I got my Kodak frames yesterday...My observations:
1) Nice looking real wood frame. This will look nice on almost
any mantle. Great gift.
2) Trivially easy to use. At first, I was kinda disappointed they
didn't offer USB connectivity to upload photos, but after playing
with it a bit, I couldn't care less. You can store around 200
pictures on a 16mb compactflash card (+/- will depend on the
composition of the pictures), assuming you reduce the pictures
to 640x480 before loading them to the card. That means you can
store around 3200 or more pictures on a 256mb card (if you were
so inclined). That's basically a lifetime's worth of decent shots
for most people!
3) Very good picture quality. This uses a TFT screen which can be
viewed from an angle, is bright and clear. Resolution is a true
640x480. Only gripe is the piece of glass that sits in front of the
LCD is textured which, to my eyes, makes the picture just a wee
bit less clear than it would otherwise be.
4) In slideshow mode, the fastest you can switch between photos is
5 seconds. Even in manual mode, it takes around this amount of time
to go from picture to picture (for pictures on the compactflash card,
anyway). This can get to be somewhat annoying if you're trying to
search for a particular picture and you have a lot to look through.
5) In menu mode, you can browse through the photos to pick the ones
you want to copy to the frame or the ones you want to delete.
In order for the thumbnails to show up, you MUST have photos with
EXIF data intact. This info is written by digital cameras, but is
generally stripped off when you convert your photos to a smaller
size. The only convenient batch converting program I could find that
maintains the EXIF data is Ulead PhotoExplorer 7 Pro. Programs like
IrfranView, etc. strip off the EXIF, which means you won't be able
to see the thumbnails in menu mode. Personally, given the limitations
(speed, number of thumbnails you can see at once), I'd do my editing
on the host PC and not the frame. But this is something to consider.
6) This frame is so much better than the Kensington "$50" frame, it's
pathetic. The Kensington uses a poor quality passive matrix
320x240 resolution LCD. The Kodak uses a TFT active
matrix 640x480 screen. No competition. Not even
close. Even the most undemanding, uncritical user would choose the
Kodak. The Kensington has fixed memory that can only hold 12 pictures.
The Kodak can hold 36 photos in built-in memory, and an almost
unlimited number in compactflash. The Kensington depends on software
and drivers that are specific for the Kensington. I wouldn't hold
my breath for future driver support. The Kodak software is built
into the frame. The only thing it requires is a compactflash card.
As long as compactflash card/readers are supported by your computer's
OS, you'll be fine.
Bottom line: This is terrific.
(And Kensington sucks the big wad).
Kwad