to mean that maybe their premise is flawed, because it's simply part of their mythology. It's not open to question.
In many ways it's a clever strategy, as the right has been able to very effectively intimidate the media. I just wish the media would realize that no matter how far they go to accommodate the right, the attacks will never stop. They exist for their own sake.