• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

OWS Protestors throw condoms at schoolgirls

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Reported:

Londo Jono posting Intellectual dishonesty yet again and calling me the liar when he is doing the lying.

Posting link that has nothing to do with the subject matter.

This has been this stalkers MO for a long time.

Pushing report post per AdministratorIDontCare

You are not supposed to say you reported someone when you do. It probably got lost in the jokes where we said we reported people in the thread about it. Figured you would want to know so you do not accidently get yourself in trouble. 🙂
 
No, really. He did say Christian Shiria. You are a liar by posting he did not say it...especially when he did AND I quoted it.

But to help your pathetically short memory span (and inability to scroll upward, sucks having a mouse so old it does not have a scroll button, eh?) I will requote (bolding mine):
Anybody else care to indulge Cybrsage's compulsion to get in the last word while absolutely refusing to ever acknowledge his own intellectual dishonesty? I did a few times when he was a brand new troll and his tireless dancing and dodging was somewhat novel, but now it's the same old boring schtick and it's just not worth my time.

Here's how it works: You will post something reasoned and factual that clearly shows how Cybrsage is being dishonest. He will respond with some sort of deflection or straw man or other fallacious argument, ignoring what you actually said. You will respond with another reasoned and factual post. He will then repeat his noise. This will continue for a dozen or more times.

Once he finally recognizes you have overwhelmingly trapped him in his dishonesty and you are determined to hold him accountable, he changes tactics. Instead of pretending to address your reply, he will alter your quote entirely. It will invariably be something childish, and often something with the sort of smarmy sexual innuendo one typically sees in middle school students (perhaps not a coincidence). He will then comment on his altered quote, once again with something childishly uncreative and unfunny.

So how about it? Somebody else want the pleasure of slapping around P&N's most prolific troll? It can be entertaining as long as you never get sucked into taking him seriously.
 
Last edited:
Here's how it works: You will post something reasoned and factual that clearly shows how Cybrsage is being dishonest.

Lets play the "follow along" game.

WhipperSnapper used the phrase Christian Sharia.
Cybrsage said this phrase is nonsensical, as Sharia is Islamic Law. There is no such thing as Christian Islamic Law.
Bowfinger claimed Cybrsage lied about this statement.
Cybrsage quotes statement a second time.
Bowfinger pretends the conversation never happened, instead pretending Cybrsage is the dishonest one when Bowfinger is actually being dishonest.


I realize that projecting your faults onto others is a normal human response when you are forced to face your faults, but understand that it makes you look silly.



You can correct this by admitting WhiperSnapper DID say Christian Sharia. Somehow, I think you will refuse to do so, even though it has been quoted twice.
 
Anybody else care to indulge Cybrsage's compulsion to get in the last word while absolutely refusing to ever acknowledge his own intellectual dishonesty? I did a few times when he was a brand new troll and his tireless dancing and dodging was somewhat novel, but now it's the same old boring schtick and it's just not worth my time.

Here's how it works: You will post something reasoned and factual that clearly shows how Cybrsage is being dishonest. He will respond with some sort of deflection or straw man or other fallacious argument, ignoring what you actually said. You will respond with another reasoned and factual post. He will then repeat his noise. This will continue for a dozen or more times.

Once he finally recognizes you have overwhelmingly trapped him in his dishonesty and you are determined to hold him accountable, he changes tactics. Instead of pretending to address your reply, he will alter your quote entirely. It will invariably be something childish, and often something with the sort of smarmy sexual innuendo one typically sees in middle school students (perhaps not a coincidence). He will then comment on his altered quote, once again with something childishly uncreative and unfunny.

So how about it? Somebody else want the pleasure of slapping around P&N's most prolific troll? It can be entertaining as long as you never get sucked into taking him seriously.

I'm sure he rationalizes to himself all his behavior. He tells himself he's clever. He tells himself that if people get upset, he must be special. But I think there's some sort of psychopathology going on there. The bizarre sexual stuff combined with his religious affiliation is a dead giveaway that he's got issues.

But sooner or later (probably sooner), he'll get banned. Without this forum as an outlet, he might actually have to confront his demons.
 
Originally Posted by dmcowen674
Reported:

Londo Jono posting Intellectual dishonesty yet again and calling me the liar when he is doing the lying.

Posting link that has nothing to do with the subject matter.

This has been this stalkers MO for a long time.

Pushing report post per AdministratorIDontCare


So let me get this straight, when you go on and on about gas prices you live near downtown Chicago and when you claim you took part in an OWS protest OccupyChicago isn't a valid source for OWS protests in Chicago????

This is what happens when you personally attack someone instead of the topic or issue in the thread. The location of people change over time.

I still go to Chicago for meetings etc but no longer everyday.

Hopefully either the Administrator or Moderators sanction you.
 
Originally Posted by dmcowen674
Reported:

Londo Jono posting Intellectual dishonesty yet again and calling me the liar when he is doing the lying.

Posting link that has nothing to do with the subject matter.

This has been this stalkers MO for a long time.

Pushing report post per AdministratorIDontCare


You are not supposed to say you reported someone when you do. It probably got lost in the jokes where we said we reported people in the thread about it. Figured you would want to know so you do not accidently get yourself in trouble. 🙂

Problem is they claim to not see the offending posts by people like Doppel and Lono Jowo in my case.

They may see other offending posts but not for me so apparently I have to help them.
 
No, really. He did say Christian Shiria. You are a liar by posting he did not say it...especially when he did AND I quoted it.

I did in fact say Christian Sharia, and I feel pretty confident that anyone with half-a-brain would know what I meant by it. By "Christian Sharia" I mean a set of laws based on extreme fundamentalist Christianity.

Under Christian Sharia abortion for any reason even in the cases of rape or to save the life of the mother would be completely illegal. All forms of birth control would be illegal. Divorce would be illegal. Premarital sex would be illegal. Alcohol would be illegal. Teaching or transmitting information about evolution would be illegal. Etc.

You really couldn't figure out what I meant by Christian Sharia on your own?
 
I did in fact say Christian Sharia, and I feel pretty confident that anyone with half-a-brain would know what I meant by it. By "Christian Sharia" I mean a set of laws based on extreme fundamentalist Christianity.

Under Christian Sharia abortion for any reason even in the cases of rape or to save the life of the mother would be completely illegal. All forms of birth control would be illegal. Divorce would be illegal. Premarital sex would be illegal. Alcohol would be illegal. Teaching or transmitting information about evolution would be illegal. Etc.

You really couldn't figure out what I meant by Christian Sharia on your own?
Of course he could, but if he acknowledged that it would require effort and honesty to have a productive debate about it. It was far easier for him to respond with dishonest noise.
 
Originally Posted by dmcowen674
Reported:

Londo Jono posting Intellectual dishonesty yet again and calling me the liar when he is doing the lying.

Posting link that has nothing to do with the subject matter.

This has been this stalkers MO for a long time.

Pushing report post per AdministratorIDontCare




Problem is they claim to not see the offending posts by people like Doppel and Lono Jowo in my case.

They may see other offending posts but not for me so apparently I have to help them.

You could post a link that proves there was an actual protest. If not maybe, just maybe the mods see that you're the one being dishonest.
 
I did in fact say Christian Sharia, and I feel pretty confident that anyone with half-a-brain would know what I meant by it. By "Christian Sharia" I mean a set of laws based on extreme fundamentalist Christianity.

You really couldn't figure out what I meant by Christian Sharia on your own?

That would be like saying the Planned Parenthood Pro-Life Group. Yeah, nonsensical.

I know you invented the non-sensical phrase as an attempt to combine emotional distrust of Islam with Christianity, but it failed.

Christian Sharia does not, and cannot, exist. You need a new phrase. Try Levitical Christianity or some such thing instead.


As an aside, you should expect Bowfinger to call you intellectually dishonest for saying you actually posted what you posted. It is what he does.
 
You really aren't doing yourself any favours here. Its pretty obvious what he means by "Christian Shari'a", and if it wasn't you could just ask him.

He means something that does not, and cannot, exist. Might as well say Michael Moore Republican PAC. Makes as much sense.
 
That would be like saying the Planned Parenthood Pro-Life Group. Yeah, nonsensical.

I know you invented the non-sensical phrase as an attempt to combine emotional distrust of Islam with Christianity, but it failed.

Christian Sharia does not, and cannot, exist. You need a new phrase. Try Levitical Christianity or some such thing instead.


As an aside, you should expect Bowfinger to call you intellectually dishonest for saying you actually posted what you posted. It is what he does.


Given that you can obviously tell what he means from the phrase it does look quite troll like on your part. And he didn't invent the phrase at all.
 
Originally Posted by dmcowen674
Reported:

Londo Jono posting Intellectual dishonesty yet again and calling me the liar when he is doing the lying.

Posting link that has nothing to do with the subject matter.

This has been this stalkers MO for a long time.

Pushing report post per AdministratorIDontCare




This is what happens when you personally attack someone instead of the topic or issue in the thread. The location of people change over time.

I still go to Chicago for meetings etc but no longer everyday.

Hopefully either the Administrator or Moderators sanction you.

So in other words, your ranting and raving over Chicago gas prices was BS as well as you were paying the lower prices in the suburbs. Damn you really are a dishonest person.
 
He means something that does not, and cannot, exist. Might as well say Michael Moore Republican PAC. Makes as much sense.

Your analogies are fail, just more of your usual intellectual dishonesty. His metaphor, in contrast, was quite apt. It's also fun to note you are behaving exactly as I predicted. Keep it up, short-timer.
 
Given that you can obviously tell what he means from the phrase it does look quite troll like on your part. And he didn't invent the phrase at all.

Sorry, gave him the benefit of being smart. You apparently say he is stupid. Why do you dislike him so much?
 
Also I think this drives home the point if you protest something long enough eventually you will alienate EVERYONE. Even folks who may have sided with you in the beginning.
 
He means fundamentalist laws based upon the Christian faith, its pretty obvious, and you know it as well as everyone else.

Then he should not have said Christian Islamic Law. Is it too hard for people to say what they actually mean instead of saying something completely nonsensical?
 
So you finally agree he said Christian Sharia? When did this sudden change of view happen? Was it when he claimed he said it? It certainly was not after I quoted him saying it twice.

Inquiring minds want to know.
You really can't help yourself, can you? You are a social misfit and a pathological liar. Get help. Seriously.
 
Back
Top