Someone should clue Sharky and Co. in on motherboards. They didn't do a very good job with the article.
Intel has also created something of a conundrum in choosing a prime overclocking platform. Their i845 is a solid chipset, but it does not have support for the 133/533 MHz FSB. The i845E would be the natural choice, but this does not feature support for DDR333.
Umm what about all the 845D/E boards that have 3:4 ratio and support DDR355 just fine? Shouldn't this deserve at least a mention? I doubt they even realize this is a feature.
The i845G has both required features, but buyers will need to pay a bit more for the integrated graphics core, as well as dealing with less-than robust i845G motherboard designs.
Say what??
Not having official support for the 133/533 MHz FSB can cause problems with overclocking above the default 100 MHz FSB (standard) of the Pentium 4-1.6A, 1.8A and 2.0A processors. Chipsets such as the i845 and SiS 645 may not have the proper AGP/PCI dividers in place at higher-than 100 MHz FSB speeds, and can cause erratic performance or system instabilities.
Newer chipsets such as the SiS 645DX or i845E/G do away with these concerns by providing higher AGP and PCI dividers for use at the 133 MHz FSB. We should also note at this time that many i845D based motherboards (regardless of FSB speeds) lock their AGP and PCI frequencies at 66 and 33 MHz respectively, so there isn't a great danger to your peripherals when overclocking with many high-end i845 DDR motherboards
845D? Many 845D/E/G boards have the AGP/PCI lock (any of the good ones anyway). Why is just 845D mentioned?
Considering performance, stability, and availability factors, along with full support for the 133/533 MHz FSB and DDR333, the natural recommendation is a motherboard based on the SIS 645DX chipset.
845G overclocks better, has 533 FSB/DDR333 support, PCI/AGP lock. Better overclocking, stability, performance. I don't get the reason for that recommendation. 845D/E with DDR355 and PCI/AGP lock is also a better choice.
The final SiSoft SANDRA benchmark test concerns memory bandwidth, and we once again want to remind you that we are dealing with two totally different platforms here. The Pentium 4-1.6A using the i845D motherboard gets a nice jump in its step from the higher core speed, but this is still moving upwards from the basic 266 MHz DDR speed
Again, the 845D has DDR355 capability. They used the (IMHO crappy) P4B266 which is one of the 845D boards without DDR355 support. It doesn't mean that all 845D's are limited.
Another finding is that both upgraders and new system buyers can easily reap the benefits of the recent Pentium 4 overclocking frenzy, assuming a compatible Socket 478 motherboard is used. The i845D may not have all the performance or bus speed options of a SiS 645DX board, but it should fill the overclocking role quite well
845D will easily outperform an SiS if you get the right 845D board. Also, why compare 645DX against 845D? Where is the test of the 845E and 845G?
Not a good review IMHO.